Goldfarb - capital allocation Flashcards
capital allocation methods
Proportional Allocation Based on Risk Measure
Incremental Allocation
Marginal Allocation
Co-Measures Approach
Proportional Allocation Based on Risk Measure
- capital is allocated based on distribution of a given risk measure
- calculates standalone risk measures for each risk source and then allocates the total risk capital in proportion to the separate risk measures
**capital is allocated proportional to paricular risk measure
Incremental Allocation
- incremental contribution of particular risk to risk measure is derived and used as basis of allocation
- allocate capital based on the marginal impact on risk capital due to adding the entire line to the remainder of the business (other lines)
**capital is allocated proportional to marginal impact on risk capital
Allocated capital i = [risk measure(all sources)-risk measure(all ex-source i)]/Ʃ[risk measure(all sources)-risk measure(all ex-source i)] * total risk capital
Marginal Allocation
- marginal methods are based on marginal increments of the risk
- allocate capital based on the marginal impact on risk capital due to increasing the exposure of the line by incremental portions
Myers-Read
method is based on fact that total potential losses usually exceed the assets of firm and therefore view insurer’s owners as essentially having an option to default on obligation
-Myers-read method allocates capital to equalize the marginal impact of each business unit on the value of the option
Myers-Read relationship
-capital allocated to a line is proportional to covariability with loss portfolio and inversely proportional to covariability with asset portfolio
Myers-Read advantage and disadvantages
-method usually produces a more appropriate result than incremental allocation but may not be practical if risk sources can’t be represented proportional to revenue/expected losses or if it is difficult to determine marginal impact
- not developed to determine the risk adjusted capital requirement
- requires significantly more quantitative resources than other methods -> mathematical challenges have indicated that it may not be appropriate for most insurance applications
Co-Measures Approach
particular risk measure first has to be adopted to determine capital requirement of entire firm
Co-measure: derived by calculation the equivalent risk measures for individual business unit in cases where firmwide measures exceed a threshold
-capital is allocated proportional to co-measure
**co-measure(i) is value of particular risk based on risk measure of entire firm
5 examples of applications of risk adjusted performance metrics
- assessing capital adequacy: when deciding whether insurers have sufficient capital
- setting risk management priorities: insurer can identify the segment/activity that is generating the most risk capital
- evaluating alternative risk management strategies: insurer can examine the impact of risk management strategy on RAROC
- risk adjusted performance measurement
- insurance policy pricing
regulators and rating agencies ask several questions
does the firm have enough capital to meet PH obligations
- does management understand the source of risks in business
- does management actively measure/manage its exposure to risk
important to note that RAROC measurement and subsequent conclusions are highly sensitive to
capital allocation method that is adopted
RAROC can be used directly in insurance pricing & assumption
insurer can set a price that would target a specific RAROC
- one method is to determine additional risk margin that needs to be added to current premium in order to arrive at target
- note assumption made that risk margin is earning same expected rate of investment return as premiums
Investment Income on Allocated Capital
- definition of economic profit above did not include the investment income expected to be earned on risk capital
- target return is actually technically an excess return over investment rate
- for it to be true target return, investment return on risk capital would need to be included
methods in the industry that are commonly used to derive the
Cost of Risk Capital variable
CAPM and the Fama French models
there are a number of issues with using these models
issues with CAPM model being used to derive cost of risk capital variable
CAPM as hurdle rate issue = Each line of business has different amounts of risks and different amounts of surplus supporting it. Hence the same rate for all lines is not appropriate.
- definition of risk used by CAPM is systematic risk associated with investment but RAROC is based on totally different type of risk (difference between cash flow’s expected value and values in tail)
- denominator of RAROC is understated since it does not account for franchise value and as result, RAROC value is overstated