Group Teaching - BPH and Prostate Cancer Flashcards

1
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

What is your differential diagnosis?

A
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bowel Cancer
  • Prostate hyperplasia (BPH / Cancer / Prostatitis)
  • Parasympathetic nerve damage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

Which diagnostic tests should he be referred for?

A
  • Cycstoscopy
  • CT scan
  • Creatinine
  • MRI scan
  • Repeat PSA
  • US kidney
  • Urinary flow rate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

Following results obtained:
* Multiparametric MRI – reported a homogenous circumscribed nodule in the transition zone of the prostate.
* The patient subsequently underwent trans perineal template prostate biopsies and this demonstrated one core of Gleason 3+3 (1mm) (in the region of the index lesion) and all other biopsies demonstrated BPH only.

What can you infer from these results?

A

Well differentiated prostate cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

Following results obtained:
* Multiparametric MRI – reported a homogenous circumscribed nodule in the transition zone of the prostate.
* The patient subsequently underwent trans perineal template prostate biopsies and this demonstrated one core of Gleason 3+3 (1mm) (in the region of the index lesion) and all other biopsies demonstrated BPH only.

What treatment and management plan should be followed?

A
  • Active surveillance (regular PSA, MRI and Bx)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

Following results obtained:
* Multiparametric MRI – reported a homogenous circumscribed nodule in the transition zone of the prostate.
* The patient subsequently underwent trans perineal template prostate biopsies and this demonstrated one core of Gleason 3+3 (1mm) (in the region of the index lesion) and all other biopsies demonstrated BPH only.

After 2 years, following results obtained:
* PSA Test – 8
* MRI result – new bilateral lesions in peripheral zone of the prostate
* Biopsy test – Gleason score – 4+3 in several cores bilaterally

What is your inference from analysing these results?

A
  • Cancer has progressed, now moderately differentiated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

Following results obtained:
* Multiparametric MRI – reported a homogenous circumscribed nodule in the transition zone of the prostate.
* The patient subsequently underwent trans perineal template prostate biopsies and this demonstrated one core of Gleason 3+3 (1mm) (in the region of the index lesion) and all other biopsies demonstrated BPH only.

After 2 years, following results obtained:
* PSA Test – 8
* MRI result – new bilateral lesions in peripheral zone of the prostate
* Biopsy test – Gleason score – 4+3 in several cores bilaterally

What is your inference from analysing these results?

A
  • Radical prostatectomy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

Following results obtained:
* Multiparametric MRI – reported a homogenous circumscribed nodule in the transition zone of the prostate.
* The patient subsequently underwent trans perineal template prostate biopsies and this demonstrated one core of Gleason 3+3 (1mm) (in the region of the index lesion) and all other biopsies demonstrated BPH only.

After 2 years, following results obtained:
* PSA Test – 8
* MRI result – new bilateral lesions in peripheral zone of the prostate
* Biopsy test – Gleason score – 4+3 in several cores bilaterally

The patient decides on a radical prostatectomy and following surgery develops both erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence.

What is the mechanisms of these post operative complications and how should they be treated?

A
  • Damage to the proximal urethral sphincter and change in urethral length -> urinary incontinece
  • Damage to the cavernous nerves -> ED
  • Tx:
    • Pelvic floor muscle exercises
      • Artificial urinary sphincter device if exercises fail
    • Viagra, or prostaglandin E1 and if insufficient - penile prosthesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • Patient – Mr Smith, 65-years old
  • Presenting symptoms – hesitancy, poor flow, sensation of incomplete emptying. Long standing but symptoms suddenly worsened with episode of constipation.
  • Past medical history - Hypertension
  • Drug History – Amlodipine
  • Social History – Regular smoker, occasional drinking
  • Examination – BP 160/95, no swelling of ankles, Chest clear, HS I + II + 0, abdomen soft and non-tender. No palpable bladder. DRE- smooth 30g prostate. Stool in the rectum.
  • Investigation – dipstick- nitrate negative, leucocyte negative, blood negative, blood tests – PSA 5, renal function normal.

Following results obtained:
* Multiparametric MRI – reported a homogenous circumscribed nodule in the transition zone of the prostate.
* The patient subsequently underwent trans perineal template prostate biopsies and this demonstrated one core of Gleason 3+3 (1mm) (in the region of the index lesion) and all other biopsies demonstrated BPH only.

After 2 years, following results obtained:
* PSA Test – 8
* MRI result – new bilateral lesions in peripheral zone of the prostate
* Biopsy test – Gleason score – 4+3 in several cores bilaterally

The patient decides on a radical prostatectomy and following surgery develops both erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence.

What post operative follow up should the patient undergo?

A

Regular PSA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly