Hermeneutics Final Exam Flashcards

1
Q
  1. Define and distinguish between authorial intention and reader response.
A

Authorial intent is what the author was meaning to come across to the audience while reader response is how the person reading responds to the material. The question asked by the reader “what does this mean,” bi-passing what the author meant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. (Define author, meaning and application as they relate to biblical interpretation.)
A

Author is the person who wrote it, meaning is what the author meant when writing and application is the what the reader should take from the core idea of the text and apply to their everyday life. (Maybe on the test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. (Explain the relationship between general, universal theological truths and concepts-specific theological truths.)
A

Universal theological truths - are like truths for all ages at all times.
Concepts-specific theological truths – These are truths specific to the situation and context in the bible. (Not on the test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Explain the primary danger of seeking a deeper, spiritual meaning in the biblical text.
A

When we seek a deeper spiritual meaning, we usually find ourselves moving into an area of reader response. Were we are the ones determining the meaning rather than the text. We can often miss completely the message God has intended and substitute our words for His.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Distinguish between allegory and allegorical interpretation.
A

An allegory is a story that uses an extensive amount of symbolism. It is similar to a parable but generally has a greater degree of correspondence. While allegorical interpretation as an interpretive method is quite different from allegory, and it can mislead us completely if we use it to interpret a nonallegorical text. (not on the test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Define typology and foreshadowing.
A

Foreshadowing is something that can be between any part of the bible and is pointing to a future even while Typology is foreshadowing but specifically from the Old Testament into the new and generally needs a correspondence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. Define inspirations and illumination. Explain how these two works of the spirit work together.
A

Inspiration refers to Gods work in human authors. Illumination is the Holy Spirit showing us or highlighting something. Since the Spirit inspired scripture in the first place, we should not expect him to contradict himself when he illuminates things to us. ( not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. State and describe the five characteristics and the three parts of the New Testament letter.
A

The first is characteristic is comparable to other ancient letters… they were much longer than the usual, but the added length makes sense considering that they were trying to shepherd their flocks from a distance. Second is Authoritative substitutes for personal presence… This was the way they communicated when they could not be there in person. Third is Situational… They were written to address certain situations. Forth is carefully written and delivered… Normally done by a trained scribe and was a complex thing the end written by the author. Fifth is Intended for the Christian community… They were meant to be read aloud to specific congregations.
The three parts of the New Testament letter are Introduction, Body and conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Explain why Mathew, Mark, and Luke are called the synoptic gospels. (Maybe)
A

They tell a similar story of Jesus’s life but from their point of view and perspectives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is the Gospel John not a synoptic Gospel?

A

John wrote with the intent of proving Jesus’s divinity. Because of this it was not written chronologically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. State and apply the two interpretive questions that allow passages from the gospels to be read rightly.
A
  1. What does this small story tell us about Jesus? 2. What is the gospel writer trying to say to his readers by the way that he puts smaller stories together?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Identify and describe the special literary terms found in the Gospels. What is the key to interpreting each special literary form?
A

A. Exaggeration or Hyperbole 2. Metaphor and simile. 3. Narrative Irony. 4. Rhetorical questions. 5. Parallelism 6. Parables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Form of the gospel: Exaggeration/Hyperbole

A

Is used to drive a pint home and is not meant to be taken literally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Form of Gospel: Metaphor and simile

A

They compare to prove a point.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Form of Gospel: narrative

A

Is irony is contrasting between what is expected to happen and what actually happens or something with an unexpected twist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

form of the Gospel: Rhetorical

A

Rhetorical Question
Not looking for an answer but making a strong statement.

17
Q

Form of the Gospel: Parallelism

A

Describes a relationship between two or more lines of text.

18
Q

Form of the Gospel: Parables/ A story with two meanings

A

Parable often used by Jesus telling a hypothetical story filled with meaning. Need to be careful to not do above mentioned thing: reader response deep meaning.

19
Q

What is the relationship between Luke and Acts?

A

Acts is a continuation of Luke. The ending of Luke overlaps the beginning of Acts. They are really two parts of a single story.

20
Q
  1. Describe the significance of designating Acts as theological history.
A

Luke composes a reliable record of what happened in the outreach of the gospel, written with the goal of advancing the faith. Luke arranged acts for theological purposes.

21
Q

What is normative in acts

A

Things in the church that are to be used in the church today. it is imitating the experiences and practices of the early church at all times.

22
Q

What is descriptive in acts

A

If something is Descriptive it is only applicable to the early church. Is what was valuable or inspiring but is not of the church today.

23
Q

Three main characters of acts. Divine and two human

A

Holy Spirit, Peter, Paul.

24
Q

Both and approach of Descriptive and normative explained why this is better.

A

Some things are meant for the early church while some are applicable to both and necessary.

25
Q

Literary genres that comprise revelation. there is three. the first is…

A

Revelation is a letter: it opens like a typical letter in the New Testament.

26
Q

Second literary genre of Revelation.

A

It is prophetic: Prophesy, the proclamation and prediction of the second coming of Christ.

27
Q

Third literary genre of Revelation

A

It is a prophetic Apocalyptic letter: is divine revelation from God intervening in human history establishing his kingdom and getting rid of evil empires.

28
Q

Purpose of Revelation

A

Written by John, its purpose is tied up in it being a prophetic-apocalyptic letter with images. Revelation answered the question “who is Lord” during times of persecution. The main message is “God’s will will win”! It offers encouragement and perspective of what is to come.

29
Q

There is four traditional approaches to interpret revelation.

A

Preterist: Seen in context of many thing already fulfilled in 1 century.
Historicist: An outline or map what has/will happen through church history. From 1 Cent-Return.
Futurist: Most all future events.
Idealist: Not time but instead ongoing struggle of good and evil.

30
Q

GGW writers approach the interpretation of Revelation as

A

Eclectic: Takes many things from the other approaches and combines them. Takes context and future stuff.

31
Q

Traditional approach to interpreting Old Testament Laws.

A

Moral: those aimless truths. Civil: was more court laws and ceremonial laws: where for sacrifices and such.

32
Q

2 Flaws with the traditional approach Old Testament interpretation.

A

First - there is no distinction in the text .
second - Difficult to determine whether a law falls into what category.

33
Q
  1. Describe the role of narrative and covenant context in interpreting Old Testament law.
A

The laws have a significant role to play in the narrative they are placed in. It is also important to remember the role of the mosaic covenant in light of these laws.

34
Q
  1. Identify the basic elements of the Old Testament poetry
A

Minimal number of words or 1. Terseness. 2. Parallelism. 3. Synonymous, similar meanings between lines. 4. Developmental. 5. Contrastive. 6. Formal. 7. Acrostics- alphabetical. 8. Figurative language. 9. Simile. 10. Indirect analogy. 11. Hyperbole, 12. exaggeration. 13. Personification.14. Zoomorphism. 15. Anthropomorphism. 16. Representation. 17. Apostrophe. 18. Irony. 19. Wordplays.

35
Q
  1. Distinguish between the types of parallelism used in Old Testament poetry.
A
35
Q
  1. State the three prophetic messages. List and explain the three indictments brough against the people of Israel?
A
  1. You have broken covenant; you better repent. 2. No repentance; then judgment. 3. Yet there is hope beyond the judgment for a glorious future restoration.

Things brought against them Idolatry, social injustices and religious ritualism.

36
Q
  1. Explain the primary purpose of wisdom literature?
A

Wisdom literature has a strong practical tone. It makes the suggestion that living a godly life involves solid commonsense choices. The combination of knowledge and character allowing people to live in the real world in a godly manner.

37
Q
  1. Describe the unique perspective of each of the four wisdom books
A

Proverbs: rational order of everyday life. Job: Events occur that humans cannot always grasp. Ecclesiastes: intellectual search for meaning in life. Song of Songs: wild, irrational aspects of true love.

37
Q

Not exactly but maybe on the test) Articulate how Song of Songs has been interpreted throughout the history of the church?

A

They have said without the context and all that it was a picture of Christ and the church allegorizing the whole thing.