Hermann and Tarnow Flashcards

1
Q

Hermann looked at?

A

Crestal bone levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tarnow looked at?

A

inter-implant distances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

consequence of loosing peak of bone if implants placed too close together? loss of interdental bone will result in..?

A

with loss of the inter-dental bone height/ crest you get an esthetic problem as well recession and loss of the gingiva/ papilla inter-proximally

POOR ESTHETICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

minimum distance needed when placing adjacent implants? what does this prevent?

A

3mm he is saying it will prevent the loss of the CREST OF BONE INBETWEEN

*NOT SAYING IT WILL PREVENT BONE LOSS FROM OCCURING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Major assumption Tarnow made? relationship to the Hermann study?

A

that bone loss is inevitable – meaning it will always happen

Hermann said you can avoid bone loss depending on the type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

schematic of hermann design

A
  1. extracted
  2. implants 6 weeks later
  3. abutment placed 3 weeks after that
  4. sacrifice and looked at histologically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

which implant showed no bone loss?

A

Type A – tissue level implant as it is significantly above the crest of bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what guarantees bone loss will occur?

A

if the interface is at the crest of bone or submerged apical to the crest of bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why did Tarnow always see bone loss?

A

Because he put every implant AT THE CREST OF BONE – so if place it at the crest of bone you are guaranteeing bone loss to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does submerged mean?

A

when placing the implant you put the soft tissue back over it and had primary closure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

original branemark said you got bone loss when?

A

not at the time of placing the implant but subsequent to the screwing in of the abutment

so when patient came back to put the abutment on - the crest of bone was at the same level then when you took radiogrpah of the abutment you ALWAYS had bone loss after a period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hermann’s conclusions

A

the location of the abutment interface relative to the implant is crucial whether or not you will have bone loss in the future or not and also the location of the roughened surface or polished collar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

if you have polished collar it should always be where?

A

coronal to the bone because it can lead to bone loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hermann assumptions

A

canine model translates to the human model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

do the studies compliment eachother?

A

that you will get bone loss ineviteably if you use the certain design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

implications of Tarnow study

A

If using implant like tarnow used – expect bone loss and expect to lose the peak of bone between as well if place them closer than 3mm

17
Q

if placing a supra-crestal implant what are we most concerned with?

A

what surface is that is supra-crestal

18
Q

implications of sub crestal and at the crest for implants

A

will get bone loss

19
Q

if supra crestal surface is roughneded what are the implications

A

potential for plaque build up

20
Q

platform switching use?

general

A

try to combat the problem that we see with implant placements like Tarnows

brings interface FURTHER AWAY from the EDGE OF THE IMPLANT IN A HORIZONTAL DIRECTION

21
Q

which direction is being manipulated in platform switching

A

HORIZONTAL

brings interface FURTHER AWAY from the EDGE OF THE IMPLANT IN A HORIZONTAL DIRECTION

22
Q

solutions for limiting bone loss (2 we discussed)

A
  1. interface between abutment and implant more coronal

2. platform switching

23
Q

describe the platform switching **

A

method used to preserve alveolar bone levels around dental implants

placing screwed or friction fit restorative abutments of NARROWER DIAMETER in implants of wider diameter

24
Q

platform matching and implications

A

when the implant and abutment interface is matched in a horizontal direction so it lines up – results in more bone loss

25
Q

if platform switch and place at crest of bone?

A

likley no bone loss

26
Q

location of polished collar

A

coronal to crest always - so when place the abutment it sits above crest of bone and then no bone loss

27
Q

alveolar ridge resoprtion occurs a lot of times from what?

A

denture wearing related problems

28
Q

require a complete denture what should always be recommended?

A

implant supported dentures – as we see a lot of ridge resorption with denture wearing

PREVENTING THE ADDITIONAL RESORPTION OF THE RIDGE FROM WEARING A DENTURE