Historical context of mental health Flashcards
Supernatural explanation 6500BC
1) people believed evil spirits were trapped inside individuals
2) as a punishment from Gods for misdeeds and wrong-doing
Treatment
= exorcisms
= trephination (drilling holes in heads to release evil spirits)
Humoral theory 800BC
1) Hippocrates suggest mental illness have biological causes
2) Caused by imbalances of four bodily humours eg. blood, yellow bile, black bile, phlegm
Treatment - balancing fluids
Emetics - drugs to induce vomiting
Bloodletting - withdrawal of blood
Psychogenic Approach 1800s-1900s
1) Mental illness was due to psychological factors
2) Freud supported this by suggesting its related to unconscious processes in the mind
Treatment
= Psychoanalysis - uncovering unconscious desires
= Free association - express thoughts freely
Somatogenic approach Mid-late 1900s
1) Physical explanations of mental illness eg. abnormal brain structure and genes
2) Serotonin neurotransmitter linked to depression & anxiety
Smaller hippocampus linked to aggression
Treatment
Electroconvulsive therapy - electric currents passed through brain
Drug therapy - Seroxat which changes levels of neurotransmitters in brain
Psychotherapy - part of brains removed
More scientific
> test using MRI cause of brain structures
How to compare similarities between historical views
Debates
= eg. scientific, free will/determinism, reductionism/holism, ethical considerations
Causes
Biological vs Non biological
Aim and Sample of Rosenhan
AIM - to see whether the sane can be distinguished from the insane using the DSM classification system
wanted to see whether clinicians can tell difference between a patient suffering with a real mental disorder vs healthy ‘pseudopatient’
SAMPLE - participants were patients and staff in 5 different states across America in early 1960s. 12 hospitals were used which varied in size, funding and age (generalisable)
Participant observation - pseudo-patients pretended to be real patients, interacted with staff in hospital and recorded activity
Study 1 - Procedure + results + conclusion
1) 8 voluteers including Rosenhan, pretended to be suffering with mental disorder so can be admitted to psychiatric hospital
2) All arrived at different hospitals reporting single symptom ‘hearing voices saying ‘empty’ + ‘hollow’ + ‘thud’. Gave real info about themselves eg. families but gave false name + false occupation (if medical)
3) As soon as they arrived as 8 pseudopatients were in hospitals, they behaved normally
Results
All pseudopatients were admitted (not sane).
Average 19 days before they were released.
One was given diagnosis of schizophrenia in remission + take anti-psychotic drugs
Nurses and doctors mingled with patients as little as possible and little contact time
Conclusion
= psychiatric hospital’s were unable to distinguish those who were sane from insane and that DSM is not a valid measurement of mental illness
Study 2 procedure + results + conclusion
Procedure -
1) staff at one of hospitals were informed of results and found his results hard to believe
2) Rosenhan said in the next 3 months, one or more pseudopatients would attempt to be admitted
3) staff completed a questionnaire using a 10 point scale where 1 reflected high confidence patient was pseudopatient
Results
= 41/193 were judged to be psuedopatient by at least one staff member
= None of pseudopatients were sent to hosiptal
Conclusion
= hospital staff didn’t want to make same errors so went to far other way
= overlap between sane and insane and people can be incorrectly diagnosed
Rosenhan’s experience of hospitalisation
= staff stricly degregated - own living space, bathrooms, dining facilities
= only emerged to give medication, conduct a therapy, group meeting
= doctors were even less available and rarely seen on wards -
Generalisability of Rosenhan
+ range of hospitals around America, using different methods of fundings
+ more generalisable to other psychiatric hospitals at that time in America
- ethnocentric as only looked at diagnosis and hospitals in America
Reliability of Rosenhan [6]
+ psuedopatients reported same symptoms ‘empty’ ‘hollow’ ‘thud’
+ quantitative data eg. how many days psuedopatients spent in hospital, how many times they were ignored - objective and reliable
- qualitative descriptions of pseudopateints would be subjective and unreliable
- went to different hospitals so they didn’t have standardised procedure
- if repeated now, won’t be similar results as DSM has been revised eg. DSM-5
Applications of Rosenhan/ How Mental Hospitals have improved since Rosenhan
+ raised awareness of flaws in psychiatric diagnosis > led to improved diagnostic systems eg. DSM-5 has improved diagnosis
+ improvements in way patients are treated in hospitals - increased contact time between staff and patients
Validity of Rosenhan [6]
HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALDITY
+ conducted in 12 real psychiatric hospitals across multiple states
+participants were real staff in psychiatric hospitals, unaware they were being observed so showed real behaviour
LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY
- pseudopatients weren’t really insane so experiences don’t reflect those of regular patients
- could’ve been bias in observations made by pseudopatients
- pseudopatients spent a lot of time writing down observations on ward,staff, patients which is activity not normally indulged by genuine patients
- psychiatrists would be careful to release someone too quickly when they’ve just been admitted
> reduces validity as its not due to incorrect diagnosis but just cautious psychiatrists
Ethics in Rosenhan
integrity - staff members were deceived
responsibility - protection from harm ( reputation damaged. embarrassed, no debriefing
respect - no informed consent and no right to withdraw (in study 2 consent was involved)
however, Rosenhan did protect anonymity of staff+hospitals afterwards
Rosenhan + socially sensitive research [6]
+ considered as socially sensitive because it questions accuracy of diagnosing mental disorders eg. schizophrenia,
+ could lead to distrust of psychiatry
+ Rosenhan and other 7 volunteers visited 12 psychiatric hospitals pretending to be ill by saying they heard voices ‘empty’ ‘hollow’ ‘thud’. All of them were admitted, wrongly diagnosed as schizophrenic
- there are positive implications of Rosenhan’s research
- led to improved diagnostic systems eg. DSM is constantly revised and improved
- led to patients in hospital being related more humanly
Explain how Rosenhan’s study demonstrates the problems with categorising mental disorders [5]
1) suggests that when people are categorised with a mental disorder using diagnostic systems eg. DSM, the diagnosis lacks validity
2) DSM III was used in Rosenhans study to diagnose pateints. Pseudopatients were mostly diagnosed with schizophrenia after reporting hearing ‘empty’ ‘hollow’ ‘thud’
3) Psychiatrists could not tell pseudopatients were sane and did not have schizophrenia
4) The diagnosis was also difficult to escape and they were released with diagnosis ‘schizophrenia in remission’ so Rosenhan’s study shows problems with categorising mental disorders
How did Rosenhan explain the behaviour of the abusive staff [3]
= Staff felt in a position of power over the patients and this may have led them to believe they could abuse patients
=Staff may have neglected or been rude to patients because they saw them only as patients with schizophrenia and not people with families + lives outside institution
= Staff may have been dismissive to patients as they felt there were no consequences for them as no one would believe what a patient says
Describe ways in which they key research by Rosenhan could have been improved [6]
1) if it had used hospitals in other countries
2) to see whether there are differences in diagnosis of patients or how much label of schizophrenia is stuck with them
4) if it had used pseudo patients reporting a different disorder eg. depression
5) to see if there are differences in diagnosis of people with depression and if label sticks as much as schizophrenia
6) this would improve research by making it more generalisable to other disorders. DSM could be valid for other disorders