Hearsay Flashcards
Hearsay Definition
Out of court statement by a person
offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted
Hearsay Rule
Hearsay is inadmissible unless an exception applies.
Purposes BESIDES truth of the matter
- Verbal Act (legally operative words)
- To show effect on person who heard statement (prior notice or to show person’s motive, fear, etc.)
- Circumstantial evidence of Speaker’s State of Mind
Witness’s Prior Statements that are NOT hearsay
3 kinds
- Witness’s prior statement of identification of a person
- Witness’s prior INconsistent statement IF oral, under oath, during formal trial, hearing, proceeding, or deposition.
- Witness’s prior CONSISTENT statement from BEFORE improper motive/influence arose IF used to rebut charge of recent fabrication/improper motive.
Statement of a Party-Opponent (party admission)
Any statement made by a party, offered AGAINST that party, is NOT HEARSAY, and is therefore admissible unless otherwise precluded.
Adoption - if party expressly or impliedly adopts stmt of another, still not hearsay and admissible. ADOPTION BY SILENCE if 1) hears and understands statement and 2) remains silent under circumstances in which a reasonable person would protest if the statement were false.
Vicarious Party Admission as statement of a party-opponent
Statement by an agent/employee is admissible against principal if stmt 1) concerns a matter within scope of agency/employment and 2) is made during the existence of the agency/employment relationship.
Co-Conspirator’s Statement as statement of party-opponent
Statement of a co-conspirator is admissible against a party who was a member of the conspiracy if made 1) during and 2) in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Hearsay Exceptions
- Forefeiture by wrongdoing
- Former Testimony
- Statement against Interest
- Dying Declaration
- Excited Utterance
- Present Sense Impression
- Present State of Mind
- Declaration of Intent
- Present Physical Condition
- Statement for Purpose of Medical Treatment/diagnosis
- Business Records
- Public Records
- Past Recollection Recorded
- Learned Treatises
Hearsay Exceptions that Require Declarant to be UNAVAILABLE to apply (4)
- Forefeiture By Wrongdoing
- Former Testimony
- Statement Against Interest
- Dying Declaration
Grounds for Unavailability
- Privilege
- unable to be located with due diligence
- witness beyond the court’s subpoena power
- illness or death
- lack of memory
- stubborn refusal to testify
6th Amendment Confrontation Clause and Hearsay
The prosecution may not use hearsay stmt against the criminal defendant (even if it falls w/in hrsy exception) if
- the statement is TESTIMONIAL
- the declarant is UNAVAILABLE and
- the defendant has had NO OPPORTUNITY to cross-examine
Testimonial
It IS Testimonial if
- grand jury testimony
- response to police questioning if the primary purpose is to establish or prove past events that are potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
- Sworn Affidavits
- Forensic lab report IF primary purpose is to accuse a targeted individual
NOT testimonial if
1. response to police questioning if the primary purpose is to enable the police to meet an ONGOING EMERGENCY (911 call; crime ended but perpretator armed and at large)
- business records
- Forensic Lab reports IF no particular person is suspected at the time of analysis.
Forensic Evidence - Testimonial?
Yes if for primary purpose of accusing/convicting a targeted individual/suspect.
No if no particular person is suspected at time of analysis.
BUT no confrontation problem if prosecution calls an expert who performed an independent analysis of the data who only generally refers to the report as PART of basis for opinion, and doesn’t read report into evidence.
Forfeiture by Wrongdoing
Hrsy Exception
Any type of hearsay statement is admissible against a defendant whose wrongdoing made the witness unavailable if the court finds
- by a POTE
- that the D’s conduct was designed to prevent the witness from testifying.
Forfeits Hrsy objection AND confrontation clause objection.
Former Testimony
1) Former testimony
2) of a now unavailable witness
3) if given at a former formal judicial proceeding (including deposition)
4) IS admissible against a party who on the prior occasion had an opportunity AND MOTIVE to cross examine or develop the testimony of the witness.
Must be same issue in both proceedings
If former case was civil and now criminal, probably NOT similar enough motive for D.