Hearsay Exceptions and Exclusions Flashcards

1
Q

Present Sense Impression

Elements (3)

R. 803(1)

A
  1. A statement describing the event/condition
  2. Made while perceiving it
  3. Or immediately thereafter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Excited Utterance

Elements (3)

R. 803(2)

A
  1. Statement made under stress of excitement
  2. Caused by a startling event/condition
  3. And related to event condition

Federal rules: declarent’s stress evaluated subjectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State of Mind

Elements (2)

R. 803(3)

A
  1. Statement of declarant’s then-existing
    • State of mind
    • Emotional condition
    • Sensory condition (pain)
    • Sensory condition (pain)
  2. Not including memory of belief to prove the fact remembered or belief (unless it relates to validity of declarant’s will: “I ripped up my will and cut out Jim” is an exception to prohibiting memories)

Also used for statements of intention; can also be used to prove intentions of another! (I’m going to CO with Hillmon -> Hillmon went to CO w/ declarant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Medical Diagnosis or Treatment

Elements (3)

803(4)

A
  1. Made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment
  2. Reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment
  3. Describes:
    • Medical history
    • past or present symptoms
    • inception
    • or general cause

PA: medical/hospital records ONLY to show facts of injury. and prescribed treatment; purely diagnostic exams or second opinions are outside exception; more narrow exception than Federal rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Past Recollection Recorded

Elements (5)

R. 803(5)

A

1) Is on a matter the witness once knew about
2) But cannot recall well enough (forgetful witness)
3) Was made or adopted by the witness
4) When the matter was fresh in memory
5) AND accurately reflects the witness’s knowledge

PA: declarant testimony is required; must testify that record accurately reflects knowledge at time of making record.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Business Records

Elements (5)

R. 803(6)

A
  1. Made at or near time of act/event/condition
  2. By someone with knowledge
  3. Or from w/ info transmitted by someone with knowledge acting under a duty to impart such info in the regular course of business
  4. Made and kept in the course of regularly conducted activity
  5. No showing by opponent of untrustworthiness

Absense of records:

  • FRE says lack of a record is admissible if normally would have been recorded, unless circumstances show lack of trustworthiness
  • PA says absence of record is not hearsay (and thus not a hearsay exception and can be admissible as circumstantial evidence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Public Records

Elements (2)

R. 803(8)

A

1) Is a record of public office setting out
a) Internal, administrative activities of the office
b) A matter observed while under legal duty to report (except by law enforcement in a criminal case.)
c) Factual findings from legally authorized investigation (except where offered against accused in a criminal case.)
2) No showing of untrustworthiness.

PA: no hearsay exception, but may be excepted as business records . By statute, public records and vital statistics are excepted from HS rules and provides for authentication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Former Testimony

Elements (3)

R. 804(b)(1)

A

1) Testimony was given in a prior hearing
2) By an unavailable declarant
3) There was a opportunity and similar motive to develop the former testimony (by cross, direct exam, or re-direct)

  • by the party against whom it is now offered or
  • a predecessor in interest in a civil case

PA: party need to have had “adequate” opportunity to develop testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dying Declaration

Elements (4)

R. 804(b)(2)

A

1) Statement by an unavailable declarant
2) Made while believing death to be imminent
3) About its cause or circumstances
4) In homicide prosecution or any civil case

PA: can invoke this in ANY kind of case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Statement Against Interest

Elements (5)

R. 804(b)(3)

A

1) Statement by an unavailable declarant
2) So contrary to declarant’s interest when made that
3) A reasonable person would’ve made statement only if declarant believed to be true
4) The interest involved must be:

· Pecuniary (“I owe John $1M”)

· Proprietary (“This land belongs to John.”)

· Effects civil liability (“I was at fault in that accident.”)

· Penal (“I shot the sheriff.”)

5) If used against penal interest in a criminal case, the circumstances must clearly indicate statement’s trustworthiness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Opposing Party Admissions: Adoptive Admissions

Elements (2)

801(d)(2)(B).

A

1) A statement by another
2) that opposing party either adopts statement or believes it to be true.

Includes silence as adoption, if reasonable person would have said something to contradict statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Opposing Party Admissions: Authorized Statement

Elements (2)

801(d)(2)(C)

A

1) Statement made by a person authorized by opposing party
2) make a statement on the subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Opposing Party Admissions: Agent Statement

Elements (3)

801(d)(2)(D)

A

1) Made by opposing party’s agent/employee
2) On a matter within scope of relationship
3) During the relationship’s existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Opposing Party Admissions: Co-Conspirator Statement

Elements (3)

801(d)(2)(E)

A

1) Made by the opposing party’s co-conspirator
2) During the conspiracy
3) In furtherance of the conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prior Identification

Elements (4)

R. 801(d)(1)(C)

A

1) The statement identifies a person
2) As someone the declarant perceived earlier
3) The Declarant must testify
4) And be subject to cross-examination about the prior statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Statement of Personal or Family History

R 804(b)(4)

A

Federal: can introduce statements of declarant’s personal or family history, even if declarant had no way of acquring such personal knowledge

PA: Statement must also have been made before the controversy arose. Need not be related to person the subject of statement, but merely be close enough to family to have accurate information.

17
Q

6th A limitations on hearsay

A

Constitutional limitation of hearsay based on 6th A: “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witness against him”

Testimonial HS is admissible ONLY if:

  1. Declarant is unavailable
  2. Prior opportunity to cross exam

What is testimonial hearsay? Eval under primary purpose test: intended to aid with trial or prosecution, or made for immediate police assistance?

Note: 6th A right to confrontation can be waived if declarant’s unavailability was intentionally caused by defendant.