Handout 4: Price Levels and Exchange Rates in the Long-Run Flashcards
The Law of One Price (LOOP)
In competitive markets free of transportation costs and official barriers to trade (such as tariffs), identical goods must sell for the same price in different countries, when prices are expressed in a common currency:
Pi = ePi* where Pi (Pi*) is the domestic (foreign) price of good i in domestic (foreign) currency and e is the nominal exchange rate (domestic currency per unit of foreign currency).
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
The exchange rate between two countries’ currencies equals the ratio of the countries’ price levels
It predicts that an increase in the domestic price level will be associated with a proportional depreciation of domestic currency (an increase in e)
Relative PPP
the percentage change in the exchange rate between two currencies over any period equals the difference between the percentage changes in national price levels (inflation rates)
Real Exchange Rate
The real exchange rate between two countries’ currencies is the foreign price of a foreign representative basket, converted to domestic currency, relative to that of the domestic economy:
RER: eP*/P
What does theBalassa - Samuelson Model argue?
They argue that there is a strong correlation between per capita income and price levels between countries. Richer countries tend to have higher price levels.
This is especially true for the price of non-tradeables.
The model shows why this is possible and also explains why PPP can fail even if the Loop holds for tradeable goods.
Engels and Rogers
Failure of One Loop Price (LOOP) has been widely documented: similar goods sold in different locations have different prices, suggesting less than perfect market integration.
Reasons: Geographical separation of markets is an obvious reason (distance proxies for transportation costs, or less similar cost structures). Arbitrage is more difficult.
What are the assumptions in the Balassa Samuelson model?
- 2 countries: Home is the poor country and Foreign is the rich country.
- Two goods tradeable (T) and non-tradeable goods (N).
- Labour is the only factor of production and is perfectly mobile within countries but completely immobile between countries.
Technology: the countries are equally productive in nontradeable (N) but Foreign is more productive in the tradeable sector (T).
Yn=AnLn Yn=AnLn => An=An
Yt=AtLt Y=AtLt At < At
A= Productivity, L= Labour N= Non tradeables T= Tradeables
In the Balassa Samuelson model, what is the profit maximisation condition by firms in all sectors?
Profit maximisation by firms in all sectors implies:
Wn = AnPn and Wt=AtPt
Wn=AnPn and Wt=AtPt
Where W’s are the wage rates in each of the different sectors.
In the Balassa Samuelson Model what does Labour mobility within countries imply?
LABOUR MOBILITY WITHIN COUNTRIES IMPLIES WAGES EQUALISATION BETWEEN SECTORS IN EACH COUNTRY.
Wn=Wt and W*n = W*t => AnPn=AtPt A*nP*n = A*tP*t We get: Pn/Pt = At= An and P*n/P*t=A*t/A*n
What are the findings and conclusions of the Balassa Samuelson model?
In terms of technology (productivity), we assumed that An= A*n and At <a>At) implies higher wages in the whole economy (Wn = Wt) which further implies higher prices in the non tradeable sector. The total price level in the rich countru (composed of both tradeables and non-tradeables is therefore higher than in the poor country
</a>