Hemispheric lateralisation and split-brain research Flashcards
Describe language functions.
Localised AND lateralised
- Language is left hemisphere only – analyser
- The right hemisphere contributes to the emotional context of what is being said – synthesiser
Describe motor functions.
Motor functions
localised NOT lateralised
- Cross wiring occurs in the motor area – this is called
- Contralateral (opposite sides)
Describe visual functions.
Visual functions
localised AND lateralised
- LVF – processed in the right hemisphere
- RVF- processed in the left hemisphere
- Vision is contralateral (opposite sides) but also ipsilateral (same sides)
Evaluate.
+ Research support: Fink et al used PET scans and found that when people a neurotypical brain completed a visual task the right hemisphere was more active/dominant for global elements (e.g., a forest) but the left hemisphere was more active/dominant for finer detail e.g. specific trees).
-Contradictory research: Nielsen et al analysed brain scans of over 1000 people (aged 7-29 years) and found people used different hemispheres for different tasks but no evidence of a dominant side.
+Research support: Lateralisation is adaptive as can lead to two tasks being performed better. Research showed lateralised chickens could find food whilst watching for predators.
- Counterpoint: Neuroplasticity is adaptive as after trauma shows functions can be adaptive and taken over by non-specialised areas in the right hemisphere.
Outline Sperry’s split-brain research.
11 participants who were epileptics and had their corpus callosum split.
Procedure:
Drawing task:
- Word/image is projected to the left visual field and participant has to draw what they saw. PPs drew but could not say the word/image.
Visual task
-Word/ image is projected onto right visual field and participant is asked to describe what they saw. PPs could describe image.
Conclusions:
- The left hemisphere is dominant in terms of speech and language.
- The right hemisphere is dominant in terms of visual-motor tasks.
Evaluate.
+ Case study: Kim Peek had an amazing memory for dates which suggests semantic memory could be lateralised.
- Counterpoint: Kim Peek was born WITHOUT a corpus callosum. He could read from both pages of a book. This suggests he had two language centres.
- Sperry’s research was not compared to a neurotypical control group therefore the differences could have been due to the confounding variable of epilepsy.
+ Counterpoint: Research with control group supports the idea that the left hemisphere and right hemisphere are distinct. The split brain patients were faster at odd one out tasks.