Head 21: Landownership Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is landownership law concerned with?

A

If you own a piece of property, what are the limits of your ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you determine the boundaries of land?

A

This differs between the two registers.

1) For Land Register land, position as disclosed on title sheet (ordnance map) and verbal description (in the case of flats).
⁃ Nb since this isn’t to scale it may not be exact - there may be tolerances.

2) For Sasine registered land, either titles contain a bounding description[ This marks out the boundaries of the land, either by means of a verbal description or a plan or both.] or they do not, in which case boundaries depend on prescriptive possession (I.e. Where there has been possession for ten years which is open, peaceable and without judicial interruption, a title to the land as possessed will be established by positive prescription subject to the deed containing the description being valid.
- It can use measurements, pictorial representation or both.
- If there is an irreconcilable conflict between these methods there are rules for resolving I.e. The plan will prevail if it is declared to be ‘taxative’. It is also possible to have a boundary description by reference to an earlier recorded deed containing such a descriptionn. This means that there is no need to have a long verbal description or prepare a fresh plan every time the land is transferred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is ownership coelo usque ad centrum?

A

In both cases ownership is a coelo usque ad centrum [From the heaven to the centre of the earth.], subject to separate tenements (for which see below).
⁃ This means you can (in theory) build up or down as far as you want; this is, of course, subject to planning permission. But it does mean you own anything underneath the soil. But what happens if e.g. planes fly over your house - NO, there is a special statutory rule that aircraft can fly over your property and this is not trespass if the flight is at a reasonable height [Civil Aviation Act 1982, s 76].
⁃ Also this rule isn’t completely accurate in relation to separate tenements (see below)
- Above the ground it includes airspace, to a ceiling of 100km and anything that has acceded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are pertinents?

A

Ownership of a piece of land carries with it ownership of the ‘parts and pertinent’. These are things which are transferred to the new owner automatically, without the need for express provision. Nonetheless, it is standard in the disposition of land in the Sasine register to have a clause conveying parts and pertinent. This is usually omitted in the Land Register.

A pertinent is subsidiary heritable property beyond the boundaries of your property that you get when you own a piece of property (it is nonetheless part of your property).
⁃ e.g. A garage, car parking space, bin store, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does something become a pertinent?

A

Either the title deeds can say or it can occur by prescription (i.e. if there isn’t a clear express grant you can establish ownership of the pertinent by use - not very easy because you can’t prescribe beyond a boundary description so if it clear that the area of land falls outwith the boundary description then positive prescription is not possible).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What do pertinents divide into?

A

Pertinents divide into:

(1) Corporeal pertinents, subdividing into:
⁃ (a) Additional piece of land.
⁃ Must be used in association with the principal land. In practice requires to be fortified by (1) positive prescription [ In the land register, prescription beyond the boundaries on the map is clearly not possible. ]in the case of Sasine Register on the basis of a herbal title or where not the subject of a clear (2) express grant. It then appears on the title sheet. Cooper’s Trs v Stark’s Trs (1898) 25 R 1160.
- e.g. Garages and parking spaces serving a house or flat.

⁃ (b) Rights of common property.
⁃ This is in particular a feature of tenemental property - in tenements you own the flat and also have rights in common property (e.g. the close or stair). These rights of common property attach to the flat as pertinents.
⁃ In practice these are created either by express grant in original break-off conveyance or by Tenements (Scotland) Act 2004 s 3.
⁃ NB in the case of PMP Plus Ltd v Keeper of the Registers of Scotland 2009[ “a pro indiviso share with all the proprietors of all other dwellinghouses and flatted dwellinghouses erected or to be erected on the development…in and to those parts of the development which on completion thereof shall not have been exclusively alienated to purchasers of dwellinghouses or flatted dwellinghouses, which said parts comprise or shall comprise inter alia… other areas of open space”.] it was held that a description based upon an uncertain future event was not sufficient to describe the property clearly enough.

(2) Incorporeal pertinents
⁃ (c) Title conditions.
⁃ These are also pertinents (the right to enforce a title condition is a pertinent). i.e. the right to enforce a servitude or a real burden against the owner of the adjacent land is a right attached to ownership of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the doctrine of separate tenements?

A

The doctrine of separate tenements is the exception to the rule that ownership of land is from he heavens to the centre of the earth.

Ownership a coelo usque ad centrum is subject to separate tenements - these are heritable property owned separately from the solum (soil) and is capable of separate ownership.

NB this has a different meaning to ‘tenement’ in the sense of a block of flats. A separate tenement is transferred in tis own right. There are two types of separate tenement: (1) conventional and (2) legal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can you Distinguish conventional STS from legal STS?

A

1) Convention STS: Things which would not normally be separate but the parties have actively made separate tenements.
2) Legal STS: Created by operation of law (they are implied).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are convention separate tenements?

A

Where a section of land is separated from the remainder by express conveyance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How are convention separate tenements created?

A

Created in a disposition (or feu disposition[ Prior to 28 November 2004.]) either by grant or by reservation.

⁃ Below ground available without restriction, eg minerals[ If you convey the minerals then the person gets the space that the minerals occupied after mining takes place.].
⁃ Above ground not generally allowed[ This means you cannot convey trees - the person who owns the land always owns the trees.].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Crichton v Turnbull 1946

A

Held that pipes lying on the ground can’t be owned separately from the ownership of the ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Compugraphics International Ltd v Nikolic 2011

A

Overhanging cable blocks couldn’t be held separately from the ownership of the land.

But they must be corporeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the exception with regards to airspace?

A

The position with regards to brides and unoccupied airspace is unclear

But there is one exception: in relation to flatted property, if you own a flat above the ground floor you just own the airspace.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the other exception with regards to sporting rights?

A

But exception for the 65 cases of sporting rights converted from feudal reservations by a notice registered under s 65A of the 2000 Act. These are restricted to rights of fishing and game. The separate tenement created here is curious as it can be non-exclusive, e.g. The right to fish can be shared with the owner of the principal land which is contrary to the usual notion of separate tenements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are legal separate tenements?

A

Legal separate tenements arise by operation of law and are therefore always separately owned.
⁃ Impliedly reserved from Crown grants. But, as regalia minora, could be expressly granted either to owner of solum or (more usually) to someone else. Insofar as not granted they still belong to the Crown[ I.e. they are reserved to the Crown, but the Crown can grant them to others.]. These cane corporeal or incorporeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the main legal separate tenements?

A

The main legal separate tenements are as follows:
⁃ (a) Right to fish for salmon. Although incorporeal it is treated in the same way as a physical stratum of earth, ie not as a right in land but as land itself.
⁃ (b) Right to gather mussels.
⁃ (c) Right to gather oysters.
⁃ (d) Mines of gold and silver
⁃ Regulated by the Royal Mines Act 1424. But landowners are entitled to a Crown grant on request: Mines and Metals Act 1592 [the effect of this Act is that landowners who find a gold or silver mine can ask the Crown for a grant of the mines within their land but in return you must give the Crown 1/10 of the value of the metal mined.
⁃ (e) Petroleum and natural gas: Petroleum Act 1998 sched 3, para 3 - reserved to the Crown under this Act.
⁃ (f) Coal. Belongs to the Coal Authority and not the Crown. See Coal Industry Act 1994 s 7(3). [So this is not a regalia minora since it belongs to the coal authority.]

⁃ NB there is a general rule that no accession is possible across the boundaries of separate tenements.

17
Q

What is the ‘right of exclusive use’?

A

Erskine II.1.1 defines ownership as “the right of using and disposing of a subject as our own, except insofar as we are restrained by law or paction”.

In practice most important right of use is right to possession. And owner can:
⁃ (1) defend possession if challenged (whether by encroachment (Head 23) or trespass (Head 25)) and
⁃ (2) recover possession if lost.

18
Q

How may possession of land be recovered?

A

Possession may be recovered from any person occupying land unlawfully. Where the possession has never been lawful the appropriate action is an action of ejection. But where the possession was formerly lawful but the title of the possessor has now terminated - the standard example is a tenant who has come to the end of his lease - the appropriate action is an action of removing.

Note that where the action is raised in the sheriff court under the summary cause rules, the appropriate action is an action for the recovery of possession of heritable property and the distinction between ejection and removing is not made.

The equivalent act for recovery of possession of corporeal moveables is delivery (restitution).

19
Q

Who has title to sue?

A

Possession of land may be protected/recovered by the owner of land or, where it is tenanted by the tenant.

How does a pursuer prove title? The rules are complex, but in summary they are these.
⁃ (1) Where the defender avers an independent and competing title, pursuer must prove that he owns the land (or, as the case may be, is the tenant). Proof of ownership was considered in Head 10.
⁃ (2) Where the defender does not aver an independent and competing title, the pursuer need show only a prima facie title (eg a recorded disposition in his favour), and evidence of possession is not required.

20
Q

What are the restraints on the use of land?

A

(1) By neighbour law. See Head 23.

(2) By statute
⁃ Control of Pollution Act 1974
⁃ Preventing pollution of the land of others.
⁃ Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997
⁃ You generally need planning permission to erect buildings.

(3) By "special regimes"
⁃	A special package of mutual rights and obligations through the mechanism of statute or common interest (usually arise where people are living in close proximity). Main examples are: 
⁃	flatted buildings
⁃	mutual walls and fences
⁃	rivers and lochs
⁃	See further Heads 20, 23 and 24.

(4) By agreement
⁃ real rights (e.g. lease where the landlord loses the right to use the property for the period of the lease.)
⁃ personal rights (e.g. you could agree that someone can park their car on your driveway for as long as you don’t say otherwise)