Gould: Measuring Differences (Individual Differences) Flashcards

1
Q

What background was there to Gould’s study?

A
  • A key issue related to intelligence is one of nature vs. nurture
  • Yerkes was a psychologist at Harvard who wanted to show that intelligence could be reliable and valid
  • The outbreak of WW1 gave him the opportunity to use recruits for the American army as a source of sufficient data to show that intelligence testing was scientific
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What method does Gould’s study use?

A
  • Review article
  • Looked at the history of Yerkes’s intelligence testing of recruits in his attempt to establish psychology as a scientific discipline
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the sample of Gould’s study?

A
  • 1.75 million recruits in the US during WW1
  • This included white Americans, black Americans, and European immigrants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the 3 different tests Yerkes carried out?

A
  • Army alpha Test
  • Army beta Test
  • Individual spoken examination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the Army alpha test?

A
  • Designed for literate recruits
  • Consisted of 8 parts and included items expected in an intelligence test (analogies, filling in the next number)
  • Required a good basic understanding of the English language
  • Numerous questions on American culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the Army Beta Test?

A
  • Designed for people who were illiterate or failed the army alpha test
  • Seven parts and consisted of picture completion
  • Pictures were culturally specific
  • Instructions were in English and some answers had to be given in writing despite it being a test for the illiterate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the Individual Spoken Examination?

A
  • Done if recruits failed the other two tests, however it was rarely carried out
  • 1/5 of those who failed the Beta Test were allowed to take the individual examination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How were recruits graded by Yerkes?

A

Given grades from A to E with plus and minus signs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did administration of the tests cause problems?

A
  • Illiterate recruits should have been given the beta test but many were only given the alpha test
  • Literacy was much lower than Yerkes anticipated
  • Queues for the beta test led to more doing the alpha test and lower minimum requirements to do the alpha test
  • Many of those who failed the alpha test were not given the beta test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the finding’s of Yerkes’s study?

A
  • Average mental age of white American male adults was 13, indicating the country was ‘a nation of morons’
  • People with darker skin (such as Southern Europeans and the Slavs of Eastern Europe) were less intelligent than those with lighter skin
  • Average mental age of black men was 10.4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the impact of Yerkes’s findings?

A
  • By the end of WW1, 2/3 of the men who had been promoted in the army were those who had done well in the test
  • Used as propaganda by racists
  • Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 used quotas to restrict how many immigrants could enter the country
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What conclusions did Gould draw?

A
  • IQ tests are culturally and historically biased
  • IQ tests do not measure innate intelligence
  • IQ testing is often unreliable
  • IQ tests may not produce valid results
  • Inappropriate, poorly administered IQ tests can lead to tragic consequences
  • America is a nation of morons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of research methods used in Gould’s study?

A
  • Review article gives a different perspective, changing information
  • Yerkes’s study is self report
  • Yerkes used a quasi experiment with the IV as ethnic origin and the DV as the mental age of recruits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of different types of data used in Gould’s study?

A
  • Yerkes was only quantifiable so analysis was easy to do
  • Comparison between conditions
  • Gould adds qualitative data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What ethical considerations are there in Gould’s study?

A
  • Socially sensitive so could cause harm (being called a moron, racism)
  • Consented to army but weren’t told about the exam or its purposes
  • Felt they couldn’t withdraw
  • Anonymous to public but names, ages, and education were recorded
  • Not treated with respect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can Yerkes’s study be considered valid?

A
  • No because the tests (with American culture and English language) wasn’t an actual test of intelligence
  • Attempted standardisation of different levels
17
Q

Can Yerkes’s study be considered reliable?

A
  • Mental tests were standardised and detailed mark scheme
  • Different timings at different camps
  • Different camps had different rules for doing the beta test first
18
Q

Was there any sampling bias in Yerkes’s study?

A
  • Large sample - 1.75 million
  • Androcentric
  • All military recruits
19
Q

Can Yerkes’s study be considered ethnocentric?

A
  • Wide range of ethnicities so no
  • But the test used American culture and English language
20
Q

What practical applications are there of Gould’s study?

A
  • IQ tests have been amended and have applications in schools in identifying those who need additional support or to be challenged further
  • Gould suggests the study should teach psychologists to exercise scepticism around attempts at measuring intelligence