Health and Disease in Society Flashcards
Preventable?
An adverse event that could be prevented given the current state of medical knowledge
Clinical governance?
A framework through which NHS organisations are held accountable by continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will flourish
- all doctors work under this duty
Examples of preventable events:
- operations performed on the wrong part of the body
- retained objects
- wrong dose/type of medication given
- failure to rescue
- some kind of infections
The swiss cheese model/james reasons framework of error?
consists of active failure and latent failure both of which lead to the occurrence of preventable events
Active failures?
are acts that lead directly to the patient being harmed e.g. baby has a seizure as a result of a drug overdose
Latent failures?
= accidents waiting to happen
- any aspect of context that means active failures are more likely to occue such as poor training, poor supervision, poor design of syringes, too few staff
Why patient safety problems occur?
- poorly designed systems that do not take into account human factors
- culture and behaviour
- over reliance of individual responsibility
- either system or individual (careless/incompetent) can be at fault
- human factors
How can we avoid the effects of human factors?
- avoid reliance on memory
- make things visible
- review and simplify processes
- standardise common procedures and processes
- decrease the reliance on vigilance
Ensuring quality was done in the health and social care act in 2010…
- need continuous improvement in the quality of services provided to individuals
- effectiveness of services
- safety of services
- quality of the experience undergone by patients
What are the NHS quality improvement mechanisms?
- standard setting: done by NICE aim to define what high quality care should look like
- Commissioning: by CCGs, commission services for local population
- Financial incentives: QOF, CQUIN (quality and outcomes framework, commissioning for quality and innovation)
- Disclosure: of evidence about performance on an organisational and trust level, focus on safety, effectiveness and experience of patients
- regulation, registration and inspection: care quality commission registers and licenses providers of care services, monitors services to ensure that they meet the standard, can also make unannounced visits, can issue warning notices, fines, prosecution, restriction on activities and closure
- data gathering and feedback
- clinical audit (local and national/ professional regulation)
Define the audit cycle
Choose topic -> criteria and standards (using research evidence) -> first evaluation -> implement change -> second evaluation -> etc
Clinical audit:
a quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic review of care against criteria and change
Definition of evidence based medicine:
- involves the integration of individual clinical practice with its best available external clinical evidence from systematic reviews
Origins of evidence based healthcare…
The argument that….
- health service delivery should be based on the best available evidence
- bets evidence os findings of rigorously conducted research
- look at evidence of effectiveness (drugs practices, interventions) and cost effectiveness (in a system with finite resources)
Why do we need systematic reviews?
- traditional narrative literature may be biased and subjective
- not easy to see ho studies were identified for review
- quality of studies reviewed variable and sometimes poor
- used to help address clinical uncertainty
- can highlight gaps in research/poor quality research
Why are systematic reviews useful to clinicians?
- by appraising and integrating findings they offer quality control and increased certainty
- offer authoritative, generalisable and up to date conclusions
- save clinicians form having to locate and appraise the studies for themselves
- may reduce delay between research discoveries and implementation
What are practical criticisms of evidence based medicine?
- impossible task to create and maintain systematic reviews across all specialities
- challenging and expensive to disseminate and implement findings
- methodological arguments about meta analyses and systematic reviews
- RCTs not always feasible/necessary/desirable (due to ethical considerations)
- choice of outcomes are often very biomedical
- some groups may not be well served such as minority ethnic groups
What are the philosophical critiques of the evidence based practice movement?
- does not align with most doctors mode of reasoning
- aggregate, population level outcomes don’t mean that it will work for the individual
- potential of EBN to create unreflective rule followers out of professionals and possible more work for explaining why they have not followed guidelines
- might be understood as a means of legitimising rationing
- doctors may lose their autonomy and could become more like accountants than doctors
What are the difficulties in getting evidence into practice?
- evidence exists but doctors do not know about it?
- doctors know about the evidence but do not sue it due to habit
- organisational systems cannot support innovation
- commissioning decision reflects different priorities i.e. what if patients want something else
- resources not avaliable to implement the change
What are complementary therapies?
The practice of complementary therapies or alternative medicine involves and medical system based in a theory of disease or method treatment other than the orthodox method of science as taught in medical schools
examples of complementary therapies?
- osteopathy, chiropractor, acupuncture, indian head massage, hypnotherapy, bach flower remedy
Why do people use complementary therapies?
- if they have persistent symptoms that have not been relieved with conventional treatment
- real or perceived adverse effects of conventional treatment
- may feel they receive more time and attention (paying!)
- have a preference for a more holistic approach to the problem
What is the doctors perspective on complementary therapies?
- believe some established forms maybe of benefit
But concerns include: - practitioners maybe unqualified and unregulated
- may risk missed or delayed diagnosis as could go to complementary therapies first
- may refuse conventional treatment
- may waste money on ineffective treatment
- the mechanism of some complementary treatments is so implausible it cannot work
What is the evidence base idea for complimentary therapies?
- should meet the same standards of any other treatment
- issues in assessing the effectiveness in ways consistent with EBM principles
- is EBM relevant and applicable to complementary therapies
- should be judged by biomedical rules
What are the challenges in conducting trials?
- resources
- trial of single intervention may not reflect reality due to co morbities
- multifaceted intervention trial is very complex
- have to agreement for randomisation
- finding placebos and shams can be challenging especially in complementary therapies
- difficult to make double blind
What are the argument for NICE evaluating complementary therapies?
- high public interest
- half GP provide access
- address inequalities in access/opportunity
- should apply same standards to everything
- stimulate more high quality reserach
Arguments against NICE evaluating complementary therapies?
- money is limited in NHS
- NHS has higher priorities
- poor quality evidence in these ares i.e. small number, poorly powered studies, poor methodology
What is the traditional model of professional self regulation?
- 1858 medical act gave power to the GMC over registration of doctors
- it was seen that the interests of the profession would be the best guarantee of the interests of the public
- heavily dependant upon professional norms
- relies on individuals internalising and cooperating with the collective norms of the professional group and aligning their conduct with the professions standards
What is a profession?
is a type of occupation able to make distinct claims about its works practices and status.
What is professionalisation?
Describes the social and historical process that result in an occupation becoming a profession
How does an occupation become a profession?
- asserting exclusive claim over a body of knowledge or expertise
- establishing control over market competitors
- establishing control over professional work practices
What is professional socialisation?
the process through which new entrants acquire the professional identities/turning lay persons into professionals by..
formal curriculum: knowledge tested through exams and acquisition of technical knowledge
informal curriculum: attitudes and beliefs that are performance noted but are not formally examined
What are the critisms of self regulation?
- an attempt to collect monopoly rents
- claims of virtue as self deceiving vision of the objectivity and reliability of its members
- bad apples e.g. bristol inquiry, Harold shipman
- common theory in reports of those in positions of authority in the NHS, its regulators, failure to detect signs of unacceptable or incompetent professional behaviour and to take effective and timely action action to protect patients for example staff who were informed found it difficult to act, patients who were told health professional often greeted with disbelief or discredited, whistle blowers are not always believed, NHS disciplinary procedures are cumbersome, costly and inhibiting
What are the rules of professional propriety?
- doctors discouraged from raising concerns about each other
- etiquette rules forbid close monitoring of other doctors
- hist costs associated with sanctioning
- problems of quality of evidence, absence of supportive process
- credibility gap
- shared sense of personal vulnerability
What was the end of self regulation and the regulatory reform
- GMC was given parity of lay and professional members
- there was a move away from the self regulatory model, this was overseen by the professional standards authority for health and social care
- the powers of setting standards, monitoring practice and conduct and management relocated from inside the profession
Fitness to practice questions?
- if concerned then referred to medical tribunals service
reasons include - misconduct, poor performance, criminal conviction or caution, physical/mental illness, failure to listen to concerns
What actions can be taken by the GMC?
- agree undertaking with the doctor
- place conditions on their registration
- suspend their registration
- remove them from the medical register
What is revalidation?
a local evaluation of a doctors practice through annual appraisals that consider the whole of their practice.
- participate in annual appraisal that have a GMP at their core
- maintain a portfolio of supporting information to bring their appraisals as a basis for discussion
- have a positive recommendation from a responsible officer
What is the rise of mangerialism?
- gone from administrations (facilitating the work of professionals) to management (control over the work of professionals)
- now appoint consultants, allocate clinical excellence awards, agree detailed job descriptions, assist in implementation of government policies, expect to ensure compliance with guidelines and clinical governance
What are the two forms of rationing?
Explicit rationing = care is limited but is based on defined rules of entitlement i.e. the reasoning behind decisions is explicit
Implicit rationing = is the allocation of resources though individual clinical decisions but the decisions, nor the bases of these decisions is clearly expressed
When was implicit rationing used?
- before 1990 reforms of NHS
- patients believes that care with offered or withheld on the basis of clinical need
- however this was open to abuse, could lead to inequalities and discrimination, decisions based on social deservingness, doctor appeared increasingly unwilling to do it
In explicit rationing there are..
- technical processes e.g. assessments of efficiency and equity
- political processes e.g. lay participation
What are the advantages to explicit rationing?
- transparent and accountable
- opportunity for debate
- uses EBM
- more opportunities for equity in decision making
What are the disadvantages to explicit rationing?
- very complex
- heterogeneity of patients and illnesses
- patient and professional hostility
- threat to clinical freedom
- evidence of patient distress
Technical efficiency?
- you are interested in the most efficient way of meeting a need
Allocative efficiency?
- you are choosing between the many needs to be met
What are the range of opportunities to resource allocation in healthcare?
- NICE: gives guidelines, directions are binding, replaces local recommendations, has to approve significant new drugs and devices, has a controversial role in expensive treatment,
- Tariffs: payments by results, diagnosis treatment etc are recorded and coded so if efficient enough then a tariff is paid hence trusts can make money or if never events occur then no payment is made to the hospital
- could let the public decide
What are the issues in letting the public decide in resource allocation?
- consultation can be problematic
- resistant to rationing
- majority think that everyone should have the healthcare they need regardless of cost
- tend to value heroic interventions higher and particular patient groups too
- have a preference for treating patients with dependants
- a willingness to discriminate against those who were partially responsible for their health e.g. smokers
What is opportunity cost?
- this is the idea that choosing to use resources in one way forgoes the opportunity to use them in other ways, this is measured in terms of benefits foregone
What is economic evaluation?
is the comparison of resource implications and benefits of alternative ways of delivering healthcare
- can facilitate decisions so that they are more transparent and fair
- is underpinned by the concepts of scarcity/sacrifice, efficiency, utility and opportunity costs
- is a system in which competing programmes are evaluated in terms of their cost and consequence
What are costs in economical evaluation?
- medical e.g. treatment, health professional visits
- non medical e.g. time off work, travel costs
What are the benefits in economic evaluation?
- survival
- monetary
- clinical criteria
- quality of life
What is cost minimisation analysis?
This is were outcomes are assumed to be equivalent and are compared on their inputs i.e. cost
- this is not relevant as it is rare that outcome are equivalent
What is cost-effective analysis?
this is used to compare drugs or interventions which a have a common health outcome such as lowering blood pressure. The interventions are compared in terms of cost per unit outcome such as a 5mmHg drop in BP.
But if costs are higher in one treatment but benefits are too then need to calculate how much extra benefit do you get for the extra cost?
- uses a cost effectiveness plane
What is cost benefit analysis?
This is were all inputs and outputs are compared in monetary terms and hence allows comparisons for interventions outside of healthcare but methodological issues include putting value on non-monetary benefits such as lives saved.
willingness to pay is problematic here e.g. how much is a life worth?
What is cost utility analysis (the one we use!)
is a particular type of cost effectiveness analysis that focuses on the quality of health outcomes produced or foregone
- most frequently used measure if quality adjusted life years, QALYs (which is a composite of survival and quality of life) where interventions are compared in cost per QALY
What are problems with QALYs?
RCT evidence: - comparison therapies may differ - length of follow up - atypical care - atypical patients - limited generalisability - sample sizes however statical modelling can address some of these problems and areas of uncertainty
What are the criticisms of QALYs?
- do not distribute resources according to need but according to benefits gained per unit of cost
- technical problems with calculations
- may not embrace all dimensions of benefits
- controversy about the values that they embody
What are the advantages to QALYs?
- effective measure that can be used in a wide range of settings
- allows broad comparisons across differing programmes
What are the founding principles of the NHS?
- universal (covering everyone)
- comprehensive (covering all health needs)
- free at the point of delivery
Now there is continual change due to pressures such as ageing population, shifting burden of disease, new technologies, increasing expectations, financial austerity
At the top of the NHS….
- secretary of state for health = overall accountability for NHS
- department of health = sets national standards, shapes direction of NHS and social care services
- NHS England = authorises clinical commissioning groups, supports, develops and performance manages commissioning, comssion general primary care services
- CCGs = crucial bodies in new organisation of the NHS that bring together GPs, nurse, specialists, public health, patient, public and other to commission secondary and community healthcare services, 65% of NHS budget, local authorities now responsible for public health
Service provision..
CCGs and NHS England commission providers to provide care for populations that they serve. Can put contracts with private or volunatry sectors
NHS providers of care…
e.g. acute hospital trusts, community health services trust, ambulance service trust, GP practices
Earn money through reaching targets and if can earn money via greater function and managerial activity if gain foundation trust status
Can also earn money through undergraduate and postgraduate teaching
What are the management skills needed by doctors?
Strategic: ability to analyse, plan, make decisions
Financial: ability to set priorities and manage a budget
Operational: ability to run things, execute plans
Human resources: ability to manage people and teams
What are the management roles for doctors?
- medical director, clinical director, consultant, GP
What is the clinical directors role?
To manage his or her directorate as a whole e.g. radiology, cardiology
- provide continuing medical education and training
- design and implement policies on junior doctors hours of work, supervision, tasks and responsibilities
- ensure that clinical audit is carried out and results are translated into improvements
- develop management guidelines and protocols for clinical procedures
- induction of new doctors
What is the medical directors role?
- responsible for the quality of medical care i.e. care provided by doctors at hospital
- communicates between the board and medical staff
- leadership of medical staff: sets out strategy, exemplifies positive values, helps to implement change
- leads on organisations clinical policy and clinical standards
- associate or deputy medical directors may have responsibility for particular functions such as patient safety and clinical governance