Genesis Content Flashcards
Primary Purpose of the Creation account
- To exalt the eternal God who alone created the heaven and the earth.
- To evoke from man the worship, adoration, obedience and love which belong to God alone.
- To prohibit any and all superstitious views of the universe.
- To provide a trustworthy history of the divine activity of God in creation.
- To prepare for the second portion of Genesis, dealing with man’s habitancy of God’s world.
Essential Teaching of the Creation account
- The origin of the world and of life was no accident.
- God made everything there is.
- All that God made was good.
- The highpoint of all God’s creative acts was the making of man.
- Mankind is distinguished from all other creatures: made in God’s own likeness, he is given charge over all the rest.
- God’s six days of creative activity followed by a day of rest sets the pattern for man’s working life.
Gen. 1:1 denies these philosophies:
- Atheism: no God
- Polytheism: many gods
- Fatalism: impersonal determinism
- Evolution: infinite becoming
- Pantheism: all is God
- Materialism: matter is eternal
- Dualism: good and evil are eternal
Days of Creation:
Day 1: Separated light from darkness Day 2: Separated sea and sky Day 3: Separated land from seas Day 4: Luminaries of day and night Day 5: Birds and fish Day 6: Animals and humans Day 7: God rested
Views on the Days of Creation:
Literal Day View (24 hours) - terms evening and morning, numerical understanding
Day-Age View (indefinite time) - Day “yom” is used multiple ways. Gen. 2 seems to be more than 1 day.
Views on the Date of Creation:
Concordist Views for Young Earth: Flood Theory, Appearance of Age Theory.
Old Earth: Gap Theory, Literal-Day-with-Gaps Theory, Day-Age Theory.
Nonconcordits Interpretations: Framework Theory (days are snapshots of God’s creative work).
Analogical Days Theory (Days are God’s workdays, length is not specified or important.
Functional Cosmic Temple Theory (Days are sequential calendar days, but are the period of time devoted to the inauguration of the functions of the cosmic temple).
Days of Revelation Theory (series of statements to man about what God had done in ages past).
Theistic Evolution: God used the process of evolution to create living things, including humans.
Lessons from History
- Danger of Misinterpreting Scripture - don’t ignore scientific evidence that seems to contradict the ‘general impression’ interpretation of Genesis 1.
- Danger of Overestimating Science - Goal is not to seek to satisfy science.
3 Views on humans being made in the image of God
- Traditional (Substantive) View - Resemblance (who we are)
- Representative (Functional) View - What we do (near Eastern statues)
- Relational View - How we relate
Relationship between Gen. 1 and 2
In Subject Matter: Complementary, not contradictory
In Style: Genesis 2 is not chronological, but topical
Purpose of the Babylonian Account of Creation (Enuma Elish)
Written to honor Marduk, God of Babylon
Similarites between the Genesis account and the Enuma Elish
- Original mass of material was water.
- Two bodies of water separated by firmament.
- Narrative divided into seven parts.
- Heavens, earth, firmament created first; then celestial bodies; then man.
Differences between the Genesis account and the Enuma Elish
- EE is Polytheistic, Gen 1:1 is Monotheistic.
- Matter is eternal in EE, while Matter was created by God from nothing in Gen.
- Earth and water formed from preexisting matter in EE, in Gen., earth and water created from nothing.
- EE has no record of creation of vegetation, animals, birds, reptiles, fish. Gen. is a clear account of creation of all of these.
- In EE, man created to serve gods. In Gen., man created to rule the earth and its inhabitants.
- in EE, Marduk’s creative acts required great effort. God’s creative acts required only spoken word.
Explanations of Similarities in EE and Genesis accounts
- Genesis account drew from the Babylonian account.
- Babylonian account drew from the Genesis account.
- They are independent accounts that possibly go back to a common source.
Views on the identification of the tempter
- Figurative
- Reptile (used by Satan)
- Non-reptile (Satan)
Threefold pattern of the Temptation
- Lust of the Flesh
- Lust of the Eye
- The Pride of Life