High Stalinism 1945-53 Flashcards
What was high Stalinism?
The culmination of Stalin’s regime 1945-1953 when Stalin’s authority over state, party and people and the cult of personality as the face of the dictatorship, reached its peak - Stalin’s dictatorship seemed unchallengeable
Appeared to be a new, more extreme form of dictatorship
What were some of the key features of high Stalinism?
Great emphasis on the role of the leader
High centralised control from Moscow over the P and G
Terror used to control the population
Command economy
Low priority given to the needs of citizens
Strict censorship of media + extensive propaganda
Inequality throughout society e.g. hierarchy both in and out the party
etc
During this time why was Stalin basking in glory?
Following being the heroic leader of the Great Patriotic War, presiding over a new world super power - those around him competed for the privilege of fulfilling his will
Despite seeming the embodiment of totalitarianism why could not even High Stalinism make the USSR a totalitarian state in every respect?
Despite his authority, 175 million people could never be entirely controlled by one man
Stalin’s rule rested on complex bureaucratic structures , balancing between the party and the government and playing off key subordinates against eachother
What had happened to Stalin’s dictatorship during war?
Many aspects of it had been relaxed - persecution of religion was slackened, There had been many appeals to patriotism and national unity. Fear of Stalin’s regime had been overtaken by fear of German invasion so wartime propaganda focused on a ‘better world’ after victory
What happened after the war?
Any tendencies towards liberalisation were obstructed
Wartime institutions were dismantled and the GKO (state defence committee) was dissolved in September 1945
The military hierarchy was also downgraded with Marshall Zhukov downgraded to a minor command
Grip on dictatorship tightened and cult intensified
From 1945 what did Stalin become?
More reclusive and unpredictable - he was ageing and had been centre of power for 25 years
What are the two explanations for high Stalinism?
1) He suffered a mild stroke in 1946 which may have been partly responsible for increasing paranoia in the post war years
2) It was a reversion of the past, not radically new and while his irrational behaviour seemed different from his war time leadership, it was in line with personality traits that had always been present. Some suggested high Stalinism began after murder of Kirov in 1934 - this = a continuation
What is dictatorship?
A form of government in which absolute power is exercised by a single person or small clique
What is totalitarianism?
A political system that demands absolute obedience of the state and that each and every citizen is subject to central state authority, this means that individuals rights and freedoms cannot exist, all forms of human expression must be dictated by the state and everything individual must be submerged into one mass identity
What had Stalin done which continued after 1945 and what is an example?
Played leading figures in the regime off against eachother
Men like Molotov, Malenkov, Mikoyan, Beria and Zhdanov all came in and out of favouring according to Stalin’s desires and scheming rivals
What happened when Zhdanov challenged the policy of Stalin’s closest war-time aid, Malenkov and what did these rivalries help to do?
An investigation under Mikoyan was set up which condemned Malenkov’s actions who then lost his position as party secretary and Zhdanov became Stalin’s closest adviser, until Malenkov and Beria schemed against Zhdanov and engineered his political downfall in 1948
Molotov had great power during and after the war but fell out of favour in 1949
Helped to confirm Stalin’s dominance
Despite the CC and Politburo meeting regularly what was Stalin often able to do?
Bypass both Government and Party and exert direct central authority
How were the Party and its institutions undermined?
No Party congresses were held 1939-52
The Politburo was reduced to an advisory body which waited to be told by Stalin or his spokesperson what ‘official’ line was to be followed
The big decisions were taken in ad hoc gatherings of Stalin’s inner circle
Despite party membership remaining high what were members more/ less likely to be?
Less likely to be committed ideologists from the ranks of peasants or workers
The ‘new’ men were obedient bureaucrats who did not show any initiative and avoided ideological debates as Inertia (leaving things as they were) was a key feature of High Stalinism
What else was High Stalinism characterised by?
A revival of terror
What did Stalin ruthlessly enforce and how ?
Isolation from the non-Soviet world - partly out of concern for national security at a time of the emerging cold war but also due to an obsessive fear of ideological contamination e.g. Stalin’s harsh treatment of prisoners of war and his purges of former army officers, even relatives of those who had spent time outside of the USSR were considered suspect
Anyone with knowledge of the outside world
What is an example of dangerous knowledge?
Leopold Trepper, a Polish communist who risked his life as a key member of the Red Orchestra, the left-wing spy ring inside Nazi Germany, upon his return he was awarded a medal as a hero of the SU and immediately after was arrested and deported to a gulag until 1955
What was terror like inside the USSR and where especially?
Especially in newly incorporated areas (e.g. Baltic States) as people needed to show unwavering loyalty
Careless words or brief contact with a foreigner could get a person, denounced, arrested and in a gulag
Even friends might be a possible informer against an individual
In Feb 1947 a law was passed outlawing marriages to foreigners
What else happened within the USSR?
Hotels, restaurants and embassies were under surveillance with police watching meetings between soviet girls and foreign men - terror was pervasive, innocence was no defence in a secret police state
Who was Beria and what was he responsible for?
He was head of the security apparatus in the post war-years
Not only NKVD chief but also deputy prime minister, a full member of the Politburo and the man in charge if developing a Soviet atomic bomb
As Head of the NKVD he presided over the vast expansion of prison labour camps in the Gulag
His psychopathic, sadistic personality left a mark on the USSR