Hemophilia Flashcards
Define Mild, Moderate and Severe Hemophilia
Mild - 5-40%
Moderate - 1-5%
Severe - <1%
What is Hemophilia B Leyden?
Hemophilia B Leyden is a mutation affecting the Factor IX Promoter. This is influenced by sex hormones, so the disease phenotype will become more mild as the patient ages.
A) How many males have severe hemophilia A?
B) How many males have severe hemophilia B?
C) How many female carriers have a mild hemophilia phenotype?
A) 50-66%
B) 33-50%
C) 25%
What cut-off is required to affect the PTT (Factor level)
Under 15% for Hemophilia A, maybe less for B
What is serious bleeding in Hemophilia?
How do you manage it?
Serious bleeding:
CNS bleeds, including eyes, Deep muscular bleeds, Hip bleeds, Bleeding severe enough to need pRBC, Bleeding that could affect organ function (airway), Intra-abdominal/GI bleeding, Iliopsoas bleeds, Failure of conservative therapy, Trauma bleeding
Management:
Factor should immediately be brought to >100%, and maintained thereafter >50%. This is done by providing Factor replacement at the half-life of the factor (8-12hrs for FVIII, 18-24hrs for FIX)
How do you treat Hemarthrosis in Hemophilia?
What is the in-vivo recovery of FVIII and FIX
FVIII has an in-vivo recovery of 2 units per 1 unit/kg provided.
I.e. for a 60kg patient trying to raise to 100% activity you would give (60x0.5x100) or 3000 units
FIX has an in-vivo recovery of 1 unit per 1 unit/kg provided.
I.e. for a 60kg patient trying to raise to 100% activity you would give (60x1x100) or 6000 units
How if factor activity on Emicizumab measured?
A BOVINE Chromogenic Factor VIII assay must be used. Standard FVIII assay is non-reliable.
How long should treatment for a bleed be given for:
A) Hemarthrosis
B) Target joint
C) Muscular bleed / Deep Laceration (not iliopsoas)
D) Iliopsoas bleed
E) CNS bleed
F) Serious site bleed (GI/Neck/Intra-abdominal)
G) Major OR
A) Target ~50 for 1-2d
B) Target 100 for 1-2d
C) Target ~50 for 2-3d
D) Target 100 for d1-d2, THEN MAINTAIN >50 for d3-d5 (5d)
E) Target 100 for 1wk, THEN MAINTAIN >50 for a further 2 weeks (3 weeks total)
F) Target 100 for 1wk, THEN MAINTAIN >50 for a further 1 week (2 weeks total)
G) Pre-op Target ~100 (60-80 for HemB), and then maintain >50 until wound healing (10-14d - 2 weeks total)
In general we target >100 for severe bleeding/target joint, and >50 for other site bleeds. Maintenance then depends on the site, with Serious Site and CNS typically continued for anywhere from 5d to 3 weeks. For less “severe” bleeding like hemarthrosis or muscular can continue unless bleeding stopped. Consider prophylaxis afterwards for patients not on it already.
Define a target joint
3 or more bleeds into a joint within the preceding 6 months
How do we treat bleeding in Hemophilia patients with Inhibitors?
If Inhibitor is weak (always been <5BU) can consider higher dose replacement
If inhibitor is strong (has been >5BU at ANY point) then need a bypass agent:
Can use either aPCC or rFVIIa EXCEPT in Emicizumab patients, where rFVIIa should be given due to TMA documented in patients receiving aPCC. If aPCC is given NO MORE than 100 units/kg in any 24 hour period should be given.
What is high-dose Factor replacement?
For patients with <5BU inhibitors can try high-dose replacement. This is done as:
Replace to 100%, then give a further 50% dosing for every 1 BU.
I.e. for a 60kg patient with an inhibitor of 3BU we give
(0.5 x 60 x 100) + (3 x 0.5 x 60 x 50) = 3000 + 4500 = 7500 units
Which patients are most at risk of developing inhibitors?
Why?
Patients with Hemophilia A or severe disease
Typically because HA has gene deletions as opposed to inhibiting point mutations in HB, therefore antigenic portions are missing from the FVIII in HA patients. Severe disease because there is very low level of factor circulating, so may not become tolerant to FVIII/FIX.
Is there preference for recombinant or plasma-derived factor replacement?
In general, no. The SIPPET trial demonstrated more inhibitors with Recombinant vs PD
Critiques: Not all patients followed out to 50 Exposure days, Newer generation Recombinant was poorly represented, done in a mostly Egyptian population so uncertainty of applicability to general population.
WFH currently makes no recommendations on PD vs Recombinant
What are 6 risk factors for inhibitor development
Age at first exposure (debated) Inflammation during exposures (i.e. on-demand vs prophylactic) Dose intensity and frequency Number of exposures Immune response genes
Severity of disease phenotype
Hemophilia A > Hemophilia B
Black ethnic background
POSSIBLY Recombinant vs PD products