General Flashcards

MPC definitions

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Elements required for a criminal conviction

A

1-Actus Reus
2-Mens Rea
3-Attendant Circumstances
4- Causing a certain result or harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus Reus 2.01 (2)

A

A person is not guilty of an offense unless his liability is based on CONDUCT WHICH INCLUDES A VOLUNTARY ACT or the omission to perform an act of which he is physically capable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mental Cuplability

A

(1) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF CULPABILITY. A PERSON IS NOT GUILTY OF AN OFFENSE UNLESS HE ACTED PURPOSELY, KNOWINGLY, RECKLESSLY OR NEGLIGENTLY, AS THE LAW MAY REQUIRE, WITH RESPECT TO EACH MATERIAL ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Omissions

A
  • Failure to act is only an offense if the law imposes a duty to act
  • Special relationship or legal duty must be established
  • Breach must be established

Moral obligation does not impose a duty

Pope v. State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mens Rea

A

People are subject to criminal sanction only when their behavior is accompanied by a culpable mental state.

Generally is a subjective awareness. What D thinks matters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blameworthy (CL Mens Rea)

A
  1. Intending to proscribed result
  2. Knowing one would cause a certain result
  3. in a way that substantially risks a result/ harm which one is aware
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Purposely

A

CONSCIOUS OBJECT

(i) if the element involves the nature of his conduct or a result thereof, it is his CONSCIOUS OBJECT to engage in conduct of that nature or to cause such a result; and
(ii) if the element involves the attendant circumstances, he is aware of the existence of such circumstances or he believes or hopes that they exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Knowingly

A

AWARE OF PRACTICAL CERTAINTY OF ReSULT

(i) if the:element involves the nature of-his conduct-or the attendant circumetances, he is AWARE that his conduct is of that-nature or that such circumstances exist;
(ii) if the element involves a result of his conduct, he is aware that it is PRACTICALLY CERTAIN that his conduct will cause such a result.

Requirement of knowledge satisfied by if a person is aware of a high probability of it’s existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Recklessly

A

CONSCIOUSLY DISREGARD OF SUBSTANTIAL CERTIAINTY
when he CONSCIOUSLY DISREGARDS a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from his conduct. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that, considering the nature and purpose of the actor’s conduct and the circumstances known to him, ITS DISREGARD involves a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a law-abiding person would observe in the actor’s situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Negligently

A

SHOULD BE AWARE OF RISK
i. Acts negligently when he SHOULD BE AWARE of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from his conduct.

ii. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the actor’s failure to perceive it, considering the nature and purpose of his conduct and the circumstances known to him involves a gross deviation from the standard of care that a REASONABLE PERSON would observe in the same situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ignorance or Mistake

A

1-Ignorance or mistake as to a matter of fact or law is a defense if
a. the ignorance or mistake negatives the purpose, knowledge, belief, recklessness or negligence required to establish a material element of the offense

mistake of fact or law is a defense if it negatives the purpose, knowledge, belief recklessness or negligence required to establish a material element of the offense mistake of age cannot be a defense if the child is below 10..strict liability at 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Justifications of Strict Liability

A
  • to protect the health and welfare of the public
  • To impose duties on those in position to impact the public widely
    -The accused is usually in the best position to prevent harm
    -
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Malum in se

A

wrong in itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Legality Principle

A

No Punishment with Law- individuals should be given fair notice as to the conduct that could subject them to preosecution and punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Default Mens Rea when Statute is silent

A

Recklessness (subjective).

Negligence (objective) is insufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mistake of Fact

A

defense if negatives culpability required to establish material element (D knows or substantial probability of knowing)

Regina v. Prince- mistake of fact not adefense

17
Q

Mistake of Law

A

D Rarely exculpated for mistake of law. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse

18
Q

General Intent

A

the intent to perform the criminal act or actus reus. If the defendant acts intentionally but without the additional desire to bring about a certain result, or do anything other than the criminal act itself, the defendant has acted with general intent.

19
Q

Specific Intent

A

the defendant acts with a more sophisticated level of awareness. Crimes that require specific intent usually fall into one of three categories: either the defendant intends to cause a certain bad result, the defendant intends to do something more than commit the criminal act, or the defendant acts with knowledge that his or her conduct is illegal,