handling stolen goods Flashcards

1
Q

define handling stolen goods

A

It is important to note that just because you pay a “fair” price for stolen goods, you are not the legal owner of it - the original owner is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

explain Section 22 of the Theft Act 1968

A

-A person handles stolen goods if, while knowing or believing to know, that they are stolen goods, he dishonestly receives the goods, or dishonestly undertakes or assists in their retention, removal
- The stolen good does not have to be received for the receiver to handle/keep, there can be a case whereby a person arranges someone to receive a stolen good and bring it to them.
- Also, if a person believes goods to be stolen and receives it, but it was not in fact stolen, then although they meet mens rea, they do not meet actus reus, and so are not liable. Though, they might be guilty of attempted handling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Actus Reus of Handling Stolen Goods?

A

In order for Actus Reus to be achieved for Handling of Stolen Goods, all 3 elements must be achieve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three elements?

A

-Stolen
- Goods and their Proceeds
-Handling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does “Stolen” mean in this context and what does it include?

A

-“Stolen” is important here because in order for someone to be convicted of “Handling of Stolen Goods”, the goods must first be stolen, then given, or kept.
-Goods obtained through blackmail, fruad, robbery, etc. is considered “stolen”
-Interestingly, the thief may not be convicted of “handling of stolen goods” if he does not keep them, but instead gives them to someone else, who, if they know it was stolen, will be convicted.
-Though if the thief does keep the stolen good, he will be convicted for handling.
-Stolen goods can also include goods stolen outside the UK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give a case example of stolen goods

A

HAUGHTON V SMITH 1975
-the defendant helped dispose a van with stolen corned beef
-however , since the goods had been recovered by the police and were no longer considered stolen, then there no offence in handling stolen goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When do goods cease to be stolen?

A

-When they are returned to their lawful owner -When they are in custody and protection of the police
- When the lawful owner no longer considers the goods to be their property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does “Goods and their proceeds” mean?

A

-This essentially means that the stolen good, even if it is sold, will remain a stolen good, until it ceases to be a stolen good.
-“Proceeds” is referring to, in the event that the good is sold for money or any other form of payment, by the thief or handles who knows the good was originally stolen, the money or other payment received will also be seen as “stolen goods”, since it was sold dishonestly.
-However, if an innocent person were to buy the stolen good, and then sell it, the money or other payment received will not be considered a ‘stolen good’ since they did not sell it dishonestly. However, the stolen good will remain a stolen good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Handling mean in this context and what does it include

A

Handler is the person who is currently in possession or “handling” of the stolen good. Simply using them is not the same as “handling” though. Handling cane be committed in various ways, such as:
-Receiving Stolen goods
-Arranging to receive
-Retention of the goods
-removal of goods
-disposal of goods
-realization of goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does receiving stolen goods mean

A

-Whereby there is possession or control of stolen property
-It does not have to be physical possession, as intangible property such as credit in a bank counts as property.
- However, helping to remove stolen goods from, let’s say, a van, is not enough to amount to receiving, as the element of taking possession or control has not been completed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

give a case example

A

R v Pitchley 1972 whereby defendant was given stolen money to keep, and although he did not know it was stolen initially, when he did know he chose to retain it. Thus, he was convicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is arranging to receive

A

-Whereby an agreement to receive stolen goods has been made
-However, these goods must already have been stolen, and if they are still in early development then they do not yet count

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is retention of goods

A

Whereby defendant, after knowing a good was stolen, chooses to retain the goods, keeping control and possession of them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain the removal of the goods

A

Whereby a person helps carrying or transporting stolen goods for the benefit of someone else, like the thief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain Realization of stolen good

A

Involves selling or exchanging the stolen good for something else of value, like money, to another person(handler, or thief)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain the Disposal of the goods

A

Whereby the defendant transforms the stolen goods, such as changing the identity of stolen good, or melting down stolen metal.

15
Q

What is the Mens Rea of Handling Stolen Goods?

A

In order for Mens Rea to be proved, two elements need to be achieved.

16
Q

Does mere suspicion count as belief?

A

Suspicion in of itself does not amount to knowledge or belief, even if they deliberately try to ignore the possibility of it being a stolen good.

16
Q

What are the two elements?

A

-Knowledge and belief
-Dishonesty

17
Q

What amounts to Knowledge and belief

A

-Whereby the defendant had knowledge that the good was stolen when he received, or was arranging to receive, the good.
-In the case that a defendant did not know a good was stolen at first, but then later knew, and continued to retain or assist in any way in regards to the stolen good, the defendant will be liable
- The defendant does not need to know the contents of the stolen goods, all they need to know is that it is a stolen good; for example, a defendant. does not need to know what is in a bag, but if they know the contents in it are stolen, then that is enough.

18
Q

give a case example

A

R V MOYS 1984
-Whereby a defendant sold a horse after suspecting it was a stolen house, and the court of appeal stated that suspicion does not amount to belief.

19
Q

What is the Sentencing for Handling of Stolen goods

A

-Triable either way offense
-Maximum penalty at crown court is 14 years imprisonment