Handouts Flashcards

1
Q

a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the person of stopped of criminal activity.

A

Reasonable suspicion:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

to share as existing where the known facts and circumstances are sufficient to warrant a man of reasonable prudence in the belief that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.”

A

Probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

determines when to grant a warrant based on informant’s information

A

Totality of the Circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

look around the premises with reasonable suspicion, not even probable cause.

A

Protective sweep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the individual wants his case to be reviewed.

A

Writ of habeas corpus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the automobile exception to the warrant clause. If you have probable cause and it is a fleeting object, you may conduct a search. “the Fourth Amendment onward, the court held that automobiles and other conveyances may be searched without a warrant in circumstances that would justify the search without a warrant of a house or an office, provided that there is probable cause to believe that the car contains articles that the officers are entitled to seize.”

A

Caroll Doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

in general it can include any item that needs to be obtained quickly before it is no longer available. Evanescent evidence generally refers to physical, tangible objects as opposed to verbal testimony.

A

Evanescent evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

once in a pursuit of a felon you may conduct a warrantless search and seizure.

A

Hot pursuit of a fleeing felon exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Over the years, lower courts have developed an exception to the exigent circumstances rule, the so-called police-created exigency doctrine. Under this doctrine, the police may not rely on the need to prevent destruction of evidence when that exigency was created or manufactured by the conduct of the police. (e.g. U.S. v. Chambers)”

A

Exigency doctrine:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

There is no expectation of privacy in the trash; what ever you expose to third parties on the trash is not protected.

A

Trash doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

areas outside the curtilage of a home (dwelling house and out buildings) are subject to police entry and search. They are held out to the public and unprotected by the Fourth Amendment.

A

open fields doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

if primary evidence is illegally obtained, all secondary evidence that was found as a result of primary evidence must be thrown out.

A

The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

if secondary evidence can be pulled out through as holly independent source, not related to primary or other secondary evidence, it may be used. In this case, the independent source is that they would have “inevitably found” the evidence.

A

Independent Source Doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

exception to a warrant requirement. If the person has reasonable suspicion, the person may be stopped and patted down.

A

A Terry Stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

is a judge-made doctrine that prohibits the introduction at a criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment rights.

A

Exclusionary Rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

can be defined as a governmental intrusion into an area where a person has a reasonable and justifiable expectation of privacy.

A

Search

17
Q

Seizure can be defined as the exercise of control by the government over a person or a thing.

A

Seizure

18
Q

Under the Modern Approach, [Illinois V. Gates (1983)], a warrant based on an informant’s tip should be issued when probable cause is established under the “Totality of the Circumstances” and the relevant factors to be taken into account are:

A

a) credible information
b) reliable informant
c) police corroboration
d) declaration against interest