Greek Religion Scholarship 2 Flashcards
Redfield on the gods in Homer
“chief source of comedy” in the Iliad
Griffin on Homeric gods
Homer’s epics are full of really impressive gods who deserve the worship they receive
Allan on the morality of the gods
the gods are not portrayed as being amoral, but instead offer divine justice
Sowerby on the gods’ morality
the gods are characteristically amoral
Haynes on the gods
“I think that Greek gods are capricious and destructive because they are connected with the natural world which can often be the same”
Haynes on the reason for worship
“people might experience love or devotion… they may simply have been acknowledging a figure who had power over them… because of fear or social obligation”
Haynes on statues
“for the Greeks, statues are both representations of gods but also sort of manifestations of gods”
Parker on the variety of gods
“gods overflowed like clothes from an overfilled drawer which no one felt obliged to tidy”
Parker on the idea of gods in people’s heads
“the gods were… silhouettes; one could fill in the details according to one’s taste”
Scott on reciprocity
“they could be for you or against you, so you had to do your utmost to ensure that they were on your side”
Garland on reciprocity
the gods would only grant your request if it didn’t conflict with their will
Parker on reciprocity
“the ideal is to establish a cycle of favour and counter-favour between self and god that will continue indefinitely”
Aston on sacrifice
the point was to give something of economic and social value to you
Aston on temples
the temple is where you go to achieve communication and contact with the gods
Kindt on private vs public
ancient Greek has no terms for public or private
Kindt on the links between different types of religion
- key institutions of ancient Greek religion are the stuff of polis as well as of personal religion.
- Personal religion mapped onto the religions of the family and the household, which in turn mapped onto the religion of the city.
Kindt on Eleusis
“an individual engagement with the supernatural that nevertheless draws on a larger public (communal) context”
Zaidman and Pantel on the Eleusinian mysteries (2)
- The community of initiates was “united by its shared experience”
- “initiation in the mysteries… was rather a process of internal transformation, founded upon the emotional experience of a direct encounter with the divine”
Seaford on the Eleusinian mysteries
the point was to remove the fear of death
Critchley on the Eleusinian mysteries
“egalitarian ritual”
Garland on the Eleusinian mysteries
“we have to admit our ignorance” about the Eleusinian mysteries
Zaidman and Pantel on Epidauros/healing cults
Epidauros “was important not primarily because from time to time people were cured, but because it enabled the sick to go on hoping”
Bonnecherre on healing cults
the list of miracles invites us to accept the reality of psychosomatic cures
Parikh on anatomical votives
“[anatomical votives] represent not only the process of healing, but also the process of communicating with a god”
Burkert on sacrifice (2)
- sacrifice is an emotional experience
- communal sacrifice can reaffirm the solidarity of mortals of any gender or class
Burkert on sacrifice and anthromorphism
sacrifice doesn’t fit with the anthropomorphic nature of the gods bc they don’t get the nice bit
Detienne and Verdant on sacrifice
sacrifice was fundamentally killing for feeding a population who otherwise had little meat in their diet
Garland on sacrifice (2)
- the gods were thought to derive pleasure from the smoke from a sacrifice
- while the meal was important, this doesn’t take away from how it creates intimacy between mortal and immortal and had an important religious aspect
Garland on votive offerings
votive offerings were a way of seeking to ensure what had happened in the past would happen in the future