H. sapiens Flashcards

1
Q

H. sapiens cranial anatomy

A
Chin - mental eminence
Small teeth
Small nose
More vertical forehead
Parietal bossing
Very small browridge
Rounded occipital
Small face
Depressed infraorbital region
Globular vault
Supracilliary eminance
Fine nasals
Non-prognathic face
Dental reduction
M1>M2>M3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Archaic vs anatomically modern H. sapiens

A

Archaic H. sapiens still retained some primitive features - H. rhodesiensis

‘Anatomically modern humans’ -> full suite of H. sapiens features
Early and recent H. sapiens still show clear differences

Substantial reduction in brain size from early to recent H. sapiens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

H. sapiens post-cranial anatomy

A

Lower body mass
Longer lower and upper limb bones
Narrowing of thoracic region
Narrowing of pelvic region

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-domestication in H. sapiens

A
Domesticated animal traits shared by H. sapiens:
Smaller crania and bodies
More gracile
Facial retrognathism
Smaller teeth
Reduced sexual dimorphism
Reduced agression
Domestic animal traits possibly shared by H. sapiens:
Variation in hair/coat
Increased fat storage
Greater breeding seasons
Increased lactation

Domestic animal traits not shared by H. sapiens:
Greater litter size

Mechanisms:
Inherited genetic changes - artificial or natural selection
Niche construction - created environments to suit our needs - CHANGED environments - modified selection pressures
Human cultural niche construction has essentially domesticated us?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Specimens postdating the likely divergence between Neanderthals and H. sapiens

A

Cannot be ancestral to both. African groups are more likely to be related to H. sapiens (based on biogeography) - or part of sister group

Ndutu, Tanzania - 350-400kya - gracile, small face, thin eyebrows

Kabwe,Zambia - 300kya - strong browridges, receding forehead, occipital torus

Eliye Springs, Kenya - 200-300kya - vertical frontal, rounded occipital

Bodo, Ethiopia - 600kya - large brain, projecting nose, parietal bossing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

First known H. sapiens

A

Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, 315kya

Derived H. sapiens traits:
Reduced browridge
Inflexed infraorbital region
Dental morphology
Presence of chin

Primitive traits:
Non-globular braincase
Associated with brain and behavioural differences between early and recent H. sapiens?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Early H. sapiens specimens

A

Jebel Irhoud, Morocco - 315kya

Misliya, Isarael - 190kya

Herto, Ethiopia - 160kya

Omo, Ethiopia - 190kya

Omo and Herto are the oldest hominins showing clear H. sapiens affinities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Omo 1 and Omo 2

A

Ethiopia, 195kya

Omo 1: H. sapiens derived traits - rounded occiptal, reduced browridge, chin

Omo 2: Bigger browridge, retreating frontal, thicker vault - more archaic

Different species/date? Variation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Herto

A

Ethiopia, 160-180kya

Largest cranium - 1450cc
Primitive: occipital and supraorbital ridges
Derived: globular neurocranium, retracted face

Ritual mortuary practice?
Cutmarks, polish on child’s skull
Different treatment to fauna

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Earliest evidence outside Africa

A

Misliya, Israel

Maxillary bone with teeth dated to 190kya

Small, modern-looking teeth
As old as (or even older than) Omo and Herto specimens

Age remains controversial - could be no more than 60-70kya

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Levantine modern humans

A

Qafzeh, Israel - 100kya

Skhūl, Israel - 120kya

Presence of both H. sapiens and Neanderthals

Possible location of interbreeding event(s)

Mousterian artefacts in sites of both species

Contact zone between Eurasia and Africa - dependent on climatic conditions

Skhūl/Qafzeh - short-lived expansion north or ancestors of eventual dispersal towards Australia?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Skhūl

A

Israel, 120kya

10 individuals - male, female and juvenile

Mixture of primitive and derived traits

Primitive - large browridges and prognathism

Deliberate burials -> good preservation

Reconstructions argued to obscure morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Qafzeh

A

~100kya, 14 individuals

Some elaborate (ritual?) burials
Qafzeh 11 child - skull and antlers of red deer
Qafzeh 9 - 6yo child across feet

Very unlike Neanderthals from same time period

Tall (170-180cm)

Derived traits: short crania, reduced browridges, high forehead, chin -different to Skhūl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

‘Failed’ dispersal?

A

75-130kya - warm interglacial period.
Skhūl/Qafzeh fossils correspond to a first wave of migration

60-75kya - cold glacial period.
Modern humans retreated during the following cold period.

25-60kya - warm interglacial period.
Successful later modern human migration.

12-25kya - cold glacial period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Asian modern humans

A

Until recently, H. sapiens presence outside Africa before 60kya was not accepted

  • Lacked clear chronostratigraphic context
  • Taxonomic assignment to H. sapiens was not clear

Increasing evidence for early H. sapiens in Asia

  • Some sites potentially >100kya
  • Chronologies and/or affinities are still disputed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Zhirendong

A

China
>100kya

Debated

  • Robust mandible but incipient chin
  • H. sapiens or gracile H. erectus?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Daoxian

A

Fuyan Cave, China

47 human teeth

80-120kya

Extremely modern-looking
Cavities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Al Wusta

A

Saudi Arabia, 85-95kya
Oldest directly dated fossil outside Africa or Levant

Modern human manual phalanx

Samples obtained from the fossil using laser ablation

19
Q

Australia

A

Separated from SE Asia by ocean - sea levels sometimes lower, exposing Sunda and Sahul shelf

Ocean-going craft required - explains why not colonised until H. sapiens

Rapid eastern and western routes that reached southern Australia by 45kya

Related to later Australian aboriginal populations

First Australians are very variable in morphology

Madjedbebe, Devil’s Lair, Lake Mungo

20
Q

Madjedbebe

A

Northern Australia, 65kya

Distinctive stone tool assemblage
Grinding stones, ground ochres, etc.

Clarkson et al 2017

21
Q

Lake Mungo

A

SE Australia, 30-50kya

Ochre
Relatively gracile fossils

22
Q

Devil’s Lair

A

SW Australia, 40kya

Artefacts - bone points, bone beads
Animal and plant remains

23
Q

Manot Cave

A

Israel, 55kya

Closer to Upper Palaeolithic Europeans than Levantine early modern humans

Relationship with European UP modern humans?

Hershkovitz et al 2015

24
Q

Grotta del Cavallo

A

Southern Italy, 43-45kya

Deciduous molars, originally classified as Neanderthals

New quantitative analysis show clear modern human affinity

Benazzi et al 2011

25
Grotta di Fumane
Northern Italy, 41kya Deciduous incisor Modern human mtDNA Benazzi et al 2014
26
Kent's Cavern
Devon, Britain, 42-44kya Shares more dental traits with modern humans than with Neanderthals Badly worn - many dental traits cannot be assessed Higham et al 2011
27
Cro Magnon
SW France, 28kya Cro Magnon 1 - old man (died in middle age) Skull surface eroded Evidence of pathology - fungal infection Cro Magnon 2 - younger female Not representative of Upper Palaeolithic H. sapiens - More gracile and 'modern' - more like extant humans
28
Possible migration routes to the Americas
1. Overland and through an ice-free corridor - Siberia inhabited by 39kya - Ice-free corridor closed between 20 and 13ya - Either 40-20kya or after 13kya 2. Bering island/coastal route 3. Across the Pacific Ocean 4. Across the frozen North Atlantic via Greenland
29
Meadowcroft Rock Shelter
Pennsylvania, USA, 17ya Only lithic remains Age suggests that humans got to North America before the closure of the ice free corridor from 20-13kya
30
Early North American fossils
Kennewick man - Washington state, USA, 9.4kya - Rasmussen et al. showed DNA relationship closer to east Siberia than Europe/south Pacific Spirit Cave - Nevada, USA 10.6kya
31
Monte Verde
Chile, 14.8kya Hut structures, evidence of complex subsistence strategy 1800 years before Bering Strait would have been passable - supports coastal route of pre-20kya migration
32
Models for the origin of H. sapiens
Replacement theory/recent African origin model (no hybridisation) - Modern humans evolved in Africa and replaced existing populations as they dispersed - Classic model based on analysis of mtDNA/mitochondrial Eve - Nuclear DNA disproves stirct interpretation Hybridisation model - African origin, hybridisation and replacement - Similar to RAO - More interbreeding between migrating early H. sapiens and indigenous hominins outside of Africa - Migration of African populations a key factor in emergence of modern Eurasians Assimilation (with replacement) model - African origin of modern H. sapiens - Significant interbreeding with other indigenous hominins - Limited impact on morphology - Differences with hybridisation model are subtle Multiregional evolution theory (most hybridisation) - Modern humans evolved concurrently from existing archaic populations all over the Old World - Neanderthals in Europe - H. erectus and H. heidelbergensis in Asia - H. rhodesiensis in Africa - Maintained species integrity because of constant gene flow - Large/visible impact on morphology Current model: OOA with assimilation/hybridisation
33
Hybridisation
Hybridisation did not have a limited impact - played a crucial role in driving behavioural and morphological modenity Morphology: creates novelty and increases variation Rapid morphological adaption to new environments Behavioural: drives innovation Mixing of different hominin cultures led to behavioural modernity Used to be a taboo topic but hot topic today - fossil recrd, experimental models, aDNA analysis, GWAS studies
34
Modern contemporary humans
Single species that evolved in Africa and spread across the globe BUT different extant human groups carry small amounts of genetic material from multiple extinct hominin groups due to past interbreeding. Limited mtDNA variation compared to apes - suggests modern humans organised recently Modern humans are genetically very similar - suggests significant gene flow Genetically homogenous but phenotypically very diverse
35
African modern human genetic variation
No Neanderthal or Denisovan DNA in African populations African populations genetically more diverse than non-Africans African populations are closer to the modern human origin 'Serial founder effect'
36
Serial founder effect
Explains the two defining features of human genetic variation 1. Genomes in Africa have many unique variants 2. Reduced genetic diversity outside of Africa
37
Modern human behaviour
Sophisticated stone, bone and wood tools Hunting and gathering of a diverse set of animals (both marine and terrestrial) and plants Symbolic behaviour including personal ornamentation, figurative art, and music Living shelters, burials Models of the evolution of behavioural modernity 1. Gradual African origin (beginning 200kya) 2. Punctuated late African origin (beginning 50kya) 3. Gradual origins across multiple continents and multiple hominin species (beginning 200kya)
38
Aurignacian stone tools
Mode 4, H. sapiens 36-28kya Succeeded by Gravettian (28-21kya), Solutrean (21-16.5kya) and Magdalenian (16.5-11kya) Blade-based technology Complex tools Regional variation in fairly sophisticated bifacial tools (cultural differences)
39
Hunting strategies
Advantages of projectiles (later stone age) - More success - Less risk - Survivorship increases - Competitive advantage
40
Art and music
After 40kya, in Europe and Africa Intensification and consistent presence of artistic behaviours - Cave art (high concentration of sites in France and Spain e.g. El Castillo 40kya and Altamira 15kya, Spain + Chauvet 32kya and Lascaux 17kya, France) - Portable art, including figurines - Music Cave art made using natural substances - red and yellow ochre, manganese, charcoal - create a variety of colours Different instruments - horsehair, sticks, and fingers used to apply paint Significance is unclear Magic purpose - improve hunting success Other ritualistic or symbolic purpose - naturalistic scenes, including animals that were not hunted ``` Venus figurines e.g. Brassempouy, France Dolní Věstonice, Czech Republic Venus of Willendorf, Austria Venus of Lespugue, France ``` Music: expression of social and emotional information Flutes made from animal bones Debate about Neanderthals having music traditions or not Clear that modern humans had them Personal ornamentation Shell beads Üçağızlı, Turkey, 40kya South Africa, 70kya
41
Burials
Lake Mungo, Australia, 30-50kya Sungir, Russia, 28kya Ochre Increased use of grave goods - beads etc. Concept of live after death?
42
Shelter
Mezhirich, Ukraine, 16kya Bones from at least 149 mammoths Evidence of increased mobility and portable protection from the environment
43
Subsistence strategies
EXPANDED SUBSISTENCE BASE More varied diet, which also included use of aquatic resources SETTLEMENT PATTERNS Sites occupied for longer periods and extensively modified Evidence of more permanent shelters e.g. mammoth bone shelters