Grant et al Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Environmental context-dependency effects

A

suggests some aspects of the environment during learning are stored or ‘encoded’ with the to-be-remembered item and become part of the ‘memory trace’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

cue dependency

A

the idea that when a to-be-remembered item is stored, other pieces of info present at the time are stored with it. These extra pieces of info from the environment (context) or even persons state can later act as cues to aid recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

recall

A

accessing memories with very few prompts such as when writing an essay you have a lot to remember with only a short title to help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

recognition

A

when we have to decide which of 2 or more items we have seen before such as when you answer a multiple choice question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

meaningful items

A

understandable and we relate to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the aim of this study?

A
  • To investigate whether environmental context (EC) cues are important when remembering newly learned info.
  • To see whether info is remembered better in a matching or mis matching environment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what research method was used?

A

lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what experimental deisgn was used?

A

independent measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the sample?

A

8 experimenters recruited 5 ps through opportunity sampling. 40 ps provided. Aged 17-56,
17 males, 22 females
(1 excluded= 39 as scores were v different)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the IV?

A

whether the study and test conditions were matching or mismatching.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was the DV?

A

the ps performance on a short answer and multiple choice test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what made the noisy background?

A

it was created by people talking at lunchtime in a uni cafeteria. (ps wore headphones provided by experimenter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the material to be studied on?

A

2 page article on psychoimmunology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how long did ps get to break between reading the article and recall?

A

2 minute break (to minimise info recalled from short-term memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how many short answer questions were the ps given?

A

10 short answer questions (given first)
required single word or phrase as answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how many multiple choice questions were ps given?

A

16 multiple choice questions- each consisting of a stem & 4 alternative answers.

17
Q

Reading the article

A

Ps asked to read once as if they were for an assignment, highlighting and/or underlining not allowed.
Experimenter noted time taken for ps to read.
When finished reading, 2 min break minimising recall from short term memory.

18
Q

tests of recall

A

designed to be similar to class tests, they assessed comprehension of new material rather than exact recall of facts.

19
Q

which test was always given first and why?

A

Short answers test, this ensures recall of info from article was tested and not just recall of info from multiple choice test.

20
Q

were ps debriefed?

A

yes- told the purpose of the experiment.

21
Q

how long did entire procedure last?

A

30 mins

22
Q

Reading time

A

analysis of time taken to read article across all 4 conditions did not show any significant difference. Results suggest ps spent roughly equal amounts of time reading.

23
Q

what 2 conclusions did grant draw from this study?

A

1) there was NO independent effect of noise on performance, the claim made by many students that noise does NOT affect their capacity to study is supported.

2) results showed there ARE environmental context dependency (EC) effects for meaningful to-be-remembered info regardless of whether short answer test/multiple choice test used to asses recall.
For BOTH test types MATCHING conditions was more beneficial.

24
Q

which test did ps perform better on?

A

multiple choice (better on a test of recognition than recall)

25
Q

which conditions did ps get higher test scores?

A

2 matching conditions, i.e noisy study & noisy test, silent study & silent test

26
Q

did noise have an affect on performance?

A

NO overall effect of noise on performance.

27
Q
A