group interview Flashcards
case study
paul willis
paul wills
Willis used group interviews and non-participant observations to allow him to obtain a wealth of information in a relatively small amount of time.
Neo-Marxist approach – wanted to know what impact their WC background had on their educational progress but did this on a micro scale using qualitative methods.
The transcripts showed Willis had encouraged respondents to talk and largely prevented himself from talking.
group interview practical advantage
· Less time consuming than other interviews. · Subject Matter – group interviews can be a useful way of generating initial ideas, this can then be followed up in later research.
group interview practical disadvantage
Long time to analyse data - Data generated from group interactions are more complex and difficult to analyse, which can take a long time. · A large group may be more difficult to control and manage, especially if there are some loud characters. · The researcher may struggle to keep the group focussed on the discussion topic.
group interview ethical advantage
· Informed consent is gained by attending the interview. · The researcher can combine questioning with the opportunity to observe group dynamics & norms. · This makes it suitable for use with pupils because it creates a safe peer environment, and they reproduce the small group settings that young people are familiar with in classroom work.
group interview ethical disadvantage
Can be uncomfortable for interviewees, especially when discussing sensitive issues. Interviewees may not want to discuss these issues face to face, especially in front of others. · Interviewees may feel like they are unable to withdraw from the interview, or not answer a particular question due to the group dynamic. · Peer group pressure may lead some to feel unsafe in discussing sensitive topics and stop them from withdrawing from the interview.
group interview ethical advantage
· Interpretivists favour as you can build a rapport which means you can gain verstehen. · Do not have to stick to a script during the interview, therefore interviewees and the interviewer can both ask for clarification of answers. · Flexibility to explore new areas - allows for more in-depth answers. · Qualitative data – detailed word-based data. · Participants may feel more comfortable being with others and are therefore more likely to open up, giving real in-depth data. · In a discussion, participants throw ideas around the group, stimulating each other’s thinking. This produces richer & more reflective data (validity).
group interview ethical disadvantage
· Positivists dislike this method. · This can be due to the Hawthorne effect – where interviewees may change their behaviour due to the group dynamics & peer pressure. · Peer group pressure may lead to participants not saying what they really think. · One or two individuals may dominate the discussions, inhibiting others from contributing. · The data may not be representative as not all interviewees may contribute or may not contribute honestly.