General Flashcards

1
Q

Theories are an organized set of claims and judgements about how the world works, both implicit and explicit.
Happens when common starting points can no longer be taken for granted

A

Collini 2012

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cannot avoid theory, need to constantly employ theoretical tools.
Notion of dominant paradigms does not neglect the less dominant features of the time

A

Hubbard et al. 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Theories can be known as dominant paradigms

A

Kuhn 1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ways of knowing drive research but also the creative potential as a discipline.
At broadest = set of statements and psopositions used to explain or interpret

A

Barnett 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Different claims forms a set to perform a theory in the singular

A

Gregory et al. 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ways of being

A

Ontology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ontology and discourse
E.g. power and domination - W devel strategy is seen as the ontological basis. Discourse may produce what is ontologically created.
Using term discourse also implies an ontology as presume that there are discourses - sometimes in discinction from something else e.g. discourse and practice, or discourse and the material world

A

Bhabha 1983

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Epistemology - ways of knowing. Theories, philosophies, constantly: refined, challenges, transformed

A

Aitken and Valentine 2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

All theories/knowledges are situated - not neutral or objective. Constructed partial, situated, positioned knowledge: fiction and theory situated
Limitation of feminism - it is theoretically based, so thus relies on a particular way of knowing the world produced from theoretical understanding

A

Haraway 1990

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Thus is a multitude of theories - theoretical frameworks never fixed
E.g. diff theoretical understandings of how the finan crisis began

A

Casatree et al. 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Theories akin to a map - practical means for understanding, engaging with world once understand theory itself. Provides us with routes and way of understanding what’s around

A

David Harvey 1960

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Concepts provide direction for thinking - moving beyond what we know

A

Colebrook 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Concept of state of emergency - normal space transforms. what are the consequences of this?
E.g. pol authority - who can enter/exist space in event of emergence
ANT can help us understand this trnasformation through relations and networks

A

Anderson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Concept of uneven devel - why areas in relation to UBS decline and then suddenly ^ in value

A

Smith 1979

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

As a theoretical framework, fem grounded in ontology & epistemology dedicated to:
Producing knowledge that promotes social change

A

Blunt and Wills 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Multiple competing models and theories of doing things, all with aim of being consequential. Consensus among geogs at any one time that there is one best way of doing things has seldom been stable

A

Hubbard et al. 2002

17
Q

Deconstructing binaries of human geog.

A

Cloke and Johnstone 2004

18
Q

To survive in world, we simplify it - using categs for self-identif - social constructions.
Catego therefore aren’t just ‘normal’ within society, but necessary for it.
Without simplifications, societies couldn’t exist e.g. who qualifies for subsidized uni ed?
Categ freq using in creating collective & personal identitie s- binaries - us and them

A

Jenkins 2000

19
Q

Binary creating difference - much geopol thinking involves promoting ‘positive images of ‘us’ and negatives ones of ‘them’ - ‘nothing can be one thing and its opposite at the same time’

A

Olsson 1980

20
Q

We need to escape tyranny of dualisms

A

Pile 1994

21
Q

Third terms

A

Bhabha 1990

22
Q

Third space combines the material and the symbolic to elude the politics of polarized binaries. Enables emergence of radical new alligiances - old structures of auth challenged. New emancipatory practices - recogs incorporation of excluded others

A

Doel 1999

23
Q

Critique of fem: theoretical understaning of world informed by comb of local experiences and broad generalisations. Conflict with emancip goals of fem theory to free silenced voices

A

Raghuram and Marge 2008

24
Q

In order to radically restructure the ‘right to theorize’, fem theory advocates use of action-oriented, dialogic methodologies to provide resistance X the existing, dominating paradigms.
Dislodge the hierarchic knowlege presented by researchers

A

Nagar 2012

25
Q

Constructions of societal identities relates to theory of performativity

A

Butler 1990

26
Q

Social norms legitimized through repetition - constructed phenomena. The identities have no ontological foundations

A

Huey and Berndt 208

27
Q

Discourses are entangled in networks of power

A

Gregson and Rose 1999

28
Q

Superiority and inferiority: knowledge legitimizes reps and becomes the organizing system of power

A

Hall 1992