Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Lit > Hearsay Evidence > Flashcards

Hearsay Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Under s114 - what are the 4 categories of admissible evidence which is not made orally in court

A
  • any provision of statute
  • rule of common law preserved by s118
  • all parties agree
  • interests of justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of hearsay evidence?

A

statement relied upon as evidence of any matter stated - matter stated = purpose (or one of) on part of statement maker to cause person to believe the matter or a person or machine to behave as though it were as stated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is definition of a statement?

A

any representation of fact or opinion made by any person - including sketch, photofit etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What can a witnesses previous statement be admitted to prove if not fact of the matter?

A

(in)consistency - prohibited if entirely self serving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is mechanically produced evidence treated?

A

as not ‘made by a person’ then not hearsay, any witness who has seen such footage/heard a recording will also be treated as having had direct sight of the action and therefore can give evidence on that directly
any human input - if not supported by evidence - renders it hearsay e.g digital photofit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are calls made by a person to another whom they believe to already know the facts - eg requesting drugs - hearsay where intercepted?

A

no, as no intention to cause recipient to believe/act a certain way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the test in Twist for determining whether a statement is hearsay?

A

1 - ascertain matter which is to be proven
2 - assuming matter sought to be proven is relevant - was a statement of the matter made? if yes = hearsay
3 - if no statement of matter made - was one of the purposes to cause recipient to believe/act as if it were true? if yes = hearsay if no=not hearsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

where might statements not be directed at another and therefore not hearsay?

A

private diary or notes - careful where considering whether there was an intended audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is it possible for evidence to be admissible for one but not another charge on indictment for example?

A

yes - admissible to prove something other than the matter stated - can be allowable for only one charge - would be a factor to consider where considering whether to try charges separately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Are statements as to an individuals’ state of mind hearsay?

A

yes
however statement from which state of mind could be inferred are not - eg description of observed behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

do hearsay rules apply to statements relevant to why a person took a certain course of action

A

no - e.g giving evidence of threats made by terrorist - not to prove threats true but to show why D behaved in a way they did having feared death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

is evidence given on solicitors advice hearsay?

A

no - where adduced to show why D behaved in a certain way - yes if trying to prove truth of matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what may a statement be used to prove without infringing hearsay?

A

knowledge of the maker - e.g denies brothel , but sought to place advert for it weeks before

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

are lies and untrue statements admissible?

A

demonstrably false statement - lie cannot be hearsay of a matter it is not intended to assert - eg false alibi evidently false - what matters is that it was said

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what additional 3 safeguards are in place for considering admissibility of hearsay ?

A

s124 - testing of credibility where maker does not attend s125 - power to stop case where evidence unconvincing s126 - discretion to exclude hearsay (plus s78)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what 6 stage steps gives an approach to testing admissibility of statement?

A
  • is there a stat gateway? (ss116-118)
  • What material is there which help to test or assess the hearsay? (s124)
  • is there a specific interests of justice test ?
  • if no justification or gateway - should evidence nevertheless be considered in interests of justice? (s114(1)(d)
  • even if prima facie admissible, ought it be ruled inadmissible? (s78 PACE or s126 CJA)
  • if evidence is admitted, should the case be stopped under s125 ?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

when should direction to counsel/jury be given on hearsay

A

deal with reasoning for admission/exclusion with counsel so they can tailor speeches/make submissions
give direction to jury prior to giving evidence and again at summing up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What hearsay excpetion is covered in s116

A

witness is unavailable

19
Q

how might a witness be deemed ‘unavailable’ in s116

A
  • dead
  • unfit to be a witness
  • outside of the country and not reasonably practicable to secre attendance
  • cannot be found , all reasonable steps taken
  • through fear person does not give evidence - no requirement for fear to be of D - but FEAR must be cause - leave only if in interest of justice
20
Q

what are the constraints on s116

A

apply to be first hand hearsay only, person must be identified and contents must be clearly their direct recollection and not hearsay in itself
cannot be relied upon where something done to prevent that person from attending (even if just one of many causes) eg threat from D caused W to flee country

21
Q

what may a court do where a witness has died

A

proceed straight to considering fairness

22
Q

what must a court do where a witness is said to be unfit

A

further investigate to ensure condition met - unable to understand/communicate evidence

23
Q

what may the appropriate consequence of ‘sudden unfitness’ be - for example due to hospitalisation

A

may refuse adjournment but must consider application under s116 at all

24
Q

what is conisdered ‘reasonable’ steps to secure attendance/find witness

A

depends on circs, prosecution must be able to present specific and compelling evidence of every reasonable step taken, reasons will be taken into account - keep in touch, prevent loosing them, explain duty
evidence of absence from country must be secured - that is not just hearsay itself

25
Q

what might be a practical solution to not being able to secure in person attendance

A

video link

26
Q

Why is it precarious for an accused to object to fairness of admitting hearsay under intimidation exception

A

if they have created such intimidation they should not benefit from it

27
Q

should a witness be assured their statement could be read if afraid?

A

no - deffo not - all possible routes to get them to court should be explored incs content of statement , risk to fairness and special measures

28
Q

what class of statement is given exception under s117

A

business documents - including medical records, police statements

29
Q

what extra provision under s117 applies to documents prepared for criminal proceedings

A

one of 5 conditions in s116 should be present OR person who supplied the document cannot reasonably be expected to have any recollection of matters contained in it

30
Q

how can a document then be presented in court?

A

without elaboration or improvement

31
Q

what factors must a court have regard to when considering interests of justice under s114(1)(d)

A
  • probative value of statement
    -other evidence of the matter mentioned
    -importance of statement to the case as a whole
    -circumstances in which the statement was made
  • how reliable the statement maker appears to be
  • how reliable evidence of the making of the statement is
  • whether oral evidence could be given
  • difficulty involved in challenging the statement
  • extent to which any difficulty would prejudice a party
32
Q

how should consideration of the s114(1)(d) factors be conducted

A

no need for all - go deeper into highlighted factors and any other prevalenet consideration

33
Q

what caution is applied to ss114(1)(d)

A

‘interests of justice’ - is to be applied as a safety valve only and not as a work around

34
Q

what common law exception does s118 preserve

A

public documents and information - to prove facts of matter concerned
Res Gestae - overpowering emotion cannot result in distortion or concoction, accompanying act or physical sensation or state of mind
confessions/admissions
furtherance of common enterprise
expert to draw on body of expertise

35
Q

what must a judge make clear to jury when directing on res gestae

A

spontaneous statement has been admitted
for jury to decide what was said and must be sure witness cannot have been mistaken
must be satisfied declarant did not concoct out of malice
attention to special features

36
Q

what is admissible under furtherance of common enterprise

A

statement made by a party to a common enterprise against another party as evidence of matter stated
chiefly conspiracy cases but not limited

37
Q

when is a hearsay statement admissible to prove fact that an earlier hearsay statement was made ?

A
  • admissibility under statute (s117,119, 120) - NOT 116/common law
  • agreement of all parties
  • interests of justice
    wider def of hearsay - statement relied on as evidence of matter in it - not made in oral evidence
38
Q

what is opposing party entitled to put in ebvidence to counterbalance absence of XX for hearsay statements under s124?

A

anything which would have been admisisble if witness had been present AND evidence for things which witnesses word would have been final on
inconsistency
credibility

39
Q

can s78 PACE be applied (exclusion in interest of justice)

A

yes - positive duty on court to implement if appears issue determined by unconvinving hearsay - rule in advance or during

40
Q

what should judge do where hearsay consitutes principle evidence for issue eg identification

A

consider context , ensure counterbalancing measures have been explored, give appropriate directions on any inconsistency or danger of relying entirely upon it

41
Q

what control measure does s126 put in place for hearsay?

A

court has power to refuse to admit if made outside of oral evidence, there is a case for excluding it and it would result in an undue waste of time - e.g unconvincing/superfluous hearsay

42
Q

what control measure is contained in s125

A

power to stop trial at any point after close of prosecution case where based wholly or partly on hearsay so unconvincing that conviction would be unsafe - even for lesser offence if same applieswh

43
Q

which hearsay applications require notice

A

s114(1)(d) - interests of justice
s116 - witness unavailable
s117(1)(c) - statements prepared for crim poceedings
s121 - multiple hearsay

44
Q

what are notice periods in Mags and CC?

A

Prosecutor
Mags - 20 business days
CC - 10 business days

Defence
ASAP

serve on all parties - can be waived or altered

Criminal Lit (21 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions