Hearsay Flashcards
802
Hearsay is not admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise:
A federal statute;
These rules; or
Other rules, prescribed by the Supreme Court.
801(a)
(a) “Statement” means: A person’s oral assertion, Written assertion, or Nonverbal conduct, If the person intended it as an assertion.
801(b)
(b) “Declarant” means the person who made the statement.
801(c)
(c) “Hearsay” means a statement that:
(1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and
(2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement.
801(d)(1)
(d) A statement that meets the following conditions is not hearsay:
(1) A declarant-witness’s prior statement.
The declarant testifies and
Is subject to cross-examination about a prior statement,
And the statement:
(A) is inconsistent with the declarant’s testimony and was given under penalty of perjury at a trial hearing, or other proceeding or in a deposition.
(B) is consistent with the declarant’s testimony and is offered:
i. to rebut an express or implied charge that the declarant recently fabricated it or acted from a recent improper influence or motive in testifying; or
ii. to rehabilitate the declarant’s credibility as a witness when attacked on another ground.
© identifies a person as someone the declarant perceived earlier.
801(d)(2)
(2) An opposing party’s statement. The statement is offered against an opposing party and:
(A) was made by the party in an individual or representative capacity;
(B) is one the party manifested that it adopted or believed to be true.
© was made by a person whom the the party authorized to make a statement on the subject;
(D) was made by the party’s agent or employee on a matter within the scope of that relationship while it existed;
(E) was made by the party’s coconspirator during and in furtherance of the conspiracy.
804(a)
(a) A declarant is considered to be unavailable as a witness if the declarant:
(1) is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because the court rules that a privilege applies;
(2) refuses to testify about the subject matter despite a court order to do so;
(3) testifies to not remembering the subject matter;
(4) cannot be present or testify at the trial or hearing because of death or then-existing infirmity, physical illness, or mental illness; or
(5) is absent from the trial or hearing and the statement’s proponent has not been able, by process or other reasonable means, to procure:
(A) the declarant’s attendance, in the case of a hearsay exception under 804(b)(1)/(6); or
(B) the declarant’s attendance or testimony, in the case of a hearsay exception under 804(b)(2)/(3)/(4).
But this subdivision (a) does not apply if the statement’s proponent procured or wrongfully caused the declarant’s unavailability as a witness in order to prevent the declarant from attending or testifying.
804(b)(1)
(b) The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay if the declarant is unavailable as a witness:
(1) Former Testimony. Testimony that:
(A) was given as a witness at a trial, hearing, or lawful deposition, whether given during the current proceeding or a different one; and
(B) is now offered against a party who had, or, in a civil case, whose predecessor in interest had, an opportunity, and similar motive to develop it by direct, cross, or redirect.
804(b)(2)
(2) Statement under the belief of imminent death. In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil case, a statement that the declarant, while believing the declarant’s death to be imminent, made about its cause or circumstances.
804(b)(3)
(3) Statement against interest. A statement that:
(A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it
Was so contrary to the declarant’s proprietary or pecuniary interest or
Had so great a tendency to invalidate the declarant’s claim against someone else or
To expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability; and
(B) is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its trustworthiness, if it is offered in a criminal case as one that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability.
804(b)(6)
(6)Statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused the declarant’s unavailability (Forfeiture). A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused, or acquiesced in wrongfully cause, the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.
803(1)
The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness:
(1) Present Sense Impression. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it.
803(2)
(2) Excited Utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that it caused.
803(3)
(3) Then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition. A statement of the declarant’s then-existing:
State of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or
Emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health),
But not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarant’s will.
803(4)
(4) Statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment. A statement that:
(A) is made for, and is reasonably pertinent to, medical diagnosis or treatment, and
(B) describes
Medical history;
Past or present symptoms or sensations;
Their inception; or their general cause.