GM 1404 Flashcards
Inom parateserna indikerar på vilket kapitel kortet hör till.
Exempel: (Regulation) = Chapter 4
Market Failure ? (Regulation)
Implies that there’re inefficient allocation of goods and services and that !!one party could become better off without any other party becoming worse off as an result!!
4 market failures categories ? (Regulation)
Asymmetric information, public goods, externalities and market power (concentrated).
Asymmetric information ? (Regulation)
Incomplete information could create opportunism. Regulation is needed to create more comparable information and reduce asymmetric information.
Public goods and externalities? (Regulation)
Accounting could be seen as a public good. As one party will pay for it but everyone can later use and benefit from it.
Externalities = Could be negative or positive. In accounting there’s usually positive externalities because there are only the firm who will pay for creating the financial report but there will be a lot of users (who just benefit from it). Problem without regulation could thus be “underproduction of accounting” as firms try to minimise their costs creating them. But too much information could also be problematic, thus with regulation they try to achieve a “desirable” amount of accounting information.
Market Power? (Regulation)
-Protect the consumer!
-Natural monopoly, high entry barriers, first-move advantages etc.
- Regulators would like to increase total output of the companies to maximise social welfare.
Why regulate? Pros & Cons. (Regulation)
Pros:
Protects the consumers.
Lower the chances of new financial crisis.
Cons:
Could be more costly than private contracts.
Firms could become more risk averse.
Principle based vs. Rule based (Regulation)
Same info as in the accounting class. Principle = more “up for discussion” and Rule = You have to follow this.
State regulation pros & cons (Regulation)
Pros:
- Advantage of being clearly enforceable through the court system.
Cons:
- Could take a long time to change.
Private standard setters, pros and cons? (Regulation)
Pros:
- More up to changes and can adapt quicker.
Cons:
- Feasibility of successful enforcement of this type of regulation is less evident. (Möjligheten att framgångsrikt verkställa denna typ av reglering är mindre uppenbar.)
Anglo-American Group and Continental group (Regulation)
AAG = Canada, US and UK.
CG = Europe (ex UK)
Big difference is that AAG focuses on Equity investors and CG on creditors and banks.
See pic:
Equity investors vs. Creditors? (Regulation)
Creditors has a lot more to loose (asymmetric economic exposure) as if the company goes bad, than they will lose all their leverage to the company. Equity investors has the choice of selling their part before it’s too late.
Harmonisation? (Regulation)
More global from 90s encouraged harmonisation through out accounting. Listed firms from CG countries started to move towards AAG for higher harmonisation (because of the more cross-boarder investments happening in the world). Non-listed firms in CG countries remained the same.
The qualitative characteristics of CF ? (CF)
See pic:
(CF)
End the two sentences:
1. “Those who believe faithful representation should be prioritised over relevance…”
- “Those who favor relevance are…”
- “Tend to support historical costs as a basis for measurement”
- “More open to fair value accounting”
Read the pic for more info.
Matching principle ? (CF)
States that expenses should be matched to the revenues they help to generate.
Prudence (Conservatism) ? (CF)
States that it’s better to overestimate liabilities and underestimate assets.
Have pros and cons.
Pro is that you could handle economic surprises better. May also benefit creditors because of their asymmetric exposure in contrast to equity investors.
Cons is for example that it’s harder for people to correctly value the company.
Substance over form? (CF)
Refers to the idea that financial statements should reflect the economic substance rather than the legal form of events and conditions. IFRS 16 “Leasing” is a good example of this where lease agreements are accounted for in accordance with their economic substance rather than their legal form.
True and fair view? (CF)
No stated definition of what is consider a true and fair view, but refers to the quality of being truthfully about underlying economic phenomena by being “accurate and comprehensive to within acceptable limit” (A cost-benefit analysis could be necessary to determine what these limits are).
4 issues regarding accounting? (Structure of accounting issues = SOAI)
- Definition of financial statement elements
2.Recognition and measurement: 4 styled Accrual situations (SAS)
- Measurement bases
- Disclosure
Definition of financial statement elements ? (SOAI)
Assets, Liabilities, Income and Expenses.
Recognition and measurement: 4 styled Accrual situations (SAS)? (SOAI)
- Acquisition of resources
- Future outflows of resources
- Changes in value of existing items.
- Revenue recognition
Measurement bases ? (SOAI)
See picture:
Disclosure? (SOAI)
Definition of financial statement elements, assets and liabilities? (SOAI)
Assets = “Is a present economic resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events.” Defined as “rights” in CF 2018, not as “the asset”.
Liabilities = Is a present obligation of the entity to transfer an economic resource as a result of past events.
Both assets and liabilities are since 2018 not separated from the recognition criteria.
Definition of financial statement elements, Equity ? (SOAI)
Refers to the money that belongs, after contractual and debts being deducted, to the equity holders (sometime referred as residual claimants).
Definition of financial statement elements, Income and expenses ? (SOAI)
“Income is increases in assets or decreases in liabilities that result in increases in in equity, other than those relating to contributions from holders of equity claims”
“Expenses are decreases assets or increases in liabilities that result in decreases in equity, other than those realting to distributions to holder of equity shares”
Income and Expenses are linked to performance (important to remember!)
“The longer the time-period between financial statement recognition and cash flow…?” (SOAI)
“The higher uncertainty”
Historical cost ? (CF)
Current value ? (CF)
Historical costs is the price payed for an asset when it was required, or the consideration accepted at the time of taking on a liability.
Current value has 3 different types:
- Fair value = The market price of the item.
- Value in use = Based on discounted future cash flows.
- Current cost = The price in a hypothetical current transaction to acquire an asset or take on a liability.
Entry price and exit price? (SOAI)
Entry price = is the price payed by the firm to acquire an asset or the amount received for taking on a liability.
Exit price = The price received upon disposal of an asset or the amount paid to settle a liability.
Initial measurement and subsequent measurement? (SOAI)
IM = Occurs when an item is recognised in the financial statement.
SM = Fair value may change and the two measures can therefore diverge. Historical costs and fair value is only used in this kind of measurement.
Current value are more difficult to estimate than historical value? True or False. (SOAI)
True. Historical value are based on transaction that has already occurred and is thus objectively verifiable.
Problems with historical costs? 3 problems. (SOAI)
- Deciding what’s included in historical costs when there are incidental costs (oförutsägbara kostnader).
- Assets acquired as a package where cost must be determined for individual items.
- Exchange transactions that do not involve cash.
Timing? (SOAI)
Is a key factor for recognition of items in the financial statement.
Measurement bases for different items in IFRS (picture only) - (SOAI)
See Pic:
Fair value is defined as? (SOAI)
Market price.
What about fair value in theory and practice? (SOAI)
Fair-value measurement is seen with scepticism and does according to CF not be used for measurements that involves high uncertainties. The use of fair-value is a concrete example of the trade off between relevance and faithful representation. See pic for what items that are used for fair-value measures and which who aren’t.
Optimal contracts? (Incentives)
Align the interests of managers and shareholders, are often considered the most efficient alternative to direct monitoring by the owners and the board of directors. They could be incentive contracts that tie the manager’s pay to firm performance. An important question is, however, which measures of firm performance are relevant for the performance evaluation of managers.
Incentive contracts? (Incentives)
- Bonus plans and profit-sharing.
- Net income is the main piler for achieving these rewards.
Informativeness principle? (Incentives)
Any additional information that provides informative signal about the agent’s actions and efforts and allows for a more accurate judgement of his/her performance, is useful for improving the efficiency of compensation contracts.
What is crucial when evaluating accounting performance measurements? (Incentives)
The quality of the accruals! As they are subject to both unintentional errors and deliberate bias, cause net income to be a noisy measure of performance in compensation contracts.
Fair value accounting ? (incentives)
- fair value accounting is considered to be less conservative and more value relevant compared to historical cost accounting.
- The proponents of fair value accounting have empathised its role in enhancing the transparency and comparability of accounts, which can have a direct implication for the efficiency of contracts. Fair value-based reports may also enhance the stewardship role by directing managers toward the value of shareholders’ equity. However, there are also some drawbacks of using the fair value with respect to the stewardship role of accounting. Penman (2007) notes that managers should be rewarded for adding value (earnings) and not based on arbitrary changes in market prices. Earnings volatility due to fair value accounting can lead to noisy measurement of managerial performance and therefore be less attractive. Furthermore, fair value accounting increases the need for managers to exercise judgement and make estimates, which exposes shareholders to greater risks of expropriation.
Market based performance measures ? (incentives)
- Based on stock price.
- Share-based compensation can incentive managers to undertake risky projects and increase the long-term value of the firm.
- The main benefit of using share price in compensation contracts is that unlike net income, share price can also reflect expected future benefits; that is, it is not deflated by conservative accounting policies. This implies that firms relying on future revenues to support current operations may prefer to use share price as a main driver of compensation contracts.
- Less likely to be exposed for opportunistic behaviour from managers (bias).
opportunistic accounting choices ? (Incentives)
- Serve to maximize managers’ utility.
- Opportunistic choices of accounting procedures are also referred to as earnings management.
Earnings management? (Incentives)
Occurs when managers use judgement in financial reporting and in structuring transactions to alter financial reports to either mislead some stakeholders about the underlying economic performance of the company or to influence contractual outcomes that depend on reported accounting numbers.
What is important to have in mind when accounting-based compensation contracts are used? (Incentives)
Opportunistic behaviour from managers (they want to maximise their own utility).
Efficiency perspective and opportunistic perspective? (Incentives)
1) Efficiency perspective – suggests that discretionary accounting choices leads to efficient contracts
2) Opportunistic perspective – suggest that managers take advantage of the flexibility in accounting choices after knowing the nature of the contract, thereby reducing its efficiency.
*In other words, while performance based compensation plans may potentially mitigate conflicts of interest, the same contracts may encourage mangers to manipulate the accounting information for their own benefit and thus increase their pay.
What are said more about bonus plans? (Incentives)
Bonus plans is more likely to lead to income-increasing accruals in earlier periods, since these lead to higher accounting earnings and therefore an increased amount of earnings-based bonuses in those periods.
The political cost hypothesis and The litigation cost hypothesis?
-Firms that do not respond appropriately to political pressures face political costs, which may induce them to make opportunistic accounting choices in order to avoid such costs.
- The litigation cost hypothesis predicts that managers increase disclosures in the wake of controversial events or circumstances in order to avoid penalization.
The big bath hypothesis (Incentives)
Predicts that if firm performance is poor at the time a new CEO is appointed, the new CEO may think it is advantageous to flush out losses feared to materialise soon enough anyway.
Rule-based vs principle based standards ? (Incentives)
Rules-based standards also risk reducing the ability of financial statements to faithfully represent underlying economics. By contrast, management may convey private information to investors through its estimates and judgements, which has positive implications for capital markets. A trade-off many standard-setters (and investors) are willing to accept.
Conclusion for accounting quality, in terms of incentives - two ways? (Incentives)
1) The quality – and thus usefulness – of accounting has implications for whether accounting numbers may serve as a basis for evaluating executives and thus constitute viable measures of performance in incentive plans.
2) The quality of accounting is partially determined by executive incentives to make opportunistic accounting choices (that benefit the executives)
Read only from the incentive chapter:
Ironically, the plans used for incentivizing executives to act in the shareholders’ interest may likewise provide incentives to manipulate the accounts – since these are used as basis of measurement in those plans.
If accounting is so important for contractual efficiency, one might ask why standard-setters and shareholders allow managers to exercise discretion and judgement. After all, opportunistic managers can misuse accruals to overestimate earnings and thus increase their compensation. Further, accounting choices may be made to avoid penalization from political and market forces. This leads us back to the rationales for principles-based accounting and the idea that only by allowing managers to convey their private information can faithful representation and relevance – and thus usefulness – be achieved. Nevertheless, in the presences of incentives, restrictions on accounting manipulations (and real decisions) are needed. This is where additional internal governance mechanisms and enforcement by external authorities come into the picture.
Enforcement & Monitoring? (EMI)
Enforcement - the act of ensuring that rules, laws, standards or directives are adhered to or followed in the way intended.
Monitoring – the act of overseeing a firm’s activities with the intention of detecting deficiencies in a timely manner, so that preventive or corrective measures can be introduced.
Two institutional environment? (EMI)
Country-level enforcement:
Accounting enforcement is defined as the activities undertaken by independent bodies (monitoring, reviewing, educating and sanctioning) to promote firms’ compliance with accounting standards in their statuary financial statements. The idea behind this is that with stricter enforcement, one expects the usefulness of financial reports to increase. The need for enforcement is primary derived from the significant discretion given to managers in applying accounting standards. Interpretation and implementation guidance from external enforcers, along with continuous reviews and monitoring within firms, may help facilitate compliance.
The importance of country-level enforcement is becoming increasingly recognised where studies have concluded that there are capital market benefits of adopting IFRS (such as increased liquidity). However, these benefits are only fully understood by also considering countries’ legal and institutional settings and enforcement.
The legal environment:
One aspect of the institutional environment often referred to in the accounting literature is the legal tradition. As we saw in chapter 4, a distinction is made between code law and common law countries (Angelo-American countries). Common law countries show a greater extent of legal protection of investor rights, including voter rights and protection against appropriation by management. So, what implications does this have for accounting outcomes and accounting quality? Whilst increased corporate transparency may encourage widespread ownership, this also creates a demand for transparency. In order to reduce information asymmetry and agency costs, firms with higher ownership dispersion (ägarespridning) must maintain a high quality in their disclosures and reported earnings.
In code law countries, shareholders often hold a large block of stock and voting rights. They also appoint their representatives to sit on the board and thus get inside information. Thus, decreasing the need of high-quality reporting.
Corporate governance ? (EMI)
(Definition: “Corporate Governance refers to the set of mechanisms that influence the decisions made by managers when there is separation of ownership and control”)
To summarize, the optimal combination of governance mechanisms in a firm depends on the unique situation of that firm. We continue this section with threeimportant firm-specific governance mechanisms: ownership structure, board of directors and auditing.
3 parts within corporate governance? (EMI)
Ownership structure (Dispersed or concentrated), Board of directors, Auditors.
Conclusion of the chapter (EMI)
Greater transparency and higher-quality earnings enable compensation committees to better evaluate managers’ performance and design more efficient compensation contracts. Other governance mechanisms, such as auditors and other forms of enforcement of accounting standards, should be in place to ensure high-quality accounting. In shaping and being shaped by other governance mechanisms, accounting is considered one of the essential components of this complex equilibrium process.
Which of the 4 SAS relates to assets? (Assets)
The first (SAS 1: Acquisition of resource) and the third: (SAS 3: Changes in value of existing items)