General Flashcards

1
Q

Devel theories, strategies, ideologies

Post-WW2 - establshment of new world order

A

Hettne 1995

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 competing models of MDS - US intensive urban growth - tech etc.
SU - soviet pol induced grwoth - agri collec, indep of glecon

The geopolitics of US spreading capitalism

A

Westad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MDS theory - assessed and brought to bear on systemc improvement of wealth welfare
instrumental-rational approach
Technocratic, optimistic, modernist
Science and tech mastery of nature

A

Adams 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is good for US is good for the rest of the world

A

Frank 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Perez and Soete

A

Critiques of ‘take-off’ model and MDS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dependency theory

A

Potter et al. 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Critiques of dependency theory

A

Mahutga

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Green revolution

A

Khush

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Problems with green revolution

A

Falcon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dams and irrigation

A

Adams 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Critique of dependency theory

Quiet on qs of identity and diffs but focused on structure of econ and dep

A

Scott

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

NL model

A

Beck 2000, Brenner and Theodore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Transnat resistance, resistance to NL
Anti capitaist - bad consequences of chain and affect
Bound into market universally

A

Houtard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

alternative forum - World Social Forum

Focus on S/3W network

A

Ainger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

N-S Linkage

A

Katz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Resistance over devel - global geopol from below.
Struggle over RSs
Opposing corporate action and TNCs

A

Routledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Hell of PC countries entered in last 30 years were almost always justified by well-intentioned modernizers
Both liberal and communists also believed they knew best for lands

A

Gilman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Post - colonialise geog

A

Sharp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Pol geog and IR as state-centric

Require ^ engagement with complex and rich experiences of places rather than technical, managerialist pol machine

A

Ferguson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Assump A does not have meaningful pol, only humanit disasters
Need to postcolonialise geog

A

Dunn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Post-development

A

Escobar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Pov becomes an organizing concept - econ devel indicators. Big D devel = post-WW2 project of intervention
Diving world into spatial zones according to econ wealth
2 SPs established their own alliances
NAM brought together maj of 3W - voting bloc within UN collective identity
Emergence of new pol - sending global pol into flux

A

Potter et al. 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Ontologically claims Wester identities are based on the antagonistic perception of social diffs - self/other, N/S
Such idents aren’t culturally determined but purposively constructed

Fabricates sense of liminality within W nation

A

Bhahba 1983

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Eroding W-centric - dom of W in framing terms and content of devel debate - being eroded
X W devel paradigm
Econ rise of E.g. BRICs
I’s service-based, high-tech oriented econ growth doesn’t follow W econ devel
Rise of BRICs as paradigm

A

Six

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Global pol transformation - multipolar internat devel comm

A

Shaw et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Unravel dualistic thinking - ANT

A

Latour 2010

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Media has become metaphorically colonial

Powerful ability to exclude certain knowledges

A

Ojo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Global devels and the ‘WoT’after 9/11, takes of pov and TSM - P’s New Map
Sec-devel nexus (Duffield)
Aid linked to sex objectives
Ensuring WoT led by states self-defined as the ‘free’ or ‘civilized’
Just as devel once seen as X comm spread

A

Duffield

29
Q

geopol of aid and internat devel
Way S states seen lack necess degrees of ‘order’ - hierarchy and societal org
Assumps about nature of states in S - countries framed by discourses of e.g. US TSM

A

Sogge

30
Q

‘Soft-power diplomacy
Popular with a partners
Currency of co-option and attraction, values
Weakened monop of W donors over A devel

A

Wilson

31
Q

Neither C crops nor C gov done anything to benefit TUs of soc justice

A

Palat

32
Q

New ‘S’ donors question idea of devel coop as a W concept
Questions whole devel paradigm
Prod of geopol images and discourses by global aid agencies
Construction of devel narratives

Aid agencies campaigns include reps that narrate global disparities between regions
They are space-reducing practices
Their reps play huge role in conjuring up spaces like developing world reps

A

Struver

33
Q

S-S coop - alternative to W devel model

Wrenching global relations into flux

A

Shaw et al.

34
Q

Dehumanizing practices in GW

A

Muscati

35
Q

First televised war, media control of GW

A

Trainor

36
Q

Censoring for pol sec - press censorship or sec measures

A

Schanberg

37
Q

GW North

A

Ismail

38
Q

GW South

A

Pentagon Defence Dept. Expert 1998

39
Q

Admin of vaccines flawed
Antidotes for bio or nerve-gas weapons
Not been approved by US food and drug admin
‘informed consent not given’
Sev US veterans ‘testimones’ say invol admin of vaccines
Without proper med supervision

A

HofC Defence SC 1995

40
Q

EJ and environ justice

A

Cole and Foster

41
Q

Politicall charged Environment Justice

A

Bullard

42
Q

EJ combines equity of social, generational and prodedural

A

Cutter

43
Q

Noxious pollutants - NBDs important

A

Sze 2006

44
Q

Cult constructs - nations
Study of noxious pollutants shows how resids have found shared identity
Acted as pol agents due to fact = victimes of environ racism
Share imagined comm

A

Anderson 1991

45
Q

Idle no more

A

McGaa

46
Q

Love Canal

A

Levine

47
Q

Indiv devel and environ protection = heart of environ agenda

A

Taylor

48
Q

Precautionary principle

A

O’Riordan

49
Q

India - Coca Cola

A

Hills and Welford

50
Q

Geopolitics of media

A

Barnes and Duncan

51
Q

Discourses of media

A

Derrida

52
Q

Media is not the truth
Regimes of truth and knowledge been prod
Constructed through representational practices -> binaries
Remain widely circulated and accepted

A

Said

53
Q

Pol contexts of environ news - media colonialsm

A

Hall

54
Q

Cultural studies - emphasise importance of understanding way human subjects prod in society
Marxist theory played ^ role:
Emphasis on ideology and hegemony and issue-attention cycle in rise and fall of pub concerns for partic issues

A

Downs

55
Q

Media role in cult pol
Right to talk about cult pol of the environ
Diff groups struggle over meanings and values of environ
Mass media ^ role to play - ability to shrink time and space
Abstract - terra incognitae - now v real - ‘here’ and ‘there’

A

Burgess

56
Q

CC - media rep
Partic perspective
CC as imperializing force
Moral econ

A

Livingstone

57
Q

Are Nat Disasters socially constructed

A

Hansen

58
Q

Claims-making on CC - rarely localized in space or time
Environ knowledge is dammed by ‘disaster’ in terms of news worthy sensationalism
Anthropog CC invented and perpetuated for finan/ideology reasons -> devel nat pols to decrease CO2 and join internat negot to decrease CO2

A

Weingart et al.

59
Q
Free trade and WTO - 
Met with v criticism especc from develings - need checks and balances
Not level field 
Econ skewed towards N
Econs flooded with cheaper W goods
A

Kapstein 2006

60
Q

Alternative trade - coops
Worker owned entities rather than share held -> ‘spaces of hope’
‘Proliferative econ’ - customer satisfaction highest as workers want to max profit

A

Gibson-Graham 1994

61
Q

Beneftis of fair trade

A

Goodman

62
Q

Priorities of alternaternative approach to sust devel

A

Dacison et al.

63
Q

Political concept - SD not orig intended as econ terms
Remains pol objectives
More like ‘SJ’ and ‘demo’ with emancipatory goals
Brundtmen - now more economistic - has lost its critical edge

A

Jacobs

64
Q

Sustainable devel - asking the imposs?
If SJ genuninely offered tangible synergies between econ, environ and soc objectives
an implementation deficit’d be surprising

A

Owen and Cowell

65
Q

Sustainable devel from below

A

Clemencon 2012

66
Q

Post-Col criticisms

A

Dirlick

67
Q

Mimicry, theft, pillage, accum by disposs

EU is the creation of the 3W - the wealth that smothers it is stolen from the S

A

Fanon 1967

68
Q

Sustainable devel is creatively ambiguous so can be used in all pol ways

A

Mitchell