Historical background of modern tort law Flashcards

1
Q

True or False

If Simon falls over a log Dale threw onto a road, this is an example of trespass

A

False
It is action on the case
(Reynolds v Clarke)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In Reynolds v Clarke, Justice Fortescue gives the example of a man falling over a log left on a highway as an example of: trespass or action on the case?

A

Action on the case - the injury occurs due to actions that are consequential on the original action of throwing the log on the highway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

True or False

The modern tort of negligence is actionable per se

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who bears the onus of proving or disproving fault in relation to a trespass occurring on a highway?

A

Plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case or Trespass

Proof of material loss or damage is an essential element of…

A

Action on the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Antigone builds a dam on her land that stops water flowing onto Barbara’s land. In doing so, Antigone stops Barbara from gaining the benefit of the water. Does this give rise to an action in the historical tort of…

A

Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

McHale v Watson established which principle?

A

Where the defendant is a child, their age will be relevant to determining whether he or she acted with reasonable care (i.e., was not negligent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The case of ________v________ brought into Australian law the principle that where a plaintiff suffers harm caused directly but negligently by the defendant, the plaintiff may choose to bring the action either in case or in trespass

A

Williams v Milotin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the name of the NSW Court of Appeal case that confirms that it is possible to bring an action for negligent battery? ________v________

A

Croucher v Cachia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Generally, who must disprove fault in trespass cases?

A

Defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In trespass cases occurring on the highway, who must prove both the trespassory act, and the fault element?

A

Plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In trespass cases occurring on the highway, the plaintiff must prove what 2 things?

A
  1. Trespassory act

2. The fault element

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case or Trespass

Directly and intentionally caused harm

A

Trespass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case or Trespass

Directly and negligently caused harm

A

Can choose both trespass and/or on the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case or Trespass

Indirectly and negligently or intentionally caused harm

A

On the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Liability is fault based in which 2 forms?

A
  1. Intention

2. Negligence

17
Q

Negligence is a type of fault as the defendant…

A

Failed to act with reasonable care

18
Q

Intention is a type of fault as the defendant…

A

Intended the consequences of their actions

19
Q

What is the exception to ‘no fault’?

A

Strict liability

20
Q

What needs to be established in strict liability?

A

Whether the defendant did the wrong thing

21
Q

Who bares the onus of proof in action on the case?

A

Plaintiff proves all elements of fault of the defendant

22
Q

Who bares the onus of proof in trespass?

A
  1. Plaintiff to prove trespassory act to prove that it was the defendant who did the trespassory act
  2. Onus then shifts to defendant where they have to prove they are without fault (neither intentionally or negligently)
23
Q

Who bares the onus of proof in negligence actions on the case?

A

Plaintiff bears the onus of proof in every element of negligence

24
Q

What were the rules established in Williams v Holland?

A

Trespass or an action on the case is maintainable for direct injury caused negligently
An action on the case may be brought for direct, negligent injury

25
Q

Actionable per se means….

A

That a tort can be brought without proof of damage

26
Q

What is a negligent trespass?

A

A trespass action may still be brought for a direct, negligent interference (as an alternative to an action on the case for negligence)

27
Q

Battery and assault protects…

A

Bodily integrity

28
Q

The firecracker case of Scott v Shepherd established that…

A

The wrong had to be directly causes on trespass or indirectly caused on the case

29
Q

Defamation protects…

A

Reputation

30
Q

Trespass to land protects…

A

Property rights

31
Q

What are the 4 functions of tort law?

A
  1. Compensation
  2. Appeasement and justice
  3. Deterrence
  4. Punishment
32
Q

Tort claims are subject to which act?

A

Limitations Act 1969 (NSW)

33
Q

What does the Limitations Act 1969 (NSW) do?

A
  1. Sets a certain time limit in which a claim can be brought by plaintiff
  2. Creates different limitation limits for different torts
34
Q

Williams v Holland established the directness rules for trespass which include…

A
  1. Directly and intentionally caused harm: trespass
  2. Directly and negligently caused harm: trespass OR case
  3. Indirectly and negligently or intentionally caused harm: case
35
Q

Which case brought the rule of Williams v Holland into Australian law?

A

Williams v Milotin