Gross negligence manslaughter Flashcards

1
Q

Which case outlines the elements for GNM?

A

Adomako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 4 elements of GNM?

A

1) Duty of care
2) Breach of duty involving a risk of death
3) Breach caused death
4) Gross negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Through what 2 ways can a duty be proved?

A

Through by duty of care or if there is an omission and a duty to act arises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which case outlines the 3 part test for a duty of care?

A

Caparo v Dickman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Caparo 3 part test?

A

1) Damage must be reasonably foreseeable
2) Proximity between D and V
3) Fair, just and reasonable to impose duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which case demonstrates that damage must be reasonably foreseeable?

A

Jolley v Sutton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case demonstrates there must be proximity between D and V?

A

Relationship - Osman v Ferguson

Time and space - Bourhill v Young

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case demonstrates that it must be fair, just and reasonable to impose duty?

A

Hill v South Yorkshire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 5 types of duty?

A
Contractual - Pittwood
Relationship - Gibbons and Proctor
Voluntary assumption of care - Stone and Dobinson
Public office - Dytham 
Creating a dangerous situation - Miller
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does a breach of duty mean?

A

That D has fallen bellow the standard pf car expected of a reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which case defines a breach of duty?

A

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks co.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Blyth define breach of duty?

A

D does not do something that a reasonable man would do or does something that a reasonable man wouldn’t do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What legal principle does Nettleship v Weston outline?

A

Inexperience does not lower the standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What legal principle does Bolam v Barnet & Friern outline?

A

Professionals will be compared to another reasonable professional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What legal principle does Mullins v Richards outline?

A

Age can lower standard of care expected (children will be compared to a reasonable child of the same age)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What can be used to help prove breach?

A

Risk factors

17
Q

What are the 4 risk factors?

A

1) Size of risk
2) Seriousness of potential harm
3) Practicability of precautions
4) Potential benefits of taking risk

18
Q

What is the leading case which demonstrates a small risk of harm?

A

Bolton v Stone

19
Q

What is the leading case which demonstrates a large risk of harm?

A

Miller v Jackson

20
Q

What is the leading case which demonstrates seriousness of potential harm?

A

Paris v Stepney BC

21
Q

What is the leading case which demonstrates practicability of precautions?

A

Latimer v AEC and Paris v Stepney

22
Q

What is the leading case which demonstrates the potential benefits of taking risk?

A

Watt v Hertfordshire CC

23
Q

The breach must involve what?

A

A risk of death

24
Q

Who must foresee the risk of death?

A

Reasonable man

25
Which case says that the reasonable man must foresee the risk of death?
Lewin v CPS
26
It must be proved that the breach caused the death, so what must be shown?
That the breach factually and legally caused the death
27
Which case outlines the gross negligence?
Adomako
28
What did Adomako stress about the matter of gross negligence?
That it was a matter for the jury to decide
29
What is the gross negligence test/what do the jury need to decide?
Whether D's conduct is so bad, departed so far from the standard expected as to amount to a criminal act or omission