Gross Negligent Manslaughter [Fatal Offences] Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is GNM?

A

GNM is an offence in which D causes the death of the victim by behaving in a negligent way by an act or omission (Adomako).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the FIRST element?

A

A DOC from D to victim must first be established. The concept of a DOC was first seen in Donoghue v Stevenson and says ‘you must take care to avoid acts or omissions that you can reasonably foresee may injure your neighbour’, with a neighbour being someone affected by your actions.

In the case of Robinson, it was established that if a case deals with a DOC that already exists, the three part Caparo test need not be used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some examples of DOCs? (Doctor, Parent, Driver and CoDS)

A
  • Doctor to Patient (Adomako)
  • Parent to Child (Harris and Harris)
  • Driver to Passenger (Wacker)
  • Creation of a dangerous situation (Evans)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the SECOND element?

A

It must be established that the DOC has been breached. As set out in Blyth v Birmingham Water Works, ‘a D breaches a DOC when they fall below the standard of a reasonable person doing the same job’.

It must be noted that learners are compared to the qualified (Nettleship v Weston), professionals are compared to professionals (Bolam v Friern Barnet Hospital), children are compared to children of a similar age (Mullins v Richards) and in regards to a level of skill, an ordinary person is compared to an ordinary person (Wells v Cooper)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What must be mentioned AFTER the SECOND element?

A

Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the THIRD element?

A

It must be proved that D’s actions were grossly negligent. The rule on this was set out in R v Bateman as ‘[the conduct] goes beyond a mere matter of compensation and showed such disregard for the life and safety of others as to amount to a crime and criminal punishment’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the FOURTH element?

A

Lastly, there must have been a clear risk of death from the actions of D (Misra)(Rudling).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the maximum sentence?

A

18 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the FIFTH element?

A

The Reasonable Person must have been able to foresee a clear risk of death, not just of injury (Broughton).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly