Gross negligent manslaughter Flashcards

1
Q

what were the 6 rules set our by r v broughton

A

1- must owe a duty of care
2- breach of duty
3-serious and obvious risk of death
4-reasonably foreseeable
5- significant contribute to death
6- breach justifies criminal sanction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the first point of GNM

A

must owe a duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Ademako

A

Owed a duty of care for patient as doctor but failed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v wacker

A

owed a duty of care , coudnt rely on joint agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v kuddas

A

owed a duty of care to the customer knew about the party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the second point of GNM

A

breach of duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v warner

A

breached his duty of care to the customer failure to replace barrier , was irresponsible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the third and fourth point of GNM

A

3- serious and obvious risk of death
4- foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

r v rose

A

risk of death needs to be obvious one that can be found under further investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Misra and srivastava

A

forseeable of time as breach created a risk of death , lack of procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the fith point of GNM

A

breach and causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is needed for causation

A

factual and legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

case for factual causation

A

R v white- but for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

legal causation

A

operative cause- r v smith
intervening event- r v pagget
think skull test- take victim as u find them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is point 6

A

breach is so grossly negloigent it warrant criminal conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Bateman

A

disregard for the life and safety of others

17
Q

reasonable persons test

A

are they reaosably person, is there conduct reasoable person

18
Q

A-G reference 2000

A

conduct has been signficantly to justify criminal liabillity, not essential to know what there thiknin