Gifts & Trusts Flashcards
What are the 3 certainties? Case.
Knight v Knight:
- Intention.
- Subject matter.
- Object.
What 3 further requirements must a trust meet?
- Properly declared.
- Beneficiary principle.
- Rules against perpetuities.
When declaring a trust, must the settlor use the word ‘trust’ in order for there to be certainty of intention? Case.
No, provided the intention is clear - Paul v Constance.
What type of wording must/must not be used when declaring a trust in order for there to be certainty of intention? Case.
Precatory wording must not be used; an obligation must be imposed - Re Adams and Kensington Vestry.
Will phrases such as ‘the bulk’ of be sufficiently clear for certainty of subject matter? Case.
No - Palmer v Simmonds.
Will phrases such as ‘reasonable income’ of be sufficiently clear for certainty of subject matter? Case.
Yes, if workable formula available, but probably won’t work for capital - Re Golay.
Must gift/trust property be segregated from like non-gift/trust property? Case. What is the exception? Case.
Yes - Re London Wine Co, unless property is intangible - Hunter v Moss.
What is the test for certainty of object for fixed trusts? Case.
Complete list test - IRC v Broadway Cottages.
What is the test for certainty of object for discretionary trusts? Case.
Given postulant test - McPhail v Doulton.
What guidance was given for the given postulant test? Case/judges.
Re Baden’s WT.
- Stamp - ‘don’t knows’ means trust fails.
- Sachs - postulant must prove he falls within class.
- Megaw - if enough fall within class, trust succeeds.
What is the test for certainty of object for power of appointment? Case.
Given postulant test - Re Gestetner’s Settlement.
Even where there is certainty of object, for what 2 reasons might a trust fail? Cases.
- Administrative unworkability - ex parte West Yorkshire Metropolitan CC.
- Capriciousness - Re Manisty’s Settlement.
How must a trust be declared? 3 ways, authorities.
- Personalty - no formality.
- Land - signed writing - s53(1) LPA.
- Will - signed w/2 witness - s9 Wills Act.
What is the beneficiary principle? Case.
Must be ascertainable human beneficiary to enforce the trust - Morice v Bishop of Durham.
4 exceptions to the beneficiary principle? 2 cases.
- Animals - Re Hooper.
- Graves - Re Dean.
- Charitable trusts.
- Denley trusts.
Why will a charitable trust not violate the beneficiary principle?
Enforced by the Attorney-General.
What 3 criteria must a charitable trust meet?
- Charitable purpose.
- Public benefit.
- Exclusively charitable.
What guidelines does the Charity Commission give on ‘public benefit’?
Must provide a tangible benefit to the public at large, and benefit must be closely connected to charity’s aims.
In what 2 situations will an organisation not have a ‘public benefit’? Cases.
- Beneficiaries connected by family - Re Compton.
2. Beneficiaries connected by employment - Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co.
How will a non-charitable purpose trust be saved? Case.
If ascertainable beneficiaries derive a tangible benefit, they can enforce the trust - Re Denley.
How will a gift without a purpose to an unincorporated association be saved? Case.
As a gift to members, as accretion to club funds, to be used according to the club’s rules - Re Recher’s WT.
In what 2 ways may a gift with a purpose to an unincorporated association be saved? Case.
Re Lipinski:
- Under Re Recher’s WT construction.
- Under Re Denley construction.
What type of association will not be allowed to receive a gift? Case.
One which has a business purpose - Conservative & Unionist Office v Burrell.
In order not to offend the rule against inalienability of capital, what must a club’s rules allow? Case.
It must allow the members to dissolve the club and distribute the capital - Re Grant’s WT.