Harm to Economic/Dignitary Interests Flashcards

1
Q

DEFAMATION

A

1) D must make a defamatory statement
- Not mere name-calling
- Person must be alive
(2) Of or concerning the P
- Does not have to be explicitly ID’ed
2) Publication of that statement
- One person is sufficient
- Intentional publication NOT required - can be negligent
3) Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO DEFAMATION

A

1) Consent
2) Truth
- D has burden of proof
3) Privilege

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ABSOLUTE PRIVILEGES

A
  • Flows from identity of speaker
  • Can never be lost

1) Communication between spouses
2) Government officers in the conduct of official activities
- Includes lawyers, witnesses, etc.
3) Members of the media when engaged in accurate reporting of public proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

QUALIFIED PRIVILEGES

A

Flows from context where in the public interest to encourage honesty and candor

  • Recognized when the recipient has an interest in the info and it is reasonable for D to make publication
    • i.e. letters of recommendation, giving references, statements made to police

1) Statement made in good faith
2) Confined to matters topically relevant to the privilege

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CONSTITUTIONAL DEFAMATION

A

2 additional elements where defamation involves a matter of PUBLIC CONCERN:

1) Falsity
2) Fault/Culpability (i.e. MALICE)
- If P is a PUBLIC figure: prove intent/recklessness (i.e. knew falsity, or reckless disregard for truth)
- If P is a PRIVATE figure: negligence is sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SLANDER PER SE

A

Damages are PRESUMED

4 types of statements:

1) Related to P’s business or profession
2) P committed a crime of moral turpitude
3) Imputing un-chastity to a woman
4) P suffers from a loathsome disease (leprosy or VD)

NY: 5) Imputation of homosexuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PRESUMED DAMAGES

A
  • All instances of Libel
  • Slander per se

IN NY:
Proof of damages required if libel is not defamatory on its face and does not fall in a per se category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

APPROPRIATION

A

D makes unauthorized use of P’s name or image for a commercial advantage

**ONLY privacy tort recognized in NY by statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

INTRUSION

A

Invasion of P’s seclusion in a way that will be highly offensive to an average person
-MUST be in a location where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FALSE LIGHT

A
  • Widespread dissemination of a major falsehood about an average person
  • Need not be defamatory to be actionable (i.e. mischaracterizing one’s beliefs)
  • Can recover emotional and social damages

DEFENSE: Privilege

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DISCLOSURE

A

Widespread dissemination of confidential info about P that would be highly offensive to an average person

  • Info is true, but intimate (i.e. tax return, medical record)
  • Newsworthiness exception may relax liability - public desire to know
  • Dual spheres of life (i.e. out of the closet but not at work)

DEFENSE: Privilege

-IN NY: Can bring claim for breach of fiduciary duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ARE OPINIONS DEFAMATORY?

A

Only if they appear to be based on specific facts, and an express allegation of those facts would be defamatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

GROUP DEFAMATION

A
  • If defamatory statements refers to ALL members of a SMALL group, each member may establish that the statement is “of and concerning” him by alleging that he is a group member
  • If it is a LARGE group, NO member can prove that the statement is “of and concerning” him
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

4 PRIVACY TORTS

A

(1) Appropriation of P’s Picture or Name
(2) Intrusion P’s Affairs or Seclusion
(3) Publication of Facts Placing P In “False Light”
(4) Public Disclosure of Private Facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION/FRAUD

A

ELEMENTS

(1) Misrepresentation of a material fact
- Usually silence not enough
(2) Scienter
- Intent/knowledge of falsity
(3) Intent to Induce Reliance
(4) Causation (actual reliance)
(5) Justifiable Reliance
(6) Damages (actual pecuniary loss)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS RELATIONS

A

(1) Existence of a valid K relationship between P and a third party
(2) D’s knowledge of the relationship/K
(3) Intentional interference by D inducing a breach or termination of relationship/K
(4) Damages (actual breach/termination)
(5) Absence of a privilege

17
Q

PRIVILEGE AS A DEFENSE TO INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS RELATIONS

A

D’s conduct may be privileged where it is a proper attempt to obtain business for itself or protect its interests

e. g.
- Interference with prospective business rather than existing K’s
- Commercial acceptable means of persuasion instead of illegal or threatening tactics
- Competitor of P seeking the same customers
- Financial interest in or responsibility for the third party (like advisory relationship)

18
Q

MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

A

D institutes a criminal or civil proceeding against P without probable cause
-Case is terminated favorably to the P and brought by an improper purpose

19
Q

THEFT OF TRADE SECRETS

A

NYS tort

(1) Valid trade secret
- info providing a biz advantage
- info not generally known
(2) Taking of that secret by improper means
- traitorous insider or industrious spy