Good Vs Evil

Question 1

Justice for those unfairly harmed

Answer 1

Narrator (Moral ambiguity)
Analysis: This quote introduces the Whatsitsname’s initial motivation, which seems noble. However, as the story progresses, the concept of justice becomes increasingly complex and morally ambiguous, reflecting the difficulties of achieving true justice in a war-torn society.

Question 2

Saviour

Answer 2

Shesma (Self-perception)
Analysis: The Whatsitsname’s perception of itself as a savior highlights the subjective nature of morality in the novel. Despite its violent actions, the creature believes in its righteous mission, mirroring how various factions in the Iraq conflict may view their own actions as justified.

Question 3

Innocent victims

Answer 3

Narrator (Irony)
Analysis: This phrase underscores the tragic irony of the Whatsitsname’s quest for justice. In its pursuit of vengeance for innocent victims, it creates more innocent victims, highlighting the moral complexities of retribution and the often unintended consequences of seeking justice through violence.

Question 4

End to injustice

Answer 4

Shesma (Motivation)
Analysis: This quote reveals the Whatsitsname’s initial noble intention, highlighting the complexity of morality in a war-torn society where the pursuit of justice can lead to further violence.

Question 5

Subversive power

Answer 5

Narrator (Symbolism)
Analysis: This phrase symbolizes the potential for challenging established power structures, reflecting the novel’s exploration of resistance and the blurred lines between heroism and terrorism.