Historical perspectives on The Holocaust Flashcards
What was the traditional portrayal of the Holocaust before the 1990s?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
The Holocaust was typically portrayed as a bureaucratic and industrial killing system, implemented by German Nazis against the Jews as racial enemies, according to Hitler’s plan outlined in Mein Kampf.
How have scholars revised their understanding of the Holocaust over the years
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
Historians now understand that the Holocaust was made possible not just by dedicated Nazi officials, but also by the actions and inactions of millions of ordinary people of various nationalities, ideologies, genders, social identities, economic statuses, and religious beliefs.
New knowledge from previously inaccessible archives, testimonies, and ethnic violence studies has expanded our understanding of the Holocaust and placed it in a broader context of genocide.
What are some of the new sources that have contributed to a deeper understanding of the Holocaust?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
New sources include previously inaccessible archives, testimonies, and oral history collections that shed light on the long-term trauma experienced by victims, witnesses, and perpetrators. Ethnic violence studies have also helped to contextualise the Holocaust within a broader history of genocide.
How have institutions that emerged in the 1990s responded to the evolving understanding of the Holocaust?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
Many institutions, such as the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, are revitalising their permanent exhibitions, and new publications are presenting more complex narratives that reflect the evolving understanding of the Holocaust.
What is Dan Stone’s book “The Holocaust: An unfinished history” about?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
Stone’s book is a survey that updates the history of the European genocide, highlighting how the Holocaust had roots that were sown centuries before Hitler’s rise to power and how it was a continent-wide crime that involved exterminationist ideologies and genocidal actions across Europe.
How was antisemitism embedded in the European worldview before the Nazis took it up as a defining element of their doctrine?
- Jews were often s……… for s……. p……. .
- C19th..?
- Religious teachings reinforced negative ..?
- Antisemitism was also fuelled ..?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
- Jews were often scapegoated for societal problems, and viewed as outsiders who posed a threat to Christian values and culture.
- C19th ‘scientific racism’ underpinned some antisemitic thinking
- Religious teachings reinforced negative stereotypes about Jews, such as their alleged responsibility for the death of Jesus.
- Antisemitism was also fuelled by economic competition and political tensions between Jews and non-Jewish Europeans.
What are some borrowed roots of the defining elements of the Holocaust?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
- Nazi racial policies drew on eugenics thinking of the early twentieth century
- the concentration camp evolved from the mass incarceration of PoWs during WWI
- population transfers at the end of WWI provided precedents for the forced displacement of European Jews during the next conflict
- Violence and subjugation of colonialism and early-twentieth-century European wars prepared the way for even more extreme violence.
Was the Holocaust a preordained plan directed from above?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
No, the Holocaust did not unfold as a preordained plan directed from above. German officials regularly responded to changing circumstances and took advantage of unforeseen opportunities. Ordinary folk were eager to profit from the confiscation of Jewish wealth and exclusion of Jews from civil society, which bound them together into an ever-widening circle of perpetrators. Nazi policy towards Jews entailed many redirections and “mental leaps.”
How does Stone’s telling of the Holocaust differ from previous understandings?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
In Stone’s telling, the Holocaust does not unfold as a preordained plan directed from above, but rather German officials regularly responded to changing circumstances and took advantage of unforeseen opportunities.
What was the T4 Euthanasia programme?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
The T4 Euthanasia programme was a Nazi program in which about 70,000 Germans considered to be racially deficient were murdered by medical professionals.
T4 Program, Nazi German effort—framed as a euthanasia program—to kill incurably ill, physically or mentally disabled, emotionally distraught, and elderly people. Adolf Hitler initiated the program in 1939, and, while it was officially discontinued in 1941, killings continued covertly until the military defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945.
What did the failed genocidal plan to deport Jews to the French colony of Madagascar lead to?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
The failed genocidal plan to deport Jews to the French colony of Madagascar laid the ground for the idea of exterminating European Jewry in situ (where Jewish people were already).
What and when was Operation Barbarossa and what was the impact on Jews residing in Soviet territories?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union, which began on June 22, 1941, brought a wave of destruction to 4 million Jews residing in the Soviet territories. Approximately, 1.5 million were able to evacuate or escape deeper into the Soviet Union, leaving around 2.5 million Jews under German-occupation.
What proportion of Jews killed in The Holocaust were murdered by Einsatzgruppen?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
The Nazis and their collaborators murdered the majority of those left behind. Mobile killing units (Einsatzgruppen) followed the German Army, murdering Soviet civilians and Jews one bullet at a time. It is largely unknown that one out of three Jews killed in the Holocaust were murdered by bullets, not in gas chambers.
What is the popular narrative of liberation, and how does Stone’s understanding of it differ?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
The popular narrative of liberation has become skewed, with iconic images of liberation showing survivors who had only just arrived at the camps. Stone shows that liberation did not end the nightmare for many survivors, as they faced difficult circumstances even after leaving the camps.
What challenges were faced by survivors?
What specific places existed for many years after?
Differing Historical Interpretations of The Holocaust
In 1947 there were still 250,000 Jews living in displaced persons’ camps in Germany and Italy. The last DP camp was not dismantled until 1957.
Those who managed to return to their prewar homes often found their houses occupied by former neighbours and their communities and families destroyed.