History of Economic Thought Flashcards
Changes in Europe in the 16th and 17th Century.
- Birth and consolidation of nation states, sometimes after long civil wars (France, Spain, United Kingdom..)
- Political and military power depends on the wealth of the State=sovereign
- The question arises: which are the sources of wealth?
- At the same time, expansion of long-distance trade, with new routes to the Americas and Asia; a new class of merchants and bankers emerges.
What country is economic science was born in?
Economic science was born in France in the 18th century.
Richard Cantillon
- An Irishman, who died in London in 1734 (?)
- Essai sur la nature du commerce en général (Essay on the Nature of Trade in General)
- It was published in French in 1755, but it was composed approx. in the period 1728-1730
- A treaty where we find the same issues that will be addressed by Adam Smith 50 years later: definition and creation of wealth, its circulation, the role of markets, money, foreign trade
- Its publication marks the beginning of a period that lasted until the French Revolution during which dozens of books and pamphlets on economic subjects were published in France.
What is the Natural Order?
- Human activity is governed by natural laws similar to those that govern the world of nature (for example, the law of universal gravitation).
- Attempts to oppose these natural laws are useless or at worst harmful.
- «to govern better it was necessary to govern less» « laissez faire, laissez passer»: these two maxims must be interpreted in their historical context. Trade was strictly regulated then, above all grain trade.
Agriculture and the production of grain
• Grain was the staple food of the population; its price had strong political implications.
• Not the whole harvest could be consumed; a part had to be set aside for use as seed the following year
• Demand for grain was inelastic and depended mainly on the size of the population; supply of grain was heavily dependent on weather conditions; grain prices tended to vary from one year to the next.
• The importance of grain price inspired strong regulation: export ban (so as not to harm consumers) import ban (so as not to harm consumers); limits even to domestic trade
Most important for people was to eat - mostly grain.
Link between Agriculture and wealth the policy implication.
- The source of wealth is the agricultural surplus which circulates among the classes: the greater the surplus, the wealthier the whole country.
- Agricultural productivity must increase through appropriate investment . Investment comes out of the surplus which must not be diverted to the production of luxury goods that can be imported from abroad (against Colbertism).
- Taxes are ultimately funded by the surplus: all taxes (hitherto paid by consumers and bourgeoisie) replaced by a single tax paid by landowners who did not pay taxes together with the clergy.
- Trade must be free within the kingdom: no special taxes and duties.
- Freedom of export: trade in raw produce in exchange for luxury goods from other nations.
- Freedom of import: Agriculture should not be protected by foreign competition which could be a powerful stimulus for improvement.
Liberalization of grain trade in practice
- After a short-lived attempt in 1763-1770, when both internal and external grain trade was liberalized, free internal grain trade was resumed in 1774 when Turgot became Controleur Général des Finances.
- This experiment also lasted little as did Turgot’s career which ended in 1776
- Like the physiocrats, Turgot was also accused of extremism, of blindly following an idea without taking into account its practical implications and negative consequences for a part of the population.
Adam Smith
- Smith was born in Kirkcaldy, near Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1723. Professor of Moral Philosophy at Glasgow 1752-1764.
- He published two books (and two only) during his lifetime: The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776, better known as the Wealth of Nations).
- He died in Edinburgh in 1790, in time to see the 6th edition of TMS through the press.
The Wealth of Nations
The book is about how much an individual can produce for a country and it is the most influential book in modern Economics.
The division of labour and size of market
- The process of growth based on the division of labour, the surplus and accumulation finds a limit in the size of markets
- In the simple example of the pin factory, while the number of pins produced can grow together with the division of labour, the number of pins that can be sold depends on the demand for pins, which depends on the size of the market in which pins are sold
- ‘The division of labour is limited by the extent of the market’ (‘Smith’s theorem’)
- Policy implications: freedom of enterprise and free trade.
The division of labour and exchange: the problem of value
- The higher the degree of specialisation, the more the individual will enter the market to sell her/his product in exchange for commodities produced by other specialised workers
- The bigger the markets, the more these social relations become anonymous and regulated by one factor and one only, namely, a set of relative prices (how much of commodity A will buy that much of commodity B, what is the value of C in terms of D, and so on).
The division of labour and the surplus
- As far as accumulation increases, the division of labour can also increase
- As the division of labour increases, productivity also increases
- Even if L/P remains constant, this can lead to the production of resources in excess of the minimum quantity that that system needs in order to reproduce itself
- These resources in excess are the surplus DoL ↑ → π ↑ → surplus → DoL ↑ (… and so on).
Value in use and value in exchange
• To introduce the distinction between value in use and value in exchange Smith used the ‘water diamond paradox’: “The word value [. . .] sometimes expresses the utility of some particular object, and sometimes the power of purchasing other goods which the possession of that object conveys. The one may be called ‘value in use’; the other, ‘value in exchange’. The things which have the greatest value in use have frequently little or no value in exchange; and, on the contrary, those which have the greatest value in exchange have frequently little or no value in use.
Rent
Rent is the income derived from the possession of natural resources (land) that, by definition, are not the product of human labour.
Smith’s assumption on value/capital
Smith was assuming that labour is the only factor of production, which holds true only at an early stage of society, in which natural resources (land) are free and there is no accumulation/appropriation of capital.
The three classes of people
These classes of people have different income:
• Labourers, whose incomes is Wages
• Capitalists, whose income is Profit
• Landowners, whose income is Rent
Adam Smith’s answer of measuring rent and profits in terms of labour.
He views labour as a real value of commodities: “The real value of all the different component parts of price [wages + rents + profits], it must be observed, is measured by the quantity of labour … The value of any commodity, therefore, to the person who possesses it, and who means not to use or consume it himself, but to exchange it for other commodities, is equal to the quantity of labour which it enables him to purchase or command. Labour, therefore, is the real measure of the exchangeable value of all commodities.”
Adam Smith’s answer to wages and profits in relation to prices.
“As soon as stock [capital] has accumulated in the hands of particular persons … ” and “As soon as the land of any country has all become private property….”, profits and rents will also be paid:
“Wages, profit, and rent, are the three original sources of all revenue as well as of all exchangeable value”
Wages + Profits + Rents (at their natural level) → value.
Adam Smith’s definition of “market price”
“The actual price at which any commodity is commonly sold is called its market price. It may either be above, or below, or exactly the same with its natural price” (WN in M&S, p. 163)
Adam Smith’s definition of a market correction (excess supply)
“If at any time it [the quantity brought to market] exceeds the effectual demand, some of the component parts of its price must be paid below their natural rate. If it is rent, the interest of the landlords will immediately prompt them to withdraw a part of their land; and if it is wages or profit, the interest of the labourers in the one case, and of their employers in the other, will prompt them to withdraw a part of their labour or stock from this employment. The quantity brought to market will soon be no more than sufficient to supply the effective demand” (WN in M&S, p. 164).
Gravitation of prices
“The natural price, therefore, is, as it were, the central price, to which the prices of all commodities are continually gravitating” (WN).
No formal definition of demand relating quantities to prices there are also no processes in the book theory of the mind.
Summary of Adam Smith’s main concepts on value
- Smith’s approach to the problem of value is nuanced and sometimes ambiguous
- He clearly distinguished between value in use and value of exchange (as in the water/diamond paradox) and it is also clear that, for him as well as for other classical economists, value in use is a necessary condition for value in exchange
- It is not always clear whether Smith was looking for the causes of value, or if he was looking for a stable measure of value, and he seems to oscillate between two different ideas of labour as the source/measure of value: labour commanded/labour contained
- He included profits and rents, along with wages, among the determinants of prices, and he described the way in which these three components are determined by supply and demand…
- … but he held fast to the view that labour is the “real value” of commodities, and therefore of wages as well as of profits and rents
- He produced a clear description (which is not yet a complete theory) of competitive markets as self-equilibrating mechanisms driven by price signals.
David Ricardo
The son of a stockbroker in the London Stock Exchange and a stockbroker himself.
Little formal education; starts working at the age of 14 with his father
Gets interested in political economy after reading The Wealth of Nations
Becomes member of parliament in 1819
Involved in the great economic controversies of his time:
• the debate on Free Trade (against the Corn Laws)
• the «Bullionist controversy»
• the debate on how to repay the British huge public debt after the Napoleonic wars.
Ricardo vs Smith
- D. Ricardo : “classic” economist (both for Marx and Keynes, but with different meaning )
- Ricardo favours a theoretical-deductive approach based on the construction of models based on clear hypotheses rather than Smith’s inductive, realistic approach, of which, however, like everyone else, he declares himself a follower.
- This approach is Ricardo’s imperishable influence.
- Search for “natural” laws.
- As a classical economist Ricardo will influence economic theory in several aspects.
Ricardo and Comparative Advantages
International trade in the reflection of economists from mercantilism to Ricardo (Ricardo = theorist of globalisation?)
Both countries will gain by specialising in the production (and export) of the good for which they have a comparative advantage. Even the least efficient country will gain from the exchange.
Income distribution as the principal problem of political economy
- surplus = annual national production minus that part which must be devoted to enabling continuous national production and reproduction to take place.
- Surplus is the product of labour. The more people are employed productively, the greater the surplus
- Employment depends on capital, therefore growth depends on capital accumulation, i.e. on investment
- Investment depends on profits
- The prosperity of the country depends on the prosperity of one class, that of the capitalists (“owners of stock or capital”).
- The landowners spend their income on consumption (unproductively) while the capitalists save their income and invest it.
What did Ricardo find unsastifcatory in Smith’s theory of price and commodity?
“When the price of any commodity is neither more nor less than what is sufficient to pay the rent of the land, the wages of the labour, and the profits of the stock employed in raising, preparing, and bringing it to market, according to their natural rates, the commodity is then sold for what may be called its natural price” (WN, in M&S, p. 163)
Say’s Law
The production of a good implies the creation of a demand of equal value, through the revenues of the owner of the three elements of production [rent, profits, wages]:
“The sum of the revenues of all the individuals which make up a nation makes up the revenue of that nation. It is equivalent to the gross value of all her products.»
Ricardo’s theory of the long-term trend of the rate of profit
There is one «natural» rate of profit; its uniformity is one of the main characters of a capitalist economy Definition of rate of profit:
Rate of profit = Profits/ K (different from P/Y=share of profits)
How to measure capital?
Two solutions:
1. One commodity model
2. Theory of prices
Corn-model
- Corn is the only good: it is both input (seeds, food for the workers) and output
- Land is a heterogeneous factor of production, i.e. lands of different fertility
- Theory of differential rent: rent depends on the different fertility of the soil. If all land had the same fertility, there would be no rent.