General Flashcards

1
Q

No matter how trivial the offence, the law is averse to rely on his single word

A

Hume

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The elements needed to establish if the accused is to be found guilty of the crime in question

A

Lord Justice-General Rodger

Smith v Lees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evidence which supports or confirms the direct evidence of a witness

A

Fox v HMA

Lord Justice General Rodger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

More consistent

A

Mackie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The rule has proved an invaluable safeguard in the practice of our criminal courts against unjust conviction

A

Lord Aitchson, Morton v HMA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

‘Unmeritorious acquittals’

A

Peter Duff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If the doctrine is so valuable, why dilute it to such an extent?

A

Duff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Gillespie

A

Differing interpretation, good outcome, should be clear rule rather than convoluted fudge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Invaluable safeguard

A

Lord Justice-Clerk Aitchison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Undermine significant legal thinking

A

Charmers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

No one is stepping back and taking a broad view

A

Ferguson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Only intentional penetration and lack of consent require to be corroborated

A

Maqsood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Distress prove lack of consent

A

Smith v Lees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Arguments for abolition

A
  1. Unfit
  2. Injustice
  3. Archaic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Taylor v HMA

A

Moorov can apply with one complainer, as long as one act witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

One type of illegal act can be connected with others

A

MR V HMA

17
Q

SLC Criminal Evidence Bill

A

S4: previous offence- indicate course of conduct

S5: evidence of prev. Still relevant whether charges or not