General Flashcards
5 Levels of Interpretation for the WAIS
I, INTERPRET THE FSIQ & GAI
II, INTERPRET INDEXES
III, INTERPRET SUBTEST VARIABILITY
IV, QUALITATIVE/PROCESS ANALYSIS
V, ANALYZE INTRASUBTEST VARIABILITY
Content Validity
Degree to which individual items are representative of some domain of content (each question about depression)
Referral Question (Clinical Interview)
Who referred?
Why were they referred?
What do they hope to get out of the assessment?
WAIS Perceptional Reasoning Subtests
Block Design
Matrix Reasoning
Visual Puzzles
(Figure Weights)
(Picture Completion)
Cons of WAIS
- Lack of data supporting ecological validity
- Scoring may increase the probability of clerical errors
- Subjectivity of scoring WAIS
Blunted (affect)
not fully expressing self
Referral Education Setting
Teacher / School Administrator
- Noticed behaviors/emotional concerns and recommended assessment
- Evaluation for learning difficulties (LD)
- Emotional functioning may interfere with academics (e.g. ADHD)
- Strengths & weaknesses
- Creating Individualized Education Plan (IEP)
Fluid Intelligence
culture-free intelligence with which we are born; often reflected in memory span and spatial thinking tests. Ability to solve problems and adapt to new situations
Referral Settings
Psychiatric Hospital
Legal
Medical
Private Practice
Education
Supplemental Test Use
Used if core tests are spoiled or practitioner is unable to administer core test.
Digit Span (T)
WMI Core Test
Immediate Rote Recall (DF) and Manipulation (DB and LN)
Short term memory
Sensitive to distractibility
Reverse
IF THEY GET THE 1ST ONE WRONG, YOU MUST REVERSE TO ENSURE THE CLIENT HAS THE ABILITY TO ANSWER THE EASIER ONES
Cons of Intelligence Testing
Labels individuals
Cultural bias: limited usefulness in assessing minority groups w/ divergent cultural
backgrounds (culturally loaded items & difficulties establishing rapport)
IQ tests can be used to classify children into stereotyped categories, which limit their
freedom to choose fields of study
Limited in predicting nontest or nonacademic activity
IQ tests measure a persons’ current level of functioning, so are good for short term
predictions, but less accurate for long term predictions
Inherent bias toward emphasizing convergent, analytic, & scientific modes of thought.
Thus a person who emphasizes divergent, artistic, and imaginative modes of thought may
be at a distinct advantage.vAka it places creative ppl at a disadvantage
Ppl are capable of more cognitive abilities than can possible be measured on an IQ test
It’s not representative of all problem solving situations
IQ tests are not concerned w/ the underlying process involved in problem solving. Focus
is on the final outcome rather than steps involved in reaching the outcome
One criticism of the WAIS is their lack of data supporting their ecological (or everyday)
validity to understand how it applies to a clt’s everyday level of functioning
WAIS scoring may increase the probability of clerical errors
Subjectivity of scoring WAIS (Comp, similarities, & vocab)
Occupational History (Clinical Interview)
What jobs and for how long?
Any problems with the jobs?
Examples of Queries
Please tell me more
Can you elaborate
Please explain that
PSI
Processing Speed Index
Response speed, mental quickness
Speed of thinking as well as motor speed
Developmental History (Clinical Interview)
Pregnancy
- Complications
- Alcohol/drug exposure
- If yes, how much, how often, and what substance
- Prenatal traumas
- C-section vs. vaginal birth
- Medications taken during pregnancy
Developmental Milestones
-Walk, talk, fine motor skills, gross motor skills
Early medical history
Social History (Clinical Interview)
Friendships & Connections with others?
Major separations?
Victim of bullying?
Changes in personality
Ability to handle household chores/daily life activities
Community/culture/church impact
Things to consider when working with a client from a minority group
Primary language/English Competence
Reading and Writing level
Were they raised in the US (cultural influence)
Test normed on their culture?
Block Design (T)
PRI Core Test
Visual-Spatial organization
Speed of mental processing
Synthesis (part-whole relationships)
Visual motor coordination
How many times can you sub for each index and for the test total?
1 for each index. 2 total
Level 5
LEVEL V: Analyze Intrasubtest Variabililty
Look at each individual test responses (intra-subtest).
• Each subtest is designed that most people will move gradually through items, eventually reaching items they don’t know. When responses indicate that easier items were missed while the client scored well on more difficult items, it is notable. If there are inconsistencies in the responses, it is notable.
• Are there any specific styles of problem solving?
• (e.g. What does he/she do when faced with more difficult problems? Does he/she regress from forming complex responses to concrete responses when under time pressure?)
Interpret & Develop Hypothesis
Do a content analysis of the subtest items. Any interpretable personality dynamics from the responses (use as projective)?
• This happens a lot with comprehension: information, vocab, similarities
IQ Categories
130 and above -- Very Superior 120 to 129 -- Superior 110 to 119 -- Above Average 90 to 109 -- Average 80 to 89 -- Low Average 70 to 79 -- Borderline 69 and below -- Extremely Low
Raw Scores
sum of the correct answers; Correct answers minus incorrect answers
Tells us nothing about relative value
Coding (T)
PSI Core Test
Visual Motor Coordination
Psychomotor Speed
Short-term memory
WAIS Working Memory Subtests
Digit Span
Arithmetic
Letter
(Numbering)
Psychiatric History
Diagnoses
Medications
-Who prescribes them? Get names of Dr.
Previous Treatment
-With whom? For how long? Modality?
Family psychiatric history
Use of Substances
Suicide/Homicide attempts?
Previous Assessments?
Processing Speed Subtests
Symbol Search
Coding
(Cancellation)
How do you set the frame?
Kleenex
Lighting
Comfortable Room
Be on Time
Seating Distance
Cancellation (T)
PSI Supplemental Test
Scanning Abilities
PSI Tests
Symbol Search
Coding
(Cancellation)
Mood (Mental Status)
Mood
- Depressed
- dysphoric
- dysthymic
- euthymic (bubbly and optimistic)
- euphoric (overly bubbly and optimistic/somewhat manic)
- expansive (starting to get into psychotic optimism)
- Anxious
- Guilty
- Angry
Affect (facial expression)
- Appropriate
- labile
- blunted
- constricted
- flat
Judgment & Insight
Impulse control
Suicidal & homicidal ideation
Predictive Validity
How accurately the data can be used to
estimate scores obtained in the future (SATS on grades?)
part of criterion validity
Which two indexes are the most sensitive to outside influences?
WMI and PSI
Blocking (thought process)
Can’t or not wanting to talk about certain things
Letter-Number (T)
WMI Supplemental Test
Immediate Rote Recall (DF) and Manipulation (DB and LN)
Short term memory
Sensitive to distractibility
Medical History (Clinical Interview)
Family Medial History
Last Medical Exam
Medications
Major illnesses
Physical Traumas/ Major Injuries
Vision & Hearing problems
-Ear infections? How many & frequency?
Current physical symptoms/concerns
Comprehension (T)
Supplemental (VCI)
Social judgment and reasoning
Crystallized intelligence
Knowledge of conventional standards of behavior
Referral Psychiatric Inpatient
Psychiatrist
- Quick assessment of functioning
- Appropriateness for therapy
- Cognitive functioning
- Psychosocial functioning/history
Residential Treatment
- Tri-annual psychological assessment
- Cognitive & Emotional Functioning
- Placement concerns
Referral Psychological Clinic
Self referred or referred through therapist
- Instruments for development of treatment plan & recommendations
- Fact finding – What is wrong with my child?
- Therapist may sense more is happening organically than is evident through therapy and refer for further evaluation
Circumstantial (thought process)
Not following a logical pattern
Phases of Assessment
Referral question
Clinical interview
Choosing psychological tests
Gathering data
Scoring data
Interpreting data
Developing hypotheses
Writing report
Making recommendations
Giving feedback