H5:: corporate-level strategy Flashcards
corporate level strategy
definitie
how to compete succesfully (generate comp adv)/about to max econolic value by operating several activities
–> corporate level strategy is higher than business level strategy: takes place at CEO level
————————-
determining organizational scope:
- scope of activities
- scope of products and services
Scope of activities
value chain= discrete activities that must be accomplished to design, build en sell product or service
wich of these activities will company preform on their own and for wich of these companies will they involve other companies: MAKE OR BUY
INTEGRATION
explain
INTEGRATION= when company chooses to do something inside the company and integrate it
- BACKWARD INTEGRATION (UPSTREAM)
= moves up, bv from manufacturing to raw materials - FORWARD INTEGRATION (DOWNSTREAM)
= moves down, they take more responsibility
KIJK VOORBEELDEN IN SAMENVATTING
TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS
when is it best to integrate?
you make or buy it –> depending on what is cheaper
cheaper to make in house? -> do it
—> identifie sources of costs, both inside and outside the company
- EXTERNAL TRANSACTION COSTS= cost of transacting on the market (searching for partners); contractual agreement: write a contract and monitor it
- INTERNAL TRANSACTION COSTS= cost of transacting withing the firm; bv: hiring, salaries, supervising
make when:
- C house<C market: firms are lore efficient in organizing economic activity
- C house > C market: markets are more efficient in organizing economic activity
threat of opportunism
chance that company will take advantage of the relationship- exploit vulnerability of the other partner –> the lower the thrust u have in the company u work with the higher the threat of opportunity
threat of opportunism
(1) level of uncertainty and complexity
to what extend possible to expect or anticipate all the complexities and possible opportunistic behaviors by the partner
INCOMPLETE CONTRACTING:
- IDEAL: possible to expect all the possible sources of opportunism
- REALITY: contracts arent very effective, because cannot expect all wrong things
–> more unceartainty and complexity= great threat of opportunism
threat of opportunism
(2) level of transactions-specific investment
= assets that have significantly more value in intended use than in their other best use
- intended use: is to make that logo, but the moment toyota not interested anymore, the next best use is not existing
- the bigger the difference between intended use and second best use: the higher the risk
the more specific investment needed for a deal= greater threat of opportunism
–> as a supplier afraid that if you make these investments, you will lose IF the partner behaves opportunistically and no longer wants the parts
WHY integrate?
resolve threat of opportunism through integration
IMPROVE EFFICIENCY
- command and control
- coordinate
- transaction specific investments
REDUCE EFFICIENCY
- administrative costs
- low powered incentives –> not motivated, just an employee
How does integration help companies create greater economic value
by using right corporate level strategy, firm can create great economic value by reducing costs
DIVERSIFICATION
definition
relative and not relative
defining scope of products that the company wants to offer to the customers
–> deciding range of products that the company wants to offer
- RELATIVE= company is diversified but industries have links with each other
- UNRELATED DIVERSIFICATION= very little common attributed of the activities
when does diversification create economic value?
RELATED ECONOMIES OF SCOPE
with economies of scope= gain something from applying asset or resource to new markets/when u gain something
SOURCES OF ECONOMIES OF SCOPE:
1) operational economies of scope
= you can share activities (bv 3 product, 1 value chain)
2) financial economies of scope
= risk reduction when company is more diversified, tax advantages
3) anticompetitive economies of scope
= exploiting market power –> CROSS-SUBSIDIZATION= cover losses in one market with the profits of another.
Related economies of scope may backfire
- diversification gives rise to cots relating managing different business
- can be bad for reputation is some businesses underperform
unrelated diversification
does not fit well together
- financial economies of scope applies: risk reduction, tax advantages
- market power also applies: cross subsidization