GSWS 100 good porn bad porn Flashcards
1
Q
what are objectives?
A
- to understand how pornography functions as a category, as a form of knowledge/power
- analyze how claims of pornification function as a moral discourse and investigate underlying assumptions
- examine what might be missing amidst the panic over pornification and what may be used to find out
2
Q
the study of sex and the media - Rubin’s charmed circle
A
- portrays how modern sexual norms are categorized as good/bad
- this boundary is fought over in media
- the study of sex and media is controversial
- no real consensus of what is right
3
Q
what are critical approaches to porn?
Pre 1990s
A
- based on conventional assumptions about what makes up healthy/good/normal sexual practices
- focus more on the harms of porn
- leave out evidence based on how porm is actually consumed, not really researched at all
- caught in a moral debate rather than research (should/shouldnt/ rather than what/how)
4
Q
critical approaches to porn
Post 1990s = the emergence of porn studies
A
- now specific genre with own language and conventions - LINDA WILLIAMS
- focus on use of sex media by specific groups (young people, LGBTQ, women) and what porn means to them
- impact of new media technology on the access and availability of porn and on new possibilities of sexual interaction.
5
Q
Takeaway
A
- as a concept “pornography” serves to regulate what sexual images should/shouldn’t be seen in public
- study in last 30yrs - change from focus on its harm yo complex approaches that examine language of porn, its uses by specific groups, and impact of media technology on its access and availability
6
Q
what is porn?
A
- “ill know it when I see it”
- “pornographic” as a concept refers to different things depending on community standards and social contexts
7
Q
what are the functions of the “pornographic” as a category?
A
- to distinguish the normative form illicit
- designate and regulate the boundary dividing il/legitimate sexual representations
- porn/not porn = normal, respectable, publicly visible sexual images vs. illicit/shameful images that are supposed to remain private
8
Q
unseeing porn
A
- porn/art: artwork that creatively explore the ambivalent boundary between porn/not porn
- porn/comedy: comedic creative projects that celebrate the creative labour in making porn
9
Q
the mainstreaming of porn aesthetics
A
- changes in media distribution: liberalization of adult content at night, paid channels - major companies no longer for regulating this content
- HBO sex and the city
- images and society is more sexualized - ads, fashion labels and brands
- NOW there is a blur of what is public/private sexuality and development of media technology
10
Q
takeaway
A
- difficult to define porm
- artists’ creativity, changes in mainstream genres’ sexual content, more sexual visibility in public spaces, new media tech —> all expose how the boundary between what is deemed as pornographic has changed - not easy to define it anymore because ppl can claim their work to be something else
11
Q
The moral discourse of pornification
A
- age of “onscenity” –> coined by Linda Williams
it describes a culture that makes previously defined images as unacceptable or private into a norm or public images now - sexualization of media early on - more public discussion on sex
- these concerns - DISCOURSE (form of power/knowledge) attempts to control the shifting boundaries of normative/illicit
- such concerns - intensified during technological changes and major shifts in boundaries between normative/illicit
- current fears are directed at online/mobile/social media and their impacts on young people
12
Q
what does the current discourse of pornification emphasize?
A
- the pedophile gaze - fear of young individuals from being sexualized early on and catching the attention from harmful individuals
- how easy it is to access everything on media especially sexual content online for younger people
- sexually objectifying people, creating a norm of how a women is supposed to look and act
13
Q
what or who is usually missing in the discourse of pornification?
A
- the input of young people
- knowledge of how younger people negotiate changing dynamics of sexual culture through tech
- how young people produce “counter discourse”
- new possibilities for positive and consensual sexual interaction made possible by technological changes
14
Q
takeaway
A
- concerns on sexualization of media - intensify when technological changes blur the boundary between normative and illicit representations of sex
- current discourse about pornification is mainly concerned about online and social media
- focus on how media causes harm - gaps in knowledge about young people’s sexual agency and new possibilities for positive, consensual sexual interactions