Global environmental governance Flashcards

1
Q

Why is global enviro governance a necessity?

A
  • Global Tragedy of the Commons
  • Global authority can put sanctions on states
  • Centralised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why has there been no global intervention until now?

A
  • Norm of Westphalian global order- non-intervention
  • Can’t control other countries so turn a blind eye
  • Rich Western states asked to fix problems from which they are greatly benefitting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the significance of the United Nations Environmental Program 1972 Stockholm Summit?

A
  • Birth of global enviro pol
  • Established long-standing norms of how problems should be addressed
  • More than 500 multilateral enviro agreements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the theory of realism?

A

• Bleakest view on states and human nature
• Claim because system is anarchic 1) states can’t trust each other, 2) states can only survive by gaining power over each other
• Skeptical about Multilateral enviro agreements- think its more zero-sum power- if I can lock you into agreement that advantages me over you why wouldn’t I do that- states love to play this power game
• HIGHLIGHTS IMPORTANCE OF POWER POLITICS
STATES TRYING TO MANIPULATE EACH OTHER AND GAIN WEALTH/ POWER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the theory of liberal institutionalism?

A
  • Anarchy doesn’t mean states can’t cooperate
  • States always prefer to cooperate if possible
  • Many states are positive-sum
  • Rule-based forum means they can trust each other
  • ENVIRO TIDE WILL BENEFIT ALL
  • REGIMES= CREATE SYSTEMS OF RULES, TRUST, ORDER, COOPERATION
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the theory of constructivism?

A
  • Libs and realists wrong because they are looking about material interest, but the world is shaped by ideas and norms
  • Fluid, constructed, evolving norms
  • States want to fit in w community of nation states
  • NOTIONS OF ENVIRO AND ENVIRO CRISIS ARE CONSTRUCTED AND HAVE SHAPED THE WAY WE THINK ABOUT ENVIRO
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the theory of Marxism?

A
  • Critical
  • IR always reflective of the power of economic interests
  • Transnational corporations exercise huge power over states and so states are compelled to act in their interests
  • MEAS ONLY EVER BEEN SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE OF CAPACITY OF CERTAIN INTERESTS TO PROFIT FINANCIALLY FROM IT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 3 phases of regime development?

A
  1. Agenda setting- initial framing of issue
  2. Negotiation: creating rationale, govt meet
  3. Regime strengthening- modifying obligations over time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What constitutes an effective regime?

A
  • Compliance
  • Problem solving
  • Disagreements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why have most MEAs failed?

A
  • Declining political support- negotiations too removed from implementation at home
  • Disagreements
  • Lack of enforcement capacity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the Montreal protocol on ozone?

A
  • Most successful MEA
  • Agenda setting- link between CFCs (chlorofluorocarbon) ad ozone depletion
  • Negotiations- Grouped unlikely countries, US keen to as had already developed alternatives to CFCs so happy to sign
  • Negotiations started in 86, signed in 87
  • Regime strengthening- continued research into neg effects of CFCs consolidating decision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the implementation issue inwiththe Montreal protocol on ozone?

A
  • Developing states wanted developed to subsidise shift over- didn’t want to pay for problem they didn’t create
  • Response was an eventual tech transfer in 1990
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the realist explanation for the Montreal protocol on ozone?

A

It was an example of power politics- only succeeded because of US involvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the liberal explanation for the Montreal protocol on ozone?

A
  • States acknowledge danger of problem- benefits of cooperation outweighed costs
  • States could trust each other thanks to good regime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the constructivist explanation for the Montreal protocol on ozone?

A

• Ozone hole created moral and ethical impulse to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Marxist explanation for the Montreal protocol on ozone?

A
  • Powerful corporate interests
  • Ensured profitable global markets
  • Corporations compelled US state- so it signed for economic accumulation
17
Q

What happened in the Kyoto Protocol (97)?

A
  • 80s- consensus climate change is real
  • Legally binding targets
  • Aus never signed
18
Q

What was the outcome of the Kyoto Protocol?

A
  1. Divisions amongst developed countries
    • US (30% of world emissions) and Aus refuse to comply
  2. North-South Divide
    • Devloping want to make sure growth isn’t impeded (China biggest)
    • Argue renewable tech should be freely provided to them
    • This time, unlike Montreal, West don’t fold
  3. Economic implications
    • Magnitude of impact on economy of states made them reluctant
  4. Disagreement over metrics
    • Metric determines winners/ losers
    • ie per capita emissions Aus worse than US
  5. Relative inertia of renewables
    • Fossil fuel abundance/ low pices
  6. Special interest lobbies
  7. Politicisation of science
19
Q

What is the Marxist explanation for the success of Montreal but not Kyoto protocol?

A

Chemical vs carbon-based

Chemical- biggest player already had solutions, vs the lifeblood of global economy

20
Q

What is the Liberal explanation for the success of Montreal but not Kyoto protocol?

A

States couldn’t find common ground in climate change, but should have trusted each other like in ozone

21
Q

What is the Realist explanation for the success of Montreal but not Kyoto protocol?

A

Powerful states led ozone, where as here most powerful state didn’t want to sign and only did upon big concessions

22
Q

What is the Constructivist explanation for the success of Montreal but not Kyoto protocol?

A

Ozone uncontested scientific and public consensus, whereas climate change bigger concept to wrap mind around/ define/ agree upon