Hamlet: Acts and scenes Flashcards
Act 1, Scene 1, summary.
Summary: Midnight on the battlements of Elsinore castle, Marcellus, Bernardo and Horatio take over guard from Francisco. The soldiers tell Horatio of the ghost they have seen the two previous nights Horatio thinks it their imagination: “Horatio says ‘tis but our fantasy,” (1,1,23)
The ghost of Old Hamlet (former king of denmark) appears, but stalks away without answering Horatio’s questions. After more conversation between the three men standing guard, the Ghost reappears, Horatio again addresses the Ghost but receives no response (some interpret Horatio provoking the Ghost with his questions) and the Ghost again disappears.
The three men who stand guard decide to tell Hamlet what they have seen.
Act 1, Scene 1, analysis.
- Shakespeare establishes a cold, edgy atmosphere of a night watch immediately through the use of colloquial and fragmented conversation. Something to remember: this would not have been easy for Shakespeare to do, as the first showings of Hamlet were at roughly 2pm on summer afternoons.
- The verse does not flow. Broken rhythms and fragmented sentences generate a mood of unease, apprehension and confusion.
- To emphasise confusion and doubt the play begins with a question: “Who’s there?” In the next twenty lines comes six more questions, reinforcing the motif of confusion and not knowing.
- Some interpret the whole play to be characterized around sickness and disease, so when marcellus says he feels ‘sick at heart’ (line 9) it initiates a stream of imagery of mental and physical illness that will shape the whole play.
Act 1, Scene 2, summary.
- The new king of Denmark, Claudius, adresses the court on his hasty marriage with Gertrude, and on the abrupt death of his brother King Hamlet.
- He deals with young Fortinbras’s threatened invasion with diplomacy.
- He gives Laertes permission to return to France, Laertes is son of Claudius’s chief minister, Polonius.
- Claudius and Gertrude accuse Hamlet of mourning excessively for his fathers death.
- Hamlet is denied permission to return to University in Wittenburg.
- After the court have exited the stage, Hamlet expresses his melancholy and contempt for the King and Queen, their marriage and juxtaposing attitude for his fathers death.
- After Hamlets soliloquy, Horatio, Bernardo and Marcellus enter the stage and tell Hamlet about the ghost they’ve seen up on the battlements the past three nights.
Act 1, Scene 2, analysis.
- Juxtaposing the opening scene, this scene is filled with light, colour, with the whole danish court assembled in the mood of celebration. The dramatic contrast of the two scenes could not be stronger.
- Contrary to our expectations, we learn that young Fortinbras or young Hamlet have succeeded their fathers as king. In both Norway and Denmark, the old king is on the throne. Hamlet tells us later that the Claudius ‘popped in between th’electionand my hopes.’ (act 5, scene 2, line 65)
- The scene opens with a long rhetoric flourish from Claudius in which he seeks to ingratiate himself by creating an impression of confident control, propriety and security.
- Immediately there are false notes: Claudius has not just taken the thrown of old king Hamlet, but also takes his wife Gertrude. Shakespeare’s audience would regard this marriage as incestuous, and because the marriage and funeral were so close together it is inappropriately confused: “with mirth in funeral and with dirge in marriage.” (line 12)
- The king’s confident, carefully balanced antithetical are intended to convey reasonableness: ‘in equal scale weighing delight and dole’ (line 13) But although the fluent movement of the verse tries to carry the listener along with it, the oiliness of the speech is similar to the ‘glib and oily art’ that characterises the insincere gushings of Goneril and and Regan in the opening of ‘King Lear’.
- The court have freely gone along with Claudius, not keeping the memory of old Hamlet. Hamlet is the only one who is wearing mourning.
- Hamlet is offended by Claudius’s complacency, and his anger is much more provoked by Gertrudes behaviour, especially when she accuses him of acting: ‘seems madam? nay it is, I know not seems’ (line 76)
- ‘Common’ is used as wordplay between Hamlet and Gertrude: “Thou know’st ‘tis common, all that lives must die “ (Gertrude line 72) “Ay madam, it is common.” (Hamlet line 74) Gertrude means that is ‘common’ that men die everyday, whereas Hamlet means it in a much more sarcastic way to say he thinks his mothers behaviour is vulgar and uncommon of a queen.
Act 1, Scene 2, analysis part 2. (Soliloquy)
-Shakespeares main artistic development is ‘Hamlet’ was the was developing the audience understanding of the protagonist inner life.
-Shakespeare uses soliloquies to dramatise the inner conflict of Hamlet as he wrestles to make sense of his life.
-Shakespeare uses disjointed rhythm and dislocated progress throughout the soliloquy which makes it sound improvised and unrehearsed, as well as really conveying Hamlet’s inner turmoil.
-Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition is shown through the contrast between Claudius rhetoric in the opening of the scene which seems superficially fluent, whereas Hamlet’s soliloquy is very fragmented and uneven.
-Hamlets lack of energy and enthusiasm is shown through the uneven tempo of the words, conveying his excessive mourning and melancholy.
-Hamlet illustrates what a great man his father was in contrast to the new king: “Hyperion to a satyr,” (Line 140) which shows how Claudius and his father are at opposite ends of the human spectrum. Old Hamlet is suggested as superhuman as ‘Hyperion’ is one of the titans, frequently identified as the sun god.
-Hamlet also conveys his almost epic love for his mother: “that he might not beteem the winds of heaven/ Visit her face too roughly” (Line 141-2)
-Hamlet’s hissing sibilants convey the repulsion of his thoughts of Gertrude and Claudius together: “Oh most wicked speed, to post/ With such dexterity to incestuous sheets.”
-Hamlet feels he is bound to suffer in silence: “But break, my heart, for I must hold my tongue.” (line 158)
for the audience there is irony in Hamlet’s words as they know of the Ghost of his father and the unlikely situation of him suffering in silence.
Act 1, Scene 3, summary
- Scene opens with Laertes and Ophelia having a conversation, in which Laertes warns his sister about Hamlet and her own sexuality.
- Polonius enters and gives his son advice on how to conduct himself, before he departs for Paris.
- Polonius commands Ophelia to reject Hamlet unless he offers her more, which she obeys: “do not believe his vows, for they are brokers,” (Line 127)
Act 1, Scene 3, analysis
- Laertes is superficially caring when her warns Ophelia to be wary of Hamlet’s love since it may not last. - However when Laertes proceeds to talk about her sexuality his language becomes surprising: Desire is ‘danger’ (Line 35) ‘canker’ (Line 39) ‘contagious basements’ (Line 42)
- The vehemence imagery reminds the audience of Hamlet’s reaction to his mother’s marriage in the previous scene.
- This adds to the pervasive feeling that “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” (Act 1, Scene 4)
- Ophelia never talks about her love for Hamlet, only Hamlet’s love for her.
- She has no trouble revealing the secret that was made the line before which Laertes have the ‘key’ (s) to Polonius, or denying Hamlet further audience as her father commands.
Feminist Criticism - Ophelia
- Feminists cite this scene as evidence of the powerlessness of women in a patriarchy.
- Ophelia (name means servant women) is dramatically different to many other Shakespearean women who can resist bullying fathers and even tyrannical Kings.
- A.C. Bradley suggest that Ophelias behaviour is limited by Shakespeare for the benefit of the plot.
Act 1, Scene 4, summary
- It is coming up to or just struck (with a silent mark) midnight on the Battlements of Elsinore castle where Hamlet, Horatio and Marcellus wait for the ghost to reveal itself.
- The ghost ‘beckons’ Hamlet to follow it, but Marcellus and Horatio insist it doesn’t follow them as it might lead him to harm.
- Despite Horatio and Marcellus best efforts, Hamlet follows the ghost. (In most plays Hamlet tears free from both Horatio and Marcellus be threatening them with a weapon.)
Act 1, Scene 5, summary
- Hamlet follows the Ghost, leaving Horatio and Marcellus.
- The Ghost tells Hamlet: “I am thy father’s spirit,” (Line 9)
- The Ghost describes his suffering in purgatory: ‘Condemned to fast in the fires.’ (Line 9)
- The Ghost tells Hamlet to avenge his murder by Claudius, and spare adulterous Gertrude.
- Horatio and Marcellus enter, and Hamlet swears them to secrecy on what he’s just learned. Hamlet informs them of his ‘antic disposition’ he might put on. (Line 172)
Act 1, Scene 4-5, analysis
- Hamlet describes Claudius heavy drinking using alliteration and assonance: ‘doth wake…/ keeps wassail and the swaggering up spring reels,/…drains his draughts of Rhenish down…/This heavy-headed revel’ (1.4.8-17)
- Together, these effects and the trumpets ‘braying’ create and impression of vulgarity.
- It develops the theme of disease and introduces the related theme of poisoning.
- The Danes reputation is soiled by the habit of heavy drinking in the same way that one man’s fame can be tarnished by one single weakness. - Many critics see this interlude as typical of Shakespearean tragedy: Othello, Macbeth, Lear and Cornillius are all protagonists with one defect. (1.4.31)
- It is up to the audience to interpret if Hamlet is also a protagonist who conforms to the conventions of shakespearean tragedy and has one defect.
-The third apperence of the Ghost, it finally has a voice.
-Hamlet’s first response is to call for protection: “Angels and ministers of grace defend us!” (line 39)
-The Ghost’s presence confuses the distinctions between past, present and future; this world and the next; the living and the dead; heaven, earth and hell:
“Be thou a spirit of health, or goblin damned/ Bring with thee airs from heaven of blasts from hell.” (Line 40-41)
-Hamlet’s antithesis spells out Hamlet’s exactly ethical dilemma.
THE PROBLEM WITH THE GHOST
- Shakespeare explores what happens when someone has ‘more than mortal knowledge’ (Macbeth)
- Similarly, Hamlet is tempted by ‘thoughts beyond the reaches of our soul.’ (1.4.56)
- The simplistic reading of the ghost would suggest it’s a wicked spirit intent on corrupting Hamlet’s soul.
- The ghosts truth have the potential to lead Hamlet to damnation.
- Hamlet’s words: ‘I do not set my life at a pin’s fee / and for my soul, what can it do to that…? (1.4.65-66) are ironic, for it is Hamlets soul at risk.
Contradictions
- The Ghost instructions are full of contradictions.
- He tells Hamlet about purgatory and his sufferings there before ordering him to avenge his murder by Claudius, even though (ironically) through doing so, he is Condemning Hamlet to the same fate.
- This scene introduces one of the ideologies that Hamlet must battle with throughout the play: Avenging his father, and taking the law into his own hands, or obeying God.
Poison
- Some critics argue that the Ghost is poisoning Hamlet’s mind. His orders are fell of double messages, should the Ghost be allowed to dictate if Hamlet goes to Hell or Heaven.
- The Ghost describes the murder so graphically, that it cannot be forgotten - but in describing the murder in this way, could the ghost be said to pour poison in Hamlet’s ear?
Quotation analysis- Goethe thinks these two lines are the key to Hamlet’s whole procedure… The effect of a great action laid upon the soul unfit for the performance.
“The time is out of joint: O cursed spite
That ever I was born to set it right.” (1.5.89-90)
- Time itself has been disrupted by Old Hamlet’s murder.
- Hamlet wonders if he is equal to set the task right, it is a much larger task than just pure vengeance.
- Hamlet also feels it is his duty not to leave Gertrude to heaven, but to persuade her to acknowledge her sins and repent - Therefore ‘Set it right’ does not just refer to bloody revenge.
Act 2, Scene 1, summary
- Polonius sends his servant Reynaldo to spy on his son, Laertes, whilst he is away in Paris.
- Ophelia enters and reports Hamlet’s strange behaviour and appearance to her father.
- Most critics assume this scene takes place a number of weeks after the first act.
Act 2, Scene 1, analysis
- The reason the audience interpret that this scene takes place a number of weeks after the first act, is because Laertes has been there long enough to run out of money, as connoted by Polonius in line 1: “Give him this money, and these notes,”
- Before Reynaldo is to visit him, he is to ‘make inquire/ of his behaviour.’ (Line 3-4) Polonius asking Reynaldo to spy before giving him the money and notes.
- Some critics have suggested that Polonius is a satiric portrait of Burghley, Queen Elizabeth’s chief minister, he is said to have created a list of rules for his son and to have him spied upon whilst he’s in Paris.
- We see that Polonius has a tendency to lose his thread every now and again: ‘What was I about to say?’ (Line 49) It is up to the Director to interpret how much of a pedantic fool Polonius is.
- When Polonius refers to ‘tennis’ (Line 58) He means tennis which at the time was not at all a respectable past time.
- Critics interpret Hamlet’s dumbshow, as described by Ophelia, as one of the most puzzling parts of the play.
- The language Ophelia uses to describe Hamlet’s appearance and behaviour ‘Pale as a shirt…/As if he had been loosed out of hell/ To speak of horrors’ (Lines 79-82) conotes that Hamlet has just had the meeting with the Ghost, but all the other evidence in the scene suggests to this scene taking place weeks after the Ghost and Prince’s meeting. (Evidence being Reynaldo’s appearance and the arrival of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.)
- This leads some critics to believe that Hamlet is doing what he anticipated doing in Act 1, Scene 5: ‘put an antic disposition on’ (Line 172)
- They interpret Hamlet’s disorderly appearance as Hamlet playing with Polonius and the King (as he knows Ophelia will report his behaviour to her father, and Polonius will report it to the king)
- They argue that Hamlet is buying time and scope for his revenge by appearing mad, and therefore harmless.
-It is important to remember Shakespeare was often careless about chronology: he might have written this scene unaware that some of the textual details connote it takes place several weeks after the encounter with the Ghost.
- When Hamlet receives the Ghost’s commandment to get revenge, Hamlet vowed he would pursue revenge single mindedly: “I’ll wipe away all trivial fond records…” (1.5.99-106) This sentiment could be interpreted as Hamlet saying his Goodbyes to Ophelia.
- The way Polonius deals with Ophelia resembles how the Ghost treated Hamlet in the scene prior. Very one sided, no interest in how her daughter is really feeling.
- Feminist critics can again use this scene to show that Ophelia has no scope for following her own wishes.
-
Act 2, Scene 2, summary
- Claudius greets Hamlet’s friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, and asks them to spy on Hamlet for him.
- Polonius reports to the king of Hamlet’s ‘lunacy’ (Line 49) Gertrude offers her own interpretation of her son’s ‘distemper’ (line 57) that it is to do with Old Hamlet’s death.
- The ambassadors Claudius sent return from Norway.
- The king (acting of Polonius’s advice) sets up a meeting between Hamlet and Ophelia, in which he and Polonius will eavesdrop.
- Hamlet taunts Polonius after their first meeting and calls him a ‘fishmonger’ (line 172)
- Hamlet forces Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to confess that the King sent for them.
- The Players arrive, first Player delivers the Hecuba speech.
- In Hamlet’s soliloquy, Hamlet questions his delay on his task and shares with the audience the idea of ‘The Mousetrap’ (play within the play).
Act 2, Scene 2, analysis
- The first part of the scene show the isolation and victimisation of Hamlet (through the plotting against him by Claudius and Polonius) which makes it more likely for the audience to sympathise with him. However, it is up to each director to interpret when Hamlet comes in in this scene, if he hears their conversation. Some might argue if the audience know Hamlet is listening to the conversation he might be less of a victim (as he is also plotting, him listening gives him the upper hand). John Dover Wilson in ‘What Happens in Hamlet’ suggests Hamlet is listening to all this conversation.
- This is the longest scene of the play. Polonius comment ‘This is taking too long’ (line 456) could be drawing a parallel with the fact that this scene is so long (558 lines) It could also be recognised by critics as Shakespeare anticipating criticism of ‘Hamlet’. As the play itself is more than twice as long as ‘Macbeth’ and stands as Shakespeare’s longest play.
- Similarly to Ophelia, we see that Hamlet’s friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern have no hesitation with allowing themselves to be used against their supposed friend.
- Like her son, Gertrude now views the marriage as ‘o’erhasty’ (line 57) which is the antithesis of the woman we saw in act 1, scene 2.
- There are connotations of maternal concern in Gertrude’s description of her ‘too much changed son’ (line 36) and later with her words: “look where sadly the poor wretch comes.” (line 166)
- Polonius is a Bawd: When Polonius proposes the use of his daughter for spying on Hamlet, his language ‘loos[ing] [his] daughter’ (line 160) like a caged bird develops the idea that polonius is a pimp (Bawd). ‘I’ll board him presently’ (line 168) puns on the word Bawd. Via talking about ‘loosing’, Ophelia’ Polonius implies that most of the time he keeps her locked up.
- Although when Hamlet calls Polonius a ‘fishmonger’ (line 172) and we’re fairly sure he means fishmonger, some critics interpret fishmonger as brothel keeper, which is entirely appropriate after the earlier events of the scene. This makes Hamlet’s ‘antic disposition’ more the freedom to voice uncomfortable truths than a pretence of insanity. This also links to John Dover Wilson’s understanding of Hamlet listening to the whole conversation, as he has never met Polonius, so how would he know what he was like? (bawd)
- In Claudius court, even Polonius thinks to be honest is ‘to be one man picked out of ten thousand’ (line 177). Madness can be defined as being in a minority of one.
Act 2, Scene 2, analysis (Part 2)
Students from Wittenburg
- We get a glimpse of Hamlets intellectual energy as he instantly reads Rosencrantz and Guildenstern for what they really are.
- Hamlet’s famous line: “for there is nothing really good or bad but thinking makes it so.” (line 239-40) has many meanings. He probably does not believe that all truth is relative; rather, that people have duty to think and thus work out the difference between good or bad.
- In Hamlet’s conversation with his fellow students, they converse about Denmark being the good prison, introducing the theme that Elsinore is a prison - Beautifully illustrated in Kozinstev’s Hamlet, with it’s massive imagery of stone walls, bars, heavy portcullis and Ophelia’s controlled behaviour all connote to Elsinore being a prison.
Decedent Denmark
- Hamlet is instantly energised as the plan to stage ‘The Mousetrap’ comes to hand: ‘he that plays the king shall be welcome’ (line 298)
- At request of Hamlet, player 1 recites a poem from Hamlet’s favourite episode from the Trojan Virus. The focus is not upon the King, but the grief of the lyal queen, Hecuba.
- A moment of the speech is a curious foretaste of Hamlet’s next soliloquy in which he berates himself for delay: ‘seemed i’th ‘air to stick… did nothing.’ (lines 437-40) The image foreshadows the episode in the chapel where Hamlet’s impulse to kill Claudius clashes with his willingness to think things through.
Hamlet’s second Soliloquy
-
-The soliloquy ends with a rhyming couplet in which Hamlet appears to have regained his momentum:”The play’s the thing/ Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the King.” (line 557-558)
Act 3, Scene 1, summary
- This scene takes place the following day.
- Hamlet’s ‘crafty madness’ (line 8) is discussed; as Ophelia gets ready to act as a decoy, Claudius reveals his guilty conscience for the first time.
- Hamlet’s fourth soliloquy: ‘to be or not to be’ (line 56)
- Claudius and Polonius eavesdrop oh Hamlet and Ophelia’s bitter conversation. At some point Hamlet realises it’s set up: Often a noise makes Hamlet question where Polonius is (‘Where is your father?’) and he realises she’s spying.
- Ophelia expresses her dismay for Hamlet’s ‘ecstasy’ (line 154)
- Convinced that Hamlet in not mad but may be meditating revenge, Claudius decides with ‘quick determination’ (line 162) to send him to England.
- Polonius proposes spying on Hamlet again, this time in Gertrude’s room. Claudius agrees, pretending he thinks Hamlet is mad and therefore needs watching.
Act 3, Scene 1, analysis
- Claudius concern that his spies will come up with something worse than Polonius predicted prepares us for his agonised soliloquy in Act 3, scene 3.
- He talks about Hamlet’s ‘turbulent and dangerous lunacy’ (line 4) although we’ve not seen any of it.
- Guildenstern deepens the kings suspicion that Hamlet’s antic is ‘put on’ (line 2) by accusing him of ‘crafty madness’ (line 8).
- The Ghost’s honesty is reinforced in lines 50-54, as Claudius appears as much more psychologically developed and interesting character than the smiling Villain in act 1, scene 2.
- Claudius imagining himself as a prostitute foreshadows the curious way that both Hamlet and Ophelia refer to him as a women in Act 4.
Act 3, scene 1, analysis (to be or not to be)
‘To be or not to be’ - Soliloquy
- The thinking man’s soliloquy
- The purpose of this soliloquy is to establish Hamlet as characteristically detached, reflective and moral - and as someone completely unlike the active, simple minded hero figures.
- It is a calm philosophical consideration of the popular renaissance theme of whether our troublesome life is worth living.
- Defected tone and tempo, contrasting to the soliloquies we have seen in the previous scenes, which are filled with nervous energy and abrupt changes of direction.
- Alex Newell describes Hamlet’s soliloquy as ‘entirely motivated by reason, untouched by passion. In its academic method and style, the speech carries the stamp of Hamlet’s identity as a student, formally posing a “question” or topic for debate’, ‘The soliloquies in Hamlet’ (1991)
- The Prince seems to reflect on the human condition, before analysing his immediate situation; ‘fardels’ and ‘To grunt and sweat under a weary life,’ (lines 76-77)
- He never uses personal pronouns such as ‘I’ and ‘me’; the ideas he explores are expressed more as general truths: ‘Thus conscience does make cowards of us all,’ (line 83)
- No detail demonstrates how detached Hamlet’s mind is from everything that has happened to him than his statement that ‘no traveller returns’ (line 80)
- Hamlet and the audience contrast in the way that Hamlet appears to have forgotten the Ghost’s words ‘Remember me.’ (1.5.91) Whereas the audience have not..
Hamlet’s morality of suicide.
- The problem of the Ghost shapes direction for this soliloquy.
- What Hamlet initially addresses is whether, in the face of suffering, he is morally right to contemplate suicide, something he has longed for (although he knows that at the time it was heavily frowned upon) since his first soliloquy.
- The metaphor, ‘to take arms against a sea of troubles,/ And by opposing end them’ (lines 59-60) is perhaps deliberately confused. Some argue that it captures Hamlet’s feelings that he is unequal to the task that has been assigned to him. He thinks that trying to set things right would be like committing suicide. But in the rest of the speech, the argument against suicide is explored not so much as an ethical as a psychological issue. If death were like a deep sleep, suicide would be a very attractive alternative to the ‘thousand natural shocks (line 62) we all suffer. But when we sleep, we dream, suggesting that death is not simply oblivion; what we all suffer in life may be less awful than what we suffer in the afterlife: The Ghost has shown this to be true. “And thus the native hue of resolution/ Is slicked o’er with the pale cast of thought’ (lines 84-85).
- Suddenly we see how this reflection is linked with Hamlet’s thinking about the Ghost’s ‘commandment’ and his reluctance to commit murder.
Act 3, scene 1, analysis, The Nunnery episode
- Although Gertrude is on stage for the planning of the spying, she takes no part in it. This helps the audience focus on Claudius as Hamlet’s enemy and prepares us for Gertrude to become loyal to Hamlet in the second half of the play.
- Ophelia has distanced herself from Hamlet, and allowed herself to be used by Hamlet.
- This episode has striking similarities with act 3, scene 4, where Gertrude is confronted by Hamlet. Hamlet’s need to confront women in his life who he feels have betrayed him is explosive.
- The progress of the two episodes differs because of the two eavesdroppers in the nunnery episode.
- When Hamlet advises Ophelia to enter a ‘nunnery’ (lines 119-26)
- Whether he is suggesting she enter a convent to escape the corrupt world of Elsinore or, believing that she has sold herself already, is suggesting she work in a brothel is a matter for debate: in Elizabethan times, the word ‘nunnery’ could be either.
- Hamlet’s immediate reaction to coming across Ophelia is affectionate. The very sounds of his words ‘soft… fair ophelia… orisons’ (lines 88-9) convey a tender reaction.
- ‘Fair’ is a very complex word; It implies beauty, honesty, gentleness, loyalty and honesty. Ophelia may superficially appear fair, but is not.
- When Ophelia tells a direct lie, Hamlet explodes with fury, partly directed at her, partly directed towards the eavesdroppers: ‘I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious’ (line 122) is obviously intended for Claudius ears.
- Hamlet sees Ophelia as frailty and deceptiveness personified: ‘I have heard of your paintings… you jig, you amble… and make your wantonness your ignorance.’ (lines 137-40)
- It is unclear as what point Hamlet realises he’s being listened to, certainly when Ophelia lies her father is ‘at home’ he knows he’s being eavesdropped on. It is up to the director to show just when Hamlet finds out that there are people listening to his conversation with Ophelia.
- When Ophelia interprets Hamlet’s behaviour as madness she avoids any examination of the part she may have played in causing Hamlet’s distress or causing his criticism -We can blame Ophelia for the lack of honesty, or Shakespeare for not debating the character.
-As far as Claudius is concerned, this trap has worked. Thinking that Claudius’s hypothesis of love sickness being incorrect, and questioning whether Hamlet is indeed meditating revenge, he decides with ‘quick determination’ (line 162) to send him to England.
Act 3, scene 2, summary
- Hours later than the scene prior, Hamlet coaches the actors.
- He declares his love and admiration to Horatio; and talks crudely and bitterly to Ophelia.
- The play within a play.
- Hamlet and Horatio monitor Claudius’s reaction to the play. The dumbshow represents the events described by the Ghost but also show Gertrude’s seduction after the murder.
- The first scene of the play focuses on the Queen’s vows of monogamy. Gertrude thinks ‘the lady doth protest to much.’ (line 211)
- The second scene focuses on the poisoning of the King.
- Claudius leaves ‘marvellous distempered’ (line 273)
- Hamlet is convinced that the Ghost has been proven right; Horatio reserves judgement.
- Hamlet mocks Rosencrantz, Guildenstern and Polonius.
- Preparing to visit his mother, he delivers a short soliloquy.
Act 3, scene 2, analysis
-Hamlet’s advice to the players for the play within the play displays a professional man of the theatre’s insight and experience.
-‘The Murder of Gonzago’ is written in rhyming couplets to sound quaint.
-When Hamlet coaches the players he speaks of overacting that ‘out Herods Herod’ (line 11). In medieval mystery plays, Herod was presented as a loud-mouthed tyrant.
-Hamlet expresses his true love and admiration for Horatio, after the distressing exchanges with Ophelia.
-Hamlet admires the composure of the scholar who ‘ suffering all… suffers nothing’ (line 56) who is not ‘passion’s slave’ (line 62).
-Horatio’s love for Hamlet unconditionally emerges and is shown through his attempt at suicide at Hamlet’s death.
-Hamlet asks Horatio to help him judge Claudius’s reaction to the play: In a conversation we have not seen, Hamlet tells horatio about the Ghost’s story.
-Hamlet speaks to Claudius more coarsely than to Ophelia in the previous scene.
-Hamlet’s exchange (lines 86-94) Polonius is a moment of dark comedy.
-The Queens Conscience
-Although at first, Hamlet said that ‘The play’s the thing/ Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the king.’ (act 2, scene 2) his production is first used to catch the conscience of his mother. Hamlet names the play ‘The Mousetrap’ (line 216) later he will imagine Claudius in bed with Gertrude calling her ‘his mouse’ (3.4.184). When he kills Polonius believing it is the king he calls him not a mouse but ‘a rat’ (3.4.24).
-The Player queen gives dramatic expression to the idea ‘frailty, thy name is woman; (1.2.146). Suggested when Gertrude states ‘the lady doth protest too much’ (line 211)
Exposing Claudius.
-Hamlet announces that the murderer, Lucianus, is the King’s nephew, not brother.
-Hamlet becomes increasingly agitated in as this scene goes on, as Claudius shows no obvious reaction. This is shown through the repeated outbursts and interruptions of Hamlet, until his final outburst, which is most often interpreted as a desperate attempt to provoke a response from a man who has his conscience under control.
-Exhilaration gives way to a melodramatic language mimicking of Lucianus. The nephew about to murder his uncle. Yet his next move isn’t to hunt Claudius, but Gertrude: ‘I will speak daggers to her but use none’ (line 357) - An irony as in his mother’s room he will kill Polonius and set in line a train of events out of his control.
Act 3, scene 3, summary
- Claudius accelerates his plan to ship Hamlet to England.
- Rosencrantz and Guildenstern justify the kings decisive action.
- In soliloquy, we hear Claudius struggling with his guilty conscience.
- With Claudius at his mercy, Hamlet explores why he is unable to kill the king in his sixth soliloquy.
Act 3, scene 3, analysis
Multiple interpretations of Claudius - A Tragic Hero?
-Shakespeare allows us to explore a character utterly different from Hamlet in Claudius’s soliloquy.
-In a play longer than any other Shakespeare, it is important to note the he barely has the scope to develop the Claudius’s inner self in Acts 4 and 5.
-But the dramatisation gives us insight into the man who had appeared to be a one dimensional smiling villain. Nothing comparable in any other revenge tragedy.
-Claudius is clear and frank, his confession is comprehensive and unflinching. He confirms the Ghost’s account, identifies his own weakness, but is still unable to repent.
-He testifies to the nature of the moral universe in which we must read the play: ‘In the corrupted currents of this world/Offence’s gilded hand must shove my justice,/… But
‘tis not so above’ (lines 57-60) - The man who appeared to be the machiavellian pragmatist is revealed as a christian trembling at the prospect of divine Judgement.
-He conveys vividly his position in the imagery of a bird trapped on a sticky branch: ‘Oh limed soul that struggling to be free/Art more engaged’ (lines 68-9)
-His flued sentences give way to anguished exclamation in the final sentences - the audience see the man who they think Claudius really is.
Hamlet’s sixth soliloquy
- Shakespeare juxtaposes Claudius’s anguished soliloquy with another one of Hamlet’s. (Unparalleled dramatic contrast)
- Although both men are thinking about crime and punishment, heaven and damnation, Old Hamlet and Gertrude, Shakespeare makes Hamlet and Claudius sound completely different through characteristic thought pattern, tone and rhythms,
- Sixth soliloquy is superficially straight forward. It begins with tripping monosyllables: ‘Now might I do it pat’ (line 73) and presents Hamlet, who was focused on going to see Gertrude, momentarily distracted by this unexpected opportunity to carry out the Ghost’s order.
- Hamlet toys with the idea of killing Claudius here, but opts against it, even though in act 3 scene 4, he has no hesitation in killing who he thinks is Claudius (actually Polonius) behind the arras. Opting out of killing Claudius here will have catastrophic consequences.
- Dr Johnson (A critic much closer to Shakespeare’s time) was dismayed by the callousness in this speech. Hamlets desire to send Claudius to hell was ‘too horrible to be read’, Dr Johnson’s notes on plays.
DIVINE JUDGEMENT
- Claudius talk of heaven and hell makes the audience understand that in elizabethan times, the life to come is intensely perceived as the current one. When Hamlet weighs up whether to go to heaven or hell, he is intensely serious, he has no doubt that such places do exist.
- Many critics argue that what we hear is Hamlet rationalising: satisfying his obligation to his father in the very act of refusing to do the Ghost’s bidding, he believes that killing Claudius now would be ‘hire at salary, not revenge.’ (line 79)
- But as a sincere christian, Hamlet can surely not kill a man at prayer.
There are many parallels to ‘The Revengers Tragedy’ in Hamlet. Linking to superficiality and Hamlets inability to perform the ghosts command, Vindice is able to carry out his revenge in Act 3 of ‘TRT’. It is arguable that Vindice is a far more superficial Revenger, he knows his task and there is no inner struggle for him to come to terms with. Critics argue that as we don’t know when Vindice lost his love a long time before the play takes place, allowing him to become the weapon he is, where as Hamlet, with his father only ‘two months dead’ (1.2.138) still has the ability to be the rational thinker.
Act 3, scene 4, summary
- Polonius urges Gertrude to ‘lay home’ to Hamlet and eavesdrops on their conversation.
- Gertrude attempts to reprimand Hamlet, but he angrily admonishes her. Her fearful cry is taken up by Polonius; Hamlet kills him, thinking he has killed the king.
- Discovering his error, he expresses contempt for Polonius and his interfering.
- Hamlet accuses his mother of involvement of Old Hamlet’s murder and incest. Gertrude’s response suggests she knew nothing of the assassination; Hamlet chastises what he sees as her sexual depravity.
- The Ghost reappears to wet Hamlet’s ‘almost blunted purpose’ (line 110) and to entreat him to support the queen.
- Gertrude doesn’t see the Ghost and thinks Hamlet is mad.
- Hamlet convinces her of his sanity and urges her to stay away from Claudius’s bed. He then play’s devil’s advocate, telling her to reveal his plans to the King.
- Gertrude promises not to reveal Hamlet’s secrets.