H pylori Flashcards

1
Q

what is H. pylori

A

-Gram-negative, curved
or spiral bacterium
-Flagellated – highly motile
-Ideally adapted to survive in the human stomach (Potent producer of urease, which breaks down urea in gastric juice – has a little cloud that protects it, Protected from highly acidic environment)
-H. pylori is a small, curved, highly motile, Gram-negative bacillus that colonizes the mucus layer of the human stomach where it is ideally adapted to survive. It is a potent producer of urease, which breaks down urea in the gastric juice to produce carbon dioxide and two ammonium ions. The ammonium protects it from the highly acidic gastric environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

epidemiology of H. pylori infection

A
  • Person-to-person passage of H. pylori, gastric-oral and fecal-oral, are likely modes of transmission. H. pylori infection is usually acquired in childhood and becomes chronic if not cleared or treated. It is likely that in developed countries H. pylori is picked up from siblings, other children, or parents, predominantly by the gastro-oral route. In developing countries, fecal-oral transmission is important in acquiring infection.
  • H. pylori colonizes the human stomach, and various risk factors are associated with H. pylori infection: infection of family members; increased number of siblings (>2); crowded living conditions and clustering (eg, institutions, day-care centers, and health care facilities); poor sanitation (fecal contamination of water and food), and poor hygiene. Although day-care attendance appears to be moderately associated with H. pylori infection, the effect appears to be more substantial in areas with a high prevalence of infection.
  • The prevalence of H. pylori infection has been consistently found to be higher in adults than in children, likely reflecting a birth cohort effect caused by a higher incidence in the past due to poor living conditions and sanitation.
  • Most common mode of transmission is mother to child
  • If you don’t have H pylori now, you wont get it – adult to adult transmission is very rare, adult to child is common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

worldwide geography of H. pylori infection

A
  • Although H. pylori is estimated to inhabit more than half of the world’s population, prevalence rates vary widely between geographical regions and ethnic groups. While the map shown depicts a rough estimation of H. pylori prevalence, it should be noted that these data are derived from multiple studies in various populations/ethnicities across varying time periods and with significant methodologic differences (eg, method of diagnosis, number of patients).
  • Overall, rates of H. pylori infection are markedly higher among developing countries than developed countries. Prevalence rates approaching or exceeding 90% have been observed among various populations in Bangladesh, Egypt, Russia, Siberia, and Africa. In contrast, the prevalence of H. pylori infection among developed countries is substantially lower, with recent estimates ranging from 6.8% to 79% in the United States, 7.3% to 70% in Europe, and 15.5% to 23% in Australia. The dramatic differences in prevalence of H. pylori infection appears to be inversely proportional to socioeconomic status.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

H pylori in adults and children in the US

A
  • The highest rates of acquisition are before age 10 years3,4 and generally becomes a chronic infection without treatment5
  • Why talk about H. pylori today?
  • The actual prevalence of H. pylori among adults and children in the US may be higher than physicians realize.1,2
  • H. pylori is a common chronic infection that affects adults and children1,2
  • In the United States, approximately 25% of children had evidence of H. pylori infection (data from NHANES III survey of children aged 6 to 19 years) and approximately 30% of adults had evidence of H. pylori infection1,2
  • Research shows that the highest rates of acquisition of the infection are before the age of 10 years3,4
  • Without treatment, H. pylori may become a chronic infection that can last decades or be a lifelong infection5
  • Rates of H. pylori are notably higher in minority groups, as high as 65% in Mexican Americans, 52% in nonblack Hispanics compared with 21% in non-Hispanic whites6
  • A VA center study with 1200 patients aged 40-80 years showed higher prevalence among black males for any age group followed by Hispanic males and non Hispanic whites, respectively7
  • Highest prevalence is seen among black males aged 50-59 years7
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

race/ethnic disparities in H pylori

A
  • Substantial disparities in the prevalence of H. pylori seropositivity exist among different racial/ethnic groups in the United States. In this analysis involving data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999‒2000, H. pylori status was determined using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Among the 4145 participants aged 20 years or older with known H. pylori status, the age-standardized proportion of seropositivity was 30.7% (95% CI: 27.9‒33.6).
  • As shown, there is a higher prevalence of seropositivity among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans compared with that of non-Hispanic whites. Moreover, multivariate logistical analysis indicated that non-Hispanic black and Mexican American races/ethnicities have a significantly higher odds of H. pylori infection even after adjustment for age, socioeconomic factors, and country of origin. Further, the seropositivity by age curves shown suggests a high incidence of seropositivity in youth and early adulthood among these populations, followed by a significant decline in incidence with age. The factors driving sustained prevalence of seropositivity among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans remain uncertain and require further understanding of how H. pylori infection is transmitted and about lifetime rates of seroconversion and seroreversion in these groups.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

H. pylori infection

A
  • Acute H. pylori infection causes transient hypochlorhydria and is rarely diagnosed. Chronic gastritis will develop in virtually all persistently infected individuals, but 80-90% will not exhibit symptoms. The further clinical course is highly variable and depends on bacterial and host factors. Patients with higher acid output are likely to have antral-predominant gastritis, which predisposes them to duodenal ulcers (DU). Patients with lower acid output are more likely to have gastritis in the body of the stomach, which predisposes them to gastric ulcer (GU) and can initiate a sequence of events that, in rare cases, leads to gastric carcinoma. H. pylori infection induces the formation of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) in the gastric mucosa. Malignant lymphoma arising from such MALT tissue is a rare complication of H. pylori infection
  • Can cause cancer in the stomach!!! This is why we care about ulcers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

long term consequences of H pylori

A
  • If left untreated, infection with H. pylori can lead to serious long-term consequences.
  • Most infected individuals experience asymptomatic gastritis, although peptic ulceration may occur in 10%–15% of the infected population1
  • The incidence of gastric cancer is lower, with approximately 1% of infected individuals developing adenocarcinoma of the stomach (though in some countries the lifetime risk of gastric cancer is 11–12%2) and even fewer experiencing gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma1
  • H. pylori is recognized as the major trigger for a sequence of phenotypic changes in the gastric mucosa that may progress from inflammation to superficial gastritis, then onto chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and finally, carcinoma. In fact, the WHO and International Agency for Research on Cancer regard H. pylori as a Group 1 carcinogen3
  • The link between H. pylori infection and nonulcer dyspepsia remains controversial4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

who do you test for H pylori

A
  • All pts with positive test should be treated, so key issue is who to test?
  • Patients with active or historical PUD
  • Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma
  • History of gastric cancer
  • Uninvestigated dyspepsia <60 years and w/o alarm features
  • ? Iron deficiency, pre-bariatric surgery, ITP, family hx gastric CA, prior to long-term NSAID Rx
  • Patients with nonulcer dyspepsia
  • Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • Persons using NSAIDs
  • Patients with unexplained iron deficiency anemia
  • Populations at higher risk for gastric cancer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gastric cancer in the US

A
  • An estimated 21,600 new cases of gastric cancer annually
  • > 10,000 deaths per year
  • Cancer incidence patterns among first-generation immigrants nearly identical to those of their native country
  • Gastric cancer continues to pose considerable burden in the United States, and an estimated 21,600 new cases will be diagnosed in 2013 and almost 11,000 men and women will die of the disease in 2013.
  • As shown (right), based on patients diagnosed in the United States from 2006‒2010, the age-adjusted incidence rates were highest among blacks (16.1 and 8.7 per 100,000 for males and females, respectively), followed by Asian/Pacific Islanders (15.5 and 9.3 per 100,000), Hispanics (14.9 and 8.6 per 100,000), American Indian/Alaska Natives (13.1 and 7.7 per 100,000), and whites (9.2 and 4.5 per 100,000).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

can H. pylori treatment reduce the risk for gastric cancer

A

-The effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in reducing risk for gastric cancer was also assessed in this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-The pooled analysis of 6 studies that included a total of 6695 patients with
4–10 years of follow-up showed that eradication treatment reduced gastric cancer risk
-Notably, the majority of these trials were conducted in Asia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

test and treat strategy

A
  • The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Medical Position Statement on Evaluation of Dyspepsia is outlined in this slide. The recommendation to test and treat is based on randomized controlled trials and the possible impact of eradication in preventing future gastric adenocarcinoma.
  • Both the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) recognize alarm features, or “red flags,” that help identify patients who need early/prompt investigation with endoscopy in order to rule out peptic ulcer diseases, esophagogastric malignancy, and other rare GI tract diseases.
  • Dyspeptic patients more than 55 years old, or those with alarm features, should undergo prompt endoscopy to rule out peptic ulcer disease, esophagogastric malignancy, and other rare upper gastrointestinal tract disease.
  • In patients aged 55 years or younger with no alarm features, test and treat for H. pylori using a validated, non-invasive test and a trial of acid suppression if eradication is successful. H. pylori testing is optimally performed by a 13C-urea breath test or stool antigen test, which are discussed later. If symptoms do not resolve, an empiric trial of acid suppression with a PPI for 4 weeks is recommended. In patients who are H. pylori negative, a PPI trial of 4-6 weeks is recommended. The patient may need reassurance or a reassessment of diagnosis if there is no response, and an EGD may then be considered.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

helicobacter and functional dyspepsia

A
  • Review of all well-designed studies indicates a statistically significant benefit in the successful eradication of HP in uninvestigated dyspepsia
  • Unfortunately the magnitude of the benefit is small: 5-10% reduction in dyspepsia vs placebo
  • The critical and unresolved issue is whether the marginal benefit of eradication of HP for dyspepsia is sufficient to justify antibiotic therapy in all patients
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ACG guidelines: preventing NSAID-related ulcers

A

-“H. pylori infection increases the risk of NSAID-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications”
-“There is potential advantage of testing for
H. pylori infection and eradicating the infection
if positive in patients requiring long-term NSAID therapy”
-“All patients regardless of risk status who are about to start long-term traditional NSAID therapy should be considered for testing for H. pylori and treated, if positive”
-This slide outlines the recent ACG practice guidelines on the prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications. The guidelines discuss the results of a meta-analysis that concluded that H. pylori infection increases the risk of NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications. Thus, the ACG recommends that there is potential advantage to testing for H. pylori infection and eradicating the infection in H. pylori-positive-patients requiring long-term NSAID therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

are there possible benefits of H. pylori infection

A
  • Despite the well-recognized associations of H. pylori infection with peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, and gastric carcinoma, a growing number of studies suggest that H. pylori infection may be protective of certain conditions
  • GERD, obesity, diarrhea, Barrett’s esophagus, IBD, Asthma, Allergy, Dermatitis, Esophageal eosinophilia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Options for H. pylori testing

A
  • Endoscopic: Easy, accurate and inexpensive, IF endosopy appropriate (nut bot an appropriate sole indication for EGD)
  • Non-Endoscopic (Passive: serology, Active: Urea breath test (UBT), Stool antigen test)
  • Methods available for detecting current infection of H. pylori are divided into two groups: invasive (endoscopic) or non-invasive (non-endoscopic). Testing for H. pylori is routinely undertaken non-endoscopically using serology, UBT, or stool antigen detection. Testing can also be undertaken at endoscopy via biopsies, histology, or culture.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

rapid urease test

A
  • Excellent specificity and very good sensitivity
  • Provides rapid results
  • Sensitivity significantly reduced in the post-treatment setting or in patients taking PPIs
17
Q

tests for H. pylori

A
  • rapid urease test
  • histology
  • culture
  • Overall, the biopsy-based diagnostic tests for H. pylori have excellent specificity for the organism. The rapid urease test, which identifies active H. pylori infection through the organism’s urease activity, is a practical test for patients not taking antibiotics, bismuth, or PPIs who require upper endoscopy. However, its sensitivity is significantly reduced in the post-treatment setting, and is rarely used as a sole means of identifying H. pylori infection. Although histology is sometimes considered the gold standard for detecting H. pylori, its performance relies on a number of issues, including the site, number and size of gastric biopsies, method of staining, and the level of experience of the examining pathologist. Culture is a highly specific test for H. pylori that also allows characterization of antimicrobial sensitivities. However, it is not as sensitive as histology or rapid urease testing.
18
Q

non-endoscopic tests for H. pylori

A
  • Serologic testing for IgG antibodies to H. pylori is often used to detect infection and has an overall sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 79%, respectively. This test has little value in confirming eradication of the infection, because the antibodies persist for many months, if not longer, after eradication
  • The urea breath test involves drinking 13C-labeled or 14C-labeled urea, which is converted to labeled carbon dioxide by the urease in H. pylori. The labeled gas is measured in a breath sample. The test has a sensitivity and a specificity of 95%
  • The infection can also be detected by identifying H. pylori–specific antigens in a stool sample with the use of polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies (the fecal antigen test). The monoclonal-antibody test (which also has a specificity and a sensitivity of 95%) is more accurate than the polyclonal-antibody test
  • For both the breath test and the fecal antigen test, the patient should stop taking proton-pump inhibitors 2 weeks before testing, should stop taking H2 receptor antagonists for 24 hours before testing, and should avoid taking antimicrobial agents for 4 weeks before testing, since these medications may suppress the infection and reduce the sensitivity of testing
  • With regard to resources and personnel required to perform a test, please refer to the instructions for use for the individual products. The 14C-labeled urea test requires extra care because it is radioactive, which is not the case with 13C-labeled urea test
19
Q

serology testing for H. pylori

A
  • Widely available
  • (Relatively) inexpensive
  • IgG most accurate (IgA or IgM rarely, if ever, indicated)
  • The advantages of serologic tests for antibodies to H. pylori include their low cost, widespread availability, and ability to provide rapid results. As shown (left), a meta-analysis of several commercially available quantitative serologic assays found their overall sensitivity and specificity to be 85% and 79%, respectively. However, these tests are of little benefit in confirming eradication as results can remain positive for years after successful cure of the infection.
20
Q

drawbacks of serologic testing

A
  • False negatives until a patient mounts an immune response (eg, up to weeks/months in children)1
  • False positives after eradication of H. pylori1,2 (At 6 months post-infection, antibody titer can still be 50% of what it was during infection, In some cases, serologic testing can remain positive for years (thus low specificity), “Antibody tests are of little benefit in documenting eradication…”3)
  • Let’s review a few additional drawbacks associated with serologic testing
  • Because serology relies on the presence of antibodies, testing will not be positive until the patient has mounted an immune response. In children, this can take up to several months
  • Because serology assesses the presence of antibodies and is not a test of active infection, a positive result can persist despite successful eradication (ie, false positives)
  • Antibody titers can take months, and in rare cases, years, to “turn” negative
  • Given these drawbacks, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) indicates that “antibody tests are of little benefit in documenting eradication”
21
Q

ACG Guidelines do not recommend broad use of serology

A
  • In populations with a low pretest probability of H. pylori infection, active tests (UBT and fecal antigen) test offer superior PPV compared with antibody tests
  • Test of active infection is recommended for post treatment eradication testing
  • Avoid serologic testing in the post-treatment setting
  • One could debate the utility of an index (single) Ab test for diagnosis (negative perhaps useful) but no indication for a second serology in almost any clinical situation
  • The ACG guidelines go on to detail the recommended role of serologic testing in the context of other available testing methods
  • Read as stated.
22
Q

active testing: stool H. pylori antigen

A
  • Useful before and after treatment
  • Process of stool collection and transport may be problematic (and requires refrigeration (if >24 hours))
  • False negative results possible in the presence of PPIs or with recent use of antibiotics or bismuth preparation
  • Stool antigen tests identify H. pylori antigen in the stool by enzyme immunoassay with the use of polyclonal or monoclonal anti‒H. pylori antibodies. Data from 19 studies conducted in 1999 and 2000 involving 2924 patients indicate a pre-treatment sensitivity and specificity of 93% for H. pylori stool antigen tests (shown at left). Although these tests are simple and easy to perform, the unpleasantness of handling and storing stool have slowed its widespread use. Further, similar to the UBT, the sensitivity of the stool antigen test is affected by the recent use of bismuth compounds, antibiotics, and PPIs.
23
Q

active testing: urea breath test

A
  • Useful before and after treatment3
  • Resources and personnel may be required to perform test3
  • False negative results possible in the presence of PPIs or with recent use of antibiotics or bismuth preparations
  • The urea breath test (UBT) identifies active H. pylori infection by detecting the organism’s urease activity. The UBT has excellent positive and negative predictive value, with sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 90%, respectively for initial diagnosis in adult patients. The UBT is a useful means of post-treatment testing, but like the stool antigen test, its sensitivity is decreased by medications that reduce organism density or urease activity, such as bismuth-containing compounds, antibiotics, and PPIs. Further, considerable resources and personnel may be required in order to perform the test.
24
Q

guidelines for H. pylori treatment

A
  • This slide quickly recaps the current first-line treatment recommendations
  • Both the World Gastroenterology Organisation guidelines and the ACG guidelines in the United States recommend the following first-line treatment regimens for H. pylori infection:
  • 1) a clarithromycin-based triple therapy containing a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) + clarithromycin + (amoxicillin or metronidazole) for 14 days, or
  • 2) a bismuth quadruple therapy containing a PPI or H2RA + bismuth + metronidazole + tetracycline for 10–14 days1,2
25
Q

eradication rates of triple and quad rx

A
  • In 2013, Venerito and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and tolerability of bismuth quadruple therapy vs clarithromycin triple therapy as first-line treatment for H. pylori
  • Their inclusion criteria netted 12 studies, all conducted between 2000 and 2011
  • Overall, bismuth quadruple therapy resulted in H. pylori eradication in 77.6% of patients, while the eradication rate with clarithromycin triple therapy was 68.9%. This difference was not significant
  • Similar eradication rates were seen when either regimen were given for 7 or 10 days
  • It is worth noting that even in the context of well-designed randomized controlled trials, the eradication rates still averaged below 78%
26
Q

other salvage Rx option

A
  • Rifabutin triple regimen (PPI, amoxicillin, rifabutin 10 days)
  • High-dose dual therapy (PPI and amoxicillin for 14 days)
  • Concomitant therapy (PPI, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and a nitroimidazole for 10–14 days)
  • Sequential therapy (PPI and amoxicillin for 5–7 days followed by PPI, clarithromycin, and a nitroimidazole for 5–7 days)
  • Hybrid therapy (PPI and amoxicillin for 7 days followed by PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole for 7)
  • Levofloxacin triple therapy (PPI, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin for 10–14 days)
  • Fluoroquinolone sequential therapy (PPI and amoxicillin for 5–7 days followed by a PPI, fluoroquinolone, and nitroimidazole for 5–7 days)
27
Q

post treatment testing

A

-ACG guidelines (2017): “Whenever Hp infection is treated, testing to prove eradication should be performed using a urea breath test (active test), fecal antigen test or biopsy based testing >4 weeks after Abx Rx and after PPI therapy has been withheld for 2 weeks”
-ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN Guidelines (2011) - “Even when children become asymptomatic after treatment, it is recommended that the success of treatment…..be evaluated. The absence of symptoms does not necessarily mean the infection
has been eradicated”
-Because symptoms may not be a reliable indication of persistent infection/eradication, post-treatment testing to confirm eradication is important. Several practice guidelines recommend post-treatment testing to confirm eradication of H. pylori.1-4