Hearsay Flashcards
What is hearsay?
Hearsay is an out of court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted.
If you offer a statement to impeach your witness does it have to meet one of the hearsay exceptions in order to be admissible only for this purpose?
No, because it’s not being used for the truth of the matter asserted.
What is the general rule regarding admissibility of hearsay evidence?
All hearsay is inadmissible unless an exception or an exclusion applies.
Aside from written or spoken assertions what other forms of hearsay may be tested?
Conduct intended as an assertion (e.g. raising hand to answer a question)
What are the elements of hearsay?
- It is a statement
- Made by a person, not a machine or animal
- Made out of court
- Being offered to prove the matter asserted.
If a person tries to admit a statement to show the effect on the listener (I.E.that someone had notice), will this be hearsay?
Name the other 3 ways a statement can be offered into evidence and typically won’t be for its truth.
No, statements offered to show affect on a listener are not hearsay.
The other three typical non-hearsay purposes are:
— Impeachment
— Verbal acts / acts of independent legal significance
— evidence of declarant’s state of mind
Which common verbal acts will not be here say because they have independent legal significance?
Defamation
Transactional language
Transfers of land
Which are the five categories of hearsay that are EXCLUDED from the hearsay rule?
Remember: C O P P P
Co–conspirator statements
Opposing party statements
Prior inconsistent statements
Prior consistent statements
Prior statements of identification
Which of the hearsay exclusions require: (1) the declarant to testify, and (2) the declarant to be subject to cross-examination?
The 3 Ps, so:
Prior inconsistent statements
Prior consistent statements
Prior statements of identification
What are the requirements to rely on the hearsay EXCLUSION of co-conspirator statements/ what do you have to prove?
The judge must find a preponderance of the evidence that:
– a CONSPIRACY existed
– the DECLARANT was a MEMBER of the conspiracy
– statement made DURING THE COURSE of the conspiracy
– IN FURTHERANCE of the conspiracy
– statement now offered AGAINST a party opponent/ MEMBER of this conspiracy
Will the statement alone be enough to prove a conspiracy existed for the purposes of relying on the co-conspirator hearsay exclusion?
No, you need some other evidence of a conspiracy.
In order to prove the conspiracy (for the purposes of relying on the hearsay exclusion of co-conspirator statement), does there need to be a charge of conspiracy
No, the statement is admissible even if conspiracy is not yet charged
For which type of proceedings are co-conspirators statements admissible?
Civil or criminal.
What is an opposing party statement?
Any statement
Made at any point by the PARTY OF THE CURRENT CASE
Maybe OFFERED BY the PARTY OPPONENT
For the truth of the matter cited
Broadly speaking, Opposing party statements can be made in which two circumstances?
An adoptive party statement
Agent/employee admission
In order to make an ADOPTIVE party statement (words or conduct) the opposing party must… What…?
Have heard the statement
Understood the statement
A reasonable person under the circumstances would have taken exception
If all of this is true then the party is considered to have adopted that statement as if they had made it themselves.
For an employer/agent to make a statement or admission on your behalf what must be proved?
Statement made in the scope of employment
Made while the employee was employed by the company
Employee does NOT need authority to speak on behalf of the company. But there must be evidence of the employment relationship.
Does an opposing party statement need to be against the parties interests at the time it was made in order for it to be admissible as a hearsay exclusion?
No
Is personal knowledge required to use an opposing party statement?
No
For a statement to be a prior inconsistent statement, what are the requirements?
The contradictory statement or omission must be:
– under oath
– in another proceeding
If a prior inconsistent statement is admissible under the hearsay exclusion in what circumstances can it be used in evidence?
Provided the statement is made under oath in another proceeding, it can be used both as substantive evidence and to impeach.
To introduce a prior CONSISTENT statement what kind of triggering event are you looking for to rely on this hearsay exclusion? There are two ways to introduce the prior consistent statement.
- A) A charge of recent fabrication,
- B) The Prior Consistent Statement can then be offered to rebut the charge that the witness is lying
- C) Provided that the statement being offered was made before any motive to lie arose.
OR
2) To rehabilitate a witness impeached on some other ground.
— But remember that it cannot be used to rehabilitate where the witnesses’s character for truthfulness has been impeached.