Gross Negligence Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define

A

The unlawful killing where D does not have the intention to kill or cause serious bodily harm, however they die due to D’s negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sentencing

A

Discretionary (life in prison)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rules of GNM

A

(Adomako)
Degree of negligence must be sufficiently serious as to make D criminally liable for the death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duty of care (1/5)

A

Assumed responsibility (Stone v Dobinson) - failed to take care and summon help for ill family.

Contractual duty (R v Pitwood) - master of ship crashed - owed duty to crew members

Landlord and tennant (Singh) - took no action against carbon monoxide

During crime (Wacker) - illegal immigrants suffocated in lorry.

Crime (Willoughby) - set fire for insurance

Summoning help (Evans) - failed to call an ambulance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AR (2/5) breach of duty

A

Once a duty has been established, the defendant must have failed the duty to care for the victim.

Tested on how a reasonable man would have responded in that situation (R v Holloway).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AR (3/5) Risk of death

A

Has to be an obvious risk of death not just a risk of harm (R v Rose).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AR (4/5) Causation

A

Normal rules of causation apply.
Factual
Legal
Thin skull

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AR (5/5) Gross Negligence

A

Must fall below the standards of a reasonable man. It must be so “gross” that it is considered criminal.

(R v Bateman) “such disregard for the life and safety of others”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MR

A

Defendant does not intent to kill or cause serious harm.

Criminality is judged objectively - assessment of D’s recklessness could be made by the jury to evaluate badness of the breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly