Generally Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Felony

A

crime punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year or death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Misdemeanor

A

crime punishable by imprisonment for no more than one year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Proportionality principle

A

criminal conduct and punishment are calibrated/set to be proportionate to the severity of harm caused and societal judgment value of moral blameworthiness
a. Culpability (responsibility for a fault or wrong)
b. Dangerousness
c. Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rule of Legality

A
  1. “no crime without law, no punishment without law”
  2. Rigorous enforcement of legality means dangerous people aren’t always punished (Keeler v. State)
  3. Prohibits retroactive lawmaking (roots from ex post facto clause and due process clause)
    a. DPC: “provide a person of ordinary intelligent fair notice of what is prohibited”
    b. Ex post facto example: prohibition
  4. Vague statutes are unacceptable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Punishment

A

when an agent of the government intentionally inflicts pain or suffering based off a conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What accompanies criminal punishment?

A

Community condemnation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When a statute contains a common law term…

A

…the presumption is that it retains its common law meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rule of Lenity (a/k/a rule of strict construction)

A
  1. Biased in favor of the accused
  2. Strict construction of statutes
  3. Should only be used as “last resort” or “tie breaker” in statutory interpretation
  4. Not based in Constitution, but supports principle of legality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Constitutional Limits: Vagueness

A

i. A court considering a vagueness challenge must ask whether a “person of ordinary intelligence” can understand the terms used by the legislature, but not whether the defendant in fact knew what the statute means
ii. If the statute is vague, the court must treat the law as a nullity (“void for vagueness”)
iii. Doctrine of overbreadth: criminal statutes may not infringe on those Constitutionally protected rights; provides that a regulation of speech can sweep too broadly and prohibit protected as well as non-protected speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3 protections afforded by the vagueness doctrine

A

(1) allow people to avoid unlawful acts by changing their conduct, (2) prevent arbitrary or discriminatory law enforcement, (3) avoid limiting freedom of speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Constitutional Limits: Privacy

A

2 men having sex in privacy of their home violated TX statute; TX statute infringed on Constitutional right to privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Constitutional Limits: Proportionality

A

i. “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines be imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishment inflicted.” (8th Amendment)
1. Sanction imposed on the defendant should correspond with the crime
ii. 3 facts to assess when determining if punishment is cruel or unusual: (1) the gravity of offense and harshness of penalty, (2) sentences imposed on other criminals in same jurisdiction, (3) sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elements of a crime (Common Law)

A

Act, mental state, causation, attendant circumstances (there must be a concurrence of the elements (elements must be present at the same time for the crime to have taken place))
-Example: drunk person sitting in parked vehicle doesn’t constitute driving while intoxicated b/c the proof wasn’t legally sufficient/concurrent because the person was not driving the vehicle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Material elements of a crime (Common Law)

A

must be proved by the prosecutor; conduct, attendant circumstances, result, mental state (CARM)
i. Conduct is often circumstantial evidence of mental state
ii. Not all crimes have a result***

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Element of an offense (MPC)

A

(i) such conduct or (ii) such attendant circumstances or (iii) such a result of conduct as:
a. (1) Is included in forbidden conduct in the definition of offense, or (2) establishes required culpability, or (3) negates an excuse or justification for such conduct or (4) negates a defense under the statute of limitations, or (5) establishes jurisdiction or venue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Material element of an offense (MPC)

A

an element that doesn’t relate exclusively to the statute of limitations, jurisdiction, venue, or to any other matter similarly unconnected with
a. (i) The harm or evil, incident to conduct, sought to be prevented by the law defining the offense, or (ii) the existence of a justification or excuse for such conduct

17
Q

Ex Post Facto

A

having affect retroactively

18
Q

Bill of Attainder

A

special unlawful legislation that declares a person to be guilty of a crime and punished without a trial or conviction

19
Q

3 types of statutory interpretation must know for this course

A

(1) intentionalism (effectuate lawmaker’s intentions); (2) textualism (plain meaning of statutes); (3) dynamic (considering present societal, political, and legal context)

20
Q

Test for proper jury instructions

A

Test for Jury Instructions
1.) Does the instruction correctly state the law?
2.) Is there evidence on record supporting the instruction?
3.) Does the substance of the tendered instruction is covered by other instructions which are given?