General Terminology Flashcards

1
Q

Residuary Estate

A

portion of estate remaining following distribution of assets and payment of costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

testamentary instrument

A

instrument that takes effect upon death of maker/testator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

intestate

A

die w/o will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

testator

A

one who executes will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

legal custodian

A

one who has legal responsibility for a person or person’s property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Disclaimer

A

Heir or devisee’s refusal to take property designated to him/her

Most often done to reduce taxes or keep property from creditors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

attestation

A

action required to be taken by witness to the execution of a document in order for that instrument to be subsequently valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

attestation clause

A

portion of the will where witnesses certify execution and method of execution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

executor

A

person designated to effectuate disposition of property pursuant to testamentary instrument following death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

legatee

A

person granted legacy or bequest pursuant to will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

clear and convincing evidence

A

evidentiary standard requiring that fact sought to be proven is reasonably certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

holographic will

A

will handwritten by testator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

testamentary intent

A

a determination that the document was intended to be a will and as such reflects the writer’s true wishes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

codicil

A

supplement to a will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

clear and convincing evidence

A

fact sought to be proven must be reasonably certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

May the doctrine of dependent relative revocation be applied to preserve a gift that was revoked by a codicil that the testator intended to be a valid substitute for the gift in the will, but which was actually invalid?

A

yes. Under the doctrine of dependent relative revocation, if the testator clearly intended that a revocation be dependent on the valid substitution of a subsequent gift or will, and the validity of that subsequent gift or will fails, then the revocation fails because it was dependent on the subsequent gift or will being valid.

lacroix v senecal

17
Q

doctrine of dependent relevant revocation

A

if the same person executes a will which revokes an earlier will, the earlier will is revoked only if the latter will is effective; otherwise the earlier remains in full effect and force

if new will fails for whatever reason court will assume T prefers estate divided based on old will rather than intestacy

18
Q

doctrine of integration

A

when a holographic will consists of more than one page it must be clearly apparent that T intended all pages to represent their final will and testament.

this can be shown by a clear reference by one of the pages to the other pages

or invalidated by contradictions made between pages

19
Q

Can a multipage document be admitted into probate as a will if it is not clearly apparent that the testator intended that all of the pages together should constitute his last will and testament?

A

No. Where a purported will contains more than one page, it must be made clearly apparent that the testator intended that all of the pages together should constitute his last will and testament.

20
Q

May an informal document not executed in the manner of a will be incorporated by reference into a will if the document was in existence when the testator executed a codicil to the will and evidence shows it to be the document referenced in the will?

A

Yes. If such a document was in existence at the time a codicil was executed, and the codicil ratifies the language referencing the informal document, the document may be incorporated by reference

21
Q

Is the mere fact that the provisions of two wills mirror each other sufficient to show an intent to make the provisions of the wills irrevocable?

A

No. The mere fact that the provisions of two wills mirror each other is insufficient to show intent to make the provisions of the wills irrevocable. Wills are generally unilaterally revocable. A will does not become irrevocable simply because it mirrors another’s will. Rather, there must be clear and satisfactory proof of the intent to make reciprocal wills binding contracts. Proof can be found in the express terms of the wills, presented through the testimony of witnesses, or implied from the circumstances. When presenting proof of intent through witnesses, their testimony must be sufficiently corroborated.

22
Q

reciprocal will

A

testamentary instruments pursuant to which two or more individuals make reciprocal provisions in favor of the other

23
Q

dead man’s statute

A

evidence of a deceased’s promises or statements may not be introduced by a claimant against the deceased’s estate

24
Q
A