General Considerations Flashcards
What comprises the national territory?
The national territory is comprised of:
- The Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein; Internal waters, or waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of breadth and dimension; and
- All other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction
What does the national territory consist of?
- Territorial sea, seabed, subsoil, insular shelves, and other submarine areas
- Terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domains
Define the Arichipelagic Doctrine.
A body of water studded with islands, or the islands surrounded with water, is viewed as a unity of islands and waters together forming one integrated unit. [N.B. Embodied in Art. II, specifically by the mention of the “Philippine archipelago” and the specification on “internal waters.”]
Treaty limits of the Philippine archipelago (enum)
- Treaty of Paris of 10 December 1898
- Treaty of Washington
- Treaty of 12 January 1930 between the United States and Great Britain
a. Treaty of Paris of 10 December 1898: “Spain cedes to the United States the archipelago known as the Philippines Islands, and comprehending the islands lying within the following line” xxx Article 3 defines the metes and bounds of the archipelago by longitude and latitude, degrees and seconds. Technical descriptions are made of the scope of the archipelago as this may be found on the surface of the earth.
b. Treaty of Washington of 7 November 1900 between the United States and Spain: Ceding Cagayan, Sibuto and Sulu.
c. Treaty of 12 January 1930 between the United States and Great Britain: Ceding the Turtle and Mangsee Islands. [Bernas (2003), cited in Justice Velasco’s concurring opinion in Magallona v. Ermita, G.R. No. 187167 (2011)].
What is the Straight Baseline Method?
consists of drawing straight lines connecting appropriate points on the coast without departing to any appreciable extent from the general direction of the coast, in order to delineate the internal waters from the territorial waters of an archipelago [NOTE: This is the method prescribed under the UNCLOS].
What is RA No 9522:Amended R.A. No. 3046?
“An Act to Define the Baselines of the Territorial Sea of the Philippines;”
R.A. No. 9522 is not unconstitutional:
(1) it is a statutory tool to demarcate the maritime zone and continental shelf of the Philippines under UNCLOS III, and does not alter the national territory.
(2) While UNCLOS III does not bind the Philippines to pass a baselines law, Congress may do so.
(3) The law also does not abandon the country’s claim to Sabah, as it does not expressly repeal the entirety of R.A. No. 5446 [Magallona v. Ermita,supra]
Define the Rule of State Immunity
General Rule: The State cannot be sued.
What is the exception to the State Immunity Rule?
When the State consents to be sued.
How does the State give to express consent to be sued?
a. Express consent
1. General law; or
2. Special law
How does the State give implied consent to be sued?
Implied consent
- the State commences litigation, it becomes vulnerable to a counterclaim;
- State enters into a business contract (it is exercising proprietary functions);
- When it would be inequitable for the State to invoke immunity;
- In eminent domain cases.
Definition of a State
A community of persons, more or less numerous, permanently occupying a definite portion of territory, independent of external control,
and possessing a government to which a great body of the inhabitants render habitual obedience;
a politically organized sovereign community independent of outside control bound by ties of nationhood,
legally supreme within its territory, acting through a government functioning under a regime of law [Collector of Internal Revenue v. Campos Rueda, G.R. No. 13250 (1971)].
Qualifications that the state as a person of international law should posses?
(a) a permanent population;
(b) a defined territory;
(c) government; and
(d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states
[Art. 1, Montevideo Convention].
What are the bases (constitutional, international law, jurisprudential) for the rule of state immunity?
Constitutional
Sec. 3, Art. XVI. The State may not be sued without its consent.
International Law
“Par in parem non habet imperium.”
Par in parem non habet imperium(Latinfor “equals have no sovereignty over each other”) is a general principle ofinternational law, forming the basis ofstate immunity.Because of this principle, a sovereign state cannot exercise jurisdiction over another sovereign state.
Jurisprudential
a. Positivist Theory – There can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the laws on which the right depends. Also called the doctrine of Royal Prerogative of Dishonesty. [Department of Agriculture v. NLRC, G.R. No. 104269 (1993)]
b. Sociological Theory – If the State is amenable to suits, all its time would be spent defending itself from suits and this would prevent it from performing its other functions [Republic v. Villasor, G.R. No. L-30671 (1973)].
When is a suit deemed to be against the state?
A suit is against the State regardless of who is named the defendant if:
a. It produces adverse consequences to the public treasury in terms of disbursement of public funds and loss of government property.
b. It cannot prosper unless the State has given its consent.
When is a suit not against the state?
It was held that the suit is not against the State:
- When the purpose of the suit is to compel an officer charged with the duty of making payments pursuant to an appropriation made by law in favor of the plaintiff to make such payment, since the suit is intended to compel performance of a ministerial duty [Begosa v. Philippine Veterans Association, G.R. No. L-25916(1970)].
- When, from the allegations in the complaint, it is clear that the respondent is a public officer sued in a private capacity;
- When the action is not in personam with the government as the named defendant, but an action in rem that does not name the government in particular.
How is express consent to suit against the state given?
Only by the will of the legislature, through the medium of a duly enacted statute; may be embodied either in a general law or a special law.
Laws granting express consent to sue the state
- Money claims arising from contract express or implied
Act no. 3083: An act Defining the Conditions under which the Government of the philippines may be sued
- Torts
a. liability of local government units - art 2189 CC
b. vicarious liability for special agents - art 2180 CC
c. liability under the local government code - sec 24 LGC
- Special Law - may come in the form of a private bill authorizing a named individual to bring suit on a special claim
When implied consent to suit against the state is present
a. In instances when the State takes private property for public use or purpose (eminent domain)
b. When the State enters into a business contract (in jure gestionis or proprietary functions)
c. When it would be inequitable for the State to invoke its immunity.
d. If the government files a complaint, defendant may file a counterclaim against it. When the state files a complaint, suability will result only where the government is claiming affirmative relief from the defendant.
Suits against Government Agencies depends on whether the agency is _______________ or _______________.
incorporated (there is a separate charter); unincorporated (no separate personality)
Can an unicorporated government agency who engages in principally propriety function be sued without consent?
Yes.
Suit will lie, because when the state engages in principally proprietary functions, it descends to the level of a private individual, and may, therefore be vulnerable to suit. [Civil Aeronautics Administration v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L51806 (1988)]. State may only be liable for proprietary acts (jure gestionis) and not for sovereign acts (jure imperii).
Whether suit will lie towards an incorporated government agency depends on its ______________.
Charter.
If the charter provides that the agency can sue, then the suit will lie.The provision in the charter constitutes express consent. [See SSS v. Court of Appeals, 120 SCRA 707 (1983)]
What is the general rule towards suits against public officers?
The doctrine of state immunity also applies to complaints filed against officials of the State for acts performed by them in the discharge of their duties within the scope of their authority.
What are the exception to the general rule re suits against public officers?
The doctrine of immunity from suit will not apply and may not be invoked where the public official is being sued in his
(1) private and personal capacity as an ordinary citizen, for
(2) acts without authority or in excess of the powers vested in him
[Lansang v. CA, G.R. No. 102667 (2000)].