Group interviews Flashcards
1
Q
What is a group interview?
A
A structured or unstructured interview with more than 1 interviewee
2
Q
KEY STUDY: Willis (1977)
A
“Learning to Labour”. Group interviews and non-participant observations with 12 working class ‘lads’ who created an anti-school subculture. Willis believed they were working class heroes who were going against capitalist ideas
3
Q
What are some practical strengths of group interviews?
A
- Less time consuming than other interviews as you can interview multiple people at once
- Subject matter; can be a useful way of generating initial ideas which can be followed up in later research
4
Q
What are some practical weaknesses of group interviews?
A
- Data can take a long time to analyse as the group interactions are more complex
- Large groups can be difficult to control and manage
- Researcher may struggle to keep the group focussed on the discussion topic
5
Q
What are some ethical strengths of group interviews?
A
- Informed consent is gained, as interviewees do not have to take part if they don’t want to
- Can be used to observe group dynamics and norms
- Suitable for use with pupils (methods in context) as it creates a safe peer environment which they are used to from school
6
Q
What are some ethical weaknesses of group interviews?
A
- Can be uncomfortable for some interviewees being in a group dynamic, especially for sensitive issues
- Interviewees may feel unable to withdraw from the interview or certain questions due to the group dynamics
7
Q
What are some theoretical strengths of group interviews?
A
- Interpretivists like them as they collect qualitative data, and you can build rapport/verstehen with participants
- Flexible as you do not have to stick to a script
- Participants may be more comfortable speaking around others, increasing validity
- Participants can stimulate each others’ thinking/give each other ideas, increasing validity
- Includes more people, increasing representativeness
8
Q
What are some theoretical weaknesses of group interviews?
A
- Positivists dislike them as they are impossible to repeat exactly (low reliability)
- Hawthorne effect; participants may change behaviour because of the researcher AND the other participants (peer pressure)
- Some participants may dominate the discussion, stopping others from talking (reducing validity)
- May not be representative as not all interviewees may contribute