Grounds to Contest Will Flashcards
Typical Grounds to Contest Will
- Invalid Formation
- Insane Delusion
- Undue Influence
- Fraud
- Mistake in Execution
- Mistake in Inducement
Insane Delusion
- Testator had a false belief
- That belief was the product of a sick mind
- That sick mind affected some part of the will
- There is no evidence at all that the belief is true
Fraud
- Representation of a material fact
- Known to be false by the wrongdoer
- Made for the purpose of inducing action
- That actually does induce action
Fraud in the Execution vs. Fraud in the Inducement
Fraud in the execution: renders an entire will invalid–> tricking the testator into signing something that turns out to be his well
Fraud in the inducement: only the part of the will that the fraud procured
Types of Undue Influence
- Prima Facie Case
- Presumption of Undue Influence
- Statutory Undue Influence
Prima Facie Undue Influence
Court considers circumstantial evidence of the following factors:
- Testator has some suscepitibility
- There is opportunity to take advantage of it
- Active Participation by the other person in procuring the will
- Disposition of the will at odds with expressed intention of the testator
- Unnatural Result of a devise to you or someone close to you
Presumptive Undue Influence
- Confidential Relationship
- Active Participation
- Unnatural Result
- Not Rebutted by Clear and Convincing Evidence
Statutory Undue Influence
Rule: If the following receives a gift and is not “kindred”:
1. Drafter (conclusive)
2. Fiduciary (Presumptive)
3. Caretaker relationship that with no prior personal relationship before incapacitation (Presumptive)
4. Spouse or Blood Relative or Employee of any of the above (Presumptive)
Order of Abatement to Contest Testator’s Debts
- Intestacy
- Residue
- General Gift (non relatives first)
- Specific Gift (non relatives first)
General Rule of Undue Influence
To establish undue influence, the contestant has the burden of proof to show that:
1. Influence was exerted on the testator
2. The effect of the influence was to overpower the mind and free will of the testator
3. No will would have been executed but for the influence
Proving Undue Influence
Usually proven by circumstantial evidence –> see factors for prima facie case
Unnatural Result of Will
Favors a stranger over the natural objects of a testator’s bounty